MultiverSX聯合創始人突出顯示Solana的內部令牌分佈

Anatoly Yakovenko將權力下放測試解釋為客觀而不是主觀概念。他說，真正的分散網絡必須避免少數群體阻止多數決定。

On May 24, 2025, MultiversX co-founder Lucian Mincu publicly responded on X. He was following up to a comment by Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko about decentralization tests. Yakovenko had stated that decentralization should be an objective and measurable property.

2025年5月24日，MultiverSX聯合創始人Lucian Mincu公開回應了X。他正在遵循Solana聯合創始人Anatoly Yakovenko關於權力下放測試的評論。 Yakovenko表示，權力下放應該是客觀和可衡量的特性。

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko defined decentralization tests as objective rather than subjective concepts. He said a true decentralized network must avoid minority blocking majority decisions. Also, participants should exit or fork freely without network barriers. This approach aimed to measure decentralization as a technical and quantifiable property. Yakovenko intended these guidelines to unify definitions within the blockchain field. He believed clear standards could improve network trust and design decisions. The post itself was widely viewed by developers and community researchers online. His criteria aimed to bring clarity and reduce debate over network models.

Solana聯合創始人Anatoly Yakovenko將權力下放測試定義為客觀而不是主觀概念。他說，真正的分散網絡必須避免少數群體阻止多數決定。此外，參與者應在沒有網絡障礙的情況下自由退出或分叉。這種方法旨在將權力下放為技術和可量化的特性。 Yakovenko打算將這些準則統一區塊鏈字段中的定義。他認為明確的標準可以改善網絡信任和設計決策。在線開發人員和社區研究人員廣泛看到了該帖子本身。他的標準旨在帶來清晰度並減少有關網絡模型的辯論。

Anatoly Yakovenko set out objective criteria for evaluating network structure.

Anatoly Yakovenko制定了評估網絡結構的客觀標準。

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko defined decentralization tests as objective rather than subjective concepts. He said a true decentralized network must avoid minority blocking majority decisions.

Solana聯合創始人Anatoly Yakovenko將權力下放測試定義為客觀而不是主觀概念。他說，真正的分散網絡必須避免少數群體阻止多數決定。

"Participants can exit or fork freely without any network barriers," Yakovenko explained. He highlighted that these properties enable measuring decentralization as a technical and quantifiable property.

Yakovenko解釋說：“參與者可以在沒有任何網絡障礙的情況下自由退出或分叉。”他強調說，這些特性可以將分散化作為技術和可量化的特性。

"We can objectively identify and classify decentralized networks according to these criteria," he stated. Yakovenko intended these guidelines to unify definitions within the blockchain field. He believed that clear standards could improve network trust and design decisions.

他說：“我們可以根據這些標準客觀地識別和分類網絡分類。” Yakovenko打算將這些準則統一區塊鏈字段中的定義。他認為明確的標準可以改善網絡信任和設計決策。

"This will help in making better network design decisions and drive towards building truly decentralized protocols," Yakovenko added. The post itself was viewed widely by developers and community researchers online. His criteria aimed to bring clarity and reduce discussion over network models.

Yakovenko補充說：“這將有助於做出更好的網絡設計決策，並推動建立真正分散的協議。”在線開發人員和社區研究人員廣泛觀看了該帖子本身。他的標準旨在提高網絡模型的清晰度並減少討論。

However, Mincu challenged those ideas by pointing to what he saw as Solana’s decentralization shortcomings. He argued that over 48% of tokens were allocated to insiders and venture investors.

但是，Mincu指出了他認為Solana的權力下放缺點，從而挑戰了這些想法。他認為，超過48％的令牌分配給了內部人士和風險投資者。

“This wasn’t disclosed until after mainnet launch and is an imbalance of power that undermines decentralization ideals. Especially when considering that hardware requirements to run a Solana validator node were demanding, even in 2021, shortly after launch, Solana Labs was recommending twelve-core processors and one hundred twenty-eight gigabytes of RAM for optimal performance for a validator node. These strict requirements placed a significant financial barrier to entry for individuals or organizations wishing to participate in securing the network at the validator level.

“This wasn't disclosed until after mainnet launch and is an imbalance of power that undermines decentralization ideals. Especially when considering that hardware requirements to run a Solana validator node were demanding, even in 2021, shortly after launch, Solana Labs was recommending twelve-core processors and one hundred twenty-eight gigabytes of RAM for optimal performance for a validator node. These strict requirements placed a significant financial barrier to entry for individuals or organizations希望參與確保網絡在驗證器級別上。

“The thinking went that if you want to be a good citizen and participate in securing the network, you should buy some SOL and set up a validator node. But the operational costs were also quite high. At that time, validators needed to pay around one SOL each day during the 2021 operations to cover network fees and keep the validator running smoothly. One SOL was about two hundred dollars in USD at that time. These high costs, combined with technical demands, limited validator participation to a smaller set of entities who could handle both the financial burden and technical maintenance. This dynamic, unfortunately, conflicted with the spirit of open participation and decentralization that many networks strive for.

“這種想法是，如果您想成為一個好公民並參與確保網絡的確保，您應該購買一些溶膠並設置一個驗證器節點。但是運營成本也很高。當時，驗證者每天需要在2021年的運營中每天支付一索左右的支付左右，以付出較小的驗證器，以使驗證較小的效果較小。在這些量較小的效果下，這些溶品的較小成本是有限的。不幸的是，可以處理這種動態的實體，這與許多網絡努力爭取的公開參與和權力下放的精神相抵觸。

“The community saw that these economic barriers hindered fair participation in Solana’s network. This condition contrasted sharply with decentralization goals set by many networks. Community members observed that few small stakeholders could feasibly meet such operational costs. This observation sparked broader discussion on network equity and control.

“社區看到這些經濟障礙阻礙了索拉納網絡的公平參與。這種條件與許多網絡設定的權力下放目標形成鮮明對比。社區成員觀察到，很少有小利益相關者能夠可行地滿足此類運營成本。這種觀察結果引發了對網絡股票和控制的更廣泛的討論。

Mincu's point about significant token allocation imbalance was reinforced by historical research. A 2021 Messari Research Hub report highlighted insider holdings of over forty eight percent. In contrast, other protocols like Ethereum and Cardano showed insider stakes around fifteen to seventeen percent. This disparity raised questions about fairness in governance and decision making. Critics argued that concentrated holdings could unduly influence upgrade votes and emission control decisions. The report compared decentralization metrics across major layer-one blockchains. This comparison highlighted the challenge of balancing performance and decentralization. This data prompted fresh community discussions on network equity and control.

Mincu關於嚴重的令牌分配失衡的觀點得到了歷史研究的加強。一份2021年的彌賽亞研究中心報告強調了48％以上的內部人士持有。相比之下，其他方案（例如以太坊和卡爾達諾）顯示內幕賭注約15至17％。這種差異引發了有關治理和決策中公平性的問題。批評家認為，集中持有的持股可能會不適當地影響升級投票和排放控制決策。該報告比較了主要一層區塊鏈之間的權力下放指標。這種比較強調了平衡績效和權力下放的挑戰。這些數據促使有關網絡公平和控制的新社區討論。

Mincu also highlighted widespread concerns about governance in Solana's ecosystem. He said that bridges and liquidity pools were largely dominated by a handful of large players. This concentration of power and influence limited the ability of smaller stakeholders to engage meaningfully in network decision making.

Mincu還強調了對Solana生態系統中治理的廣泛關注。他說，橋樑和流動性池在很大程度上由少數大型玩家主導。這種力量和影響力限制了較小的利益相關者有意義地參與網絡決策的能力。

“This unbalanced participation could lead to emergency upgrades or critical decisions being made in a way that didn't reflect the broader community sentiment. As a result, community members expressed worries that this model created risks for network adaptability and trust in the long term. Mincu suggested that these factors contrasted with the ideal of inclusive governance in decentralized systems. He said that ultimately this discussion highlighted the trade-offs between speed, scale, and decentralization integrity in blockchain networks. Observers viewed this issue as a key test for blockchain governance in the evolving landscape of Web3. The conversation sparked discussion on best practices for protocol rules and community engagement in decision making.

“這種不平衡的參與可能會導致緊急升級或以不反映更廣泛的社區情緒的方式做出的重大決定。結果，社區成員表示擔心這種模式在長期長期內給網絡適應性和信任帶來了風險。MINCU表明，這些因素與他說的那樣，這是在體面範圍內的理想之處，他說的是，他說的是，他說的是，他說的是，他說的是，他說的是，這一範圍是在體面的範圍內。網絡觀察者將此問題視為Web 3中不斷發展的區塊鏈治理的關鍵測試。

This exchange highlighted the ongoing challenge of

這種交流強調了持續的挑戰