MultiverSX联合创始人突出显示Solana的内部令牌分布

Anatoly Yakovenko将权力下放测试解释为客观而不是主观概念。他说，真正的分散网络必须避免少数群体阻止多数决定。

On May 24, 2025, MultiversX co-founder Lucian Mincu publicly responded on X. He was following up to a comment by Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko about decentralization tests. Yakovenko had stated that decentralization should be an objective and measurable property.

2025年5月24日，MultiverSX联合创始人Lucian Mincu公开回应了X。他正在遵循Solana联合创始人Anatoly Yakovenko关于权力下放测试的评论。 Yakovenko表示，权力下放应该是客观和可衡量的特性。

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko defined decentralization tests as objective rather than subjective concepts. He said a true decentralized network must avoid minority blocking majority decisions. Also, participants should exit or fork freely without network barriers. This approach aimed to measure decentralization as a technical and quantifiable property. Yakovenko intended these guidelines to unify definitions within the blockchain field. He believed clear standards could improve network trust and design decisions. The post itself was widely viewed by developers and community researchers online. His criteria aimed to bring clarity and reduce debate over network models.

Solana联合创始人Anatoly Yakovenko将权力下放测试定义为客观而不是主观概念。他说，真正的分散网络必须避免少数群体阻止多数决定。此外，参与者应在没有网络障碍的情况下自由退出或分叉。这种方法旨在将权力下放为技术和可量化的特性。 Yakovenko打算将这些准则统一区块链字段中的定义。他认为明确的标准可以改善网络信任和设计决策。在线开发人员和社区研究人员广泛看到了该帖子本身。他的标准旨在带来清晰度并减少有关网络模型的辩论。

Anatoly Yakovenko set out objective criteria for evaluating network structure.

Anatoly Yakovenko制定了评估网络结构的客观标准。

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko defined decentralization tests as objective rather than subjective concepts. He said a true decentralized network must avoid minority blocking majority decisions.

Solana联合创始人Anatoly Yakovenko将权力下放测试定义为客观而不是主观概念。他说，真正的分散网络必须避免少数群体阻止多数决定。

"Participants can exit or fork freely without any network barriers," Yakovenko explained. He highlighted that these properties enable measuring decentralization as a technical and quantifiable property.

Yakovenko解释说：“参与者可以在没有任何网络障碍的情况下自由退出或分叉。”他强调说，这些特性可以将分散化作为技术和可量化的特性。

"We can objectively identify and classify decentralized networks according to these criteria," he stated. Yakovenko intended these guidelines to unify definitions within the blockchain field. He believed that clear standards could improve network trust and design decisions.

他说：“我们可以根据这些标准客观地识别和分类网络分类。” Yakovenko打算将这些准则统一区块链字段中的定义。他认为明确的标准可以改善网络信任和设计决策。

"This will help in making better network design decisions and drive towards building truly decentralized protocols," Yakovenko added. The post itself was viewed widely by developers and community researchers online. His criteria aimed to bring clarity and reduce discussion over network models.

Yakovenko补充说：“这将有助于做出更好的网络设计决策，并推动建立真正分散的协议。”在线开发人员和社区研究人员广泛观看了该帖子本身。他的标准旨在提高网络模型的清晰度并减少讨论。

However, Mincu challenged those ideas by pointing to what he saw as Solana’s decentralization shortcomings. He argued that over 48% of tokens were allocated to insiders and venture investors.

但是，Mincu指出了他认为Solana的权力下放缺点，从而挑战了这些想法。他认为，超过48％的令牌分配给了内部人士和风险投资者。

“This wasn’t disclosed until after mainnet launch and is an imbalance of power that undermines decentralization ideals. Especially when considering that hardware requirements to run a Solana validator node were demanding, even in 2021, shortly after launch, Solana Labs was recommending twelve-core processors and one hundred twenty-eight gigabytes of RAM for optimal performance for a validator node. These strict requirements placed a significant financial barrier to entry for individuals or organizations wishing to participate in securing the network at the validator level.

“This wasn't disclosed until after mainnet launch and is an imbalance of power that undermines decentralization ideals. Especially when considering that hardware requirements to run a Solana validator node were demanding, even in 2021, shortly after launch, Solana Labs was recommending twelve-core processors and one hundred twenty-eight gigabytes of RAM for optimal performance for a validator node. These strict requirements placed a significant financial barrier to entry for individuals or organizations希望参与确保网络在验证器级别上。

“The thinking went that if you want to be a good citizen and participate in securing the network, you should buy some SOL and set up a validator node. But the operational costs were also quite high. At that time, validators needed to pay around one SOL each day during the 2021 operations to cover network fees and keep the validator running smoothly. One SOL was about two hundred dollars in USD at that time. These high costs, combined with technical demands, limited validator participation to a smaller set of entities who could handle both the financial burden and technical maintenance. This dynamic, unfortunately, conflicted with the spirit of open participation and decentralization that many networks strive for.

“这种想法是，如果您想成为一个好公民并参与确保网络的确保，您应该购买一些溶胶并设置一个验证器节点。但是运营成本也很高。当时，验证者每天需要在2021年的运营中每天支付一索左右的支付左右，以付出较小的验证器，以使验证较小的效果较小。在这些量较小的效果下，这些溶品的较小成本是有限的。不幸的是，可以处理这种动态的实体，这与许多网络努力争取的公开参与和权力下放的精神相抵触。

“The community saw that these economic barriers hindered fair participation in Solana’s network. This condition contrasted sharply with decentralization goals set by many networks. Community members observed that few small stakeholders could feasibly meet such operational costs. This observation sparked broader discussion on network equity and control.

“社区看到这些经济障碍阻碍了索拉纳网络的公平参与。这种条件与许多网络设定的权力下放目标形成鲜明对比。社区成员观察到，很少有小利益相关者能够可行地满足此类运营成本。这种观察结果引发了对网络股票和控制的更广泛的讨论。

Mincu's point about significant token allocation imbalance was reinforced by historical research. A 2021 Messari Research Hub report highlighted insider holdings of over forty eight percent. In contrast, other protocols like Ethereum and Cardano showed insider stakes around fifteen to seventeen percent. This disparity raised questions about fairness in governance and decision making. Critics argued that concentrated holdings could unduly influence upgrade votes and emission control decisions. The report compared decentralization metrics across major layer-one blockchains. This comparison highlighted the challenge of balancing performance and decentralization. This data prompted fresh community discussions on network equity and control.

Mincu关于严重的令牌分配失衡的观点得到了历史研究的加强。一份2021年的弥赛亚研究中心报告强调了48％以上的内部人士持有。相比之下，其他方案（例如以太坊和卡尔达诺）显示内幕赌注约15至17％。这种差异引发了有关治理和决策中公平性的问题。批评家认为，集中持有的持股可能会不适当地影响升级投票和排放控制决策。该报告比较了主要一层区块链之间的权力下放指标。这种比较强调了平衡绩效和权力下放的挑战。这些数据促使有关网络公平和控制的新社区讨论。

Mincu also highlighted widespread concerns about governance in Solana's ecosystem. He said that bridges and liquidity pools were largely dominated by a handful of large players. This concentration of power and influence limited the ability of smaller stakeholders to engage meaningfully in network decision making.

Mincu还强调了对Solana生态系统中治理的广泛关注。他说，桥梁和流动性池在很大程度上由少数大型玩家主导。这种力量和影响力限制了较小的利益相关者有意义地参与网络决策的能力。

“This unbalanced participation could lead to emergency upgrades or critical decisions being made in a way that didn't reflect the broader community sentiment. As a result, community members expressed worries that this model created risks for network adaptability and trust in the long term. Mincu suggested that these factors contrasted with the ideal of inclusive governance in decentralized systems. He said that ultimately this discussion highlighted the trade-offs between speed, scale, and decentralization integrity in blockchain networks. Observers viewed this issue as a key test for blockchain governance in the evolving landscape of Web3. The conversation sparked discussion on best practices for protocol rules and community engagement in decision making.

“这种不平衡的参与可能会导致紧急升级或以不反映更广泛的社区情绪的方式做出的重大决定。结果，社区成员表示担心这种模式在长期长期内给网络适应性和信任带来了风险。MINCU表明，这些因素与他说的那样，这是在体面范围内的理想之处，他说的是，他说的是，他说的是，他说的是，他说的是，他说的是，这一范围是在体面的范围内。网络观察者将此问题视为Web 3中不断发展的区块链治理的关键测试。

This exchange highlighted the ongoing challenge of

这种交流强调了持续的挑战