市值: $3.7582T 1.060%
體積(24小時): $129.4006B -11.610%
  • 市值: $3.7582T 1.060%
  • 體積(24小時): $129.4006B -11.610%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.7582T 1.060%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$114590.098679 USD

0.84%

ethereum
ethereum

$3659.900659 USD

1.89%

xrp
xrp

$2.976430 USD

1.50%

tether
tether

$1.000126 USD

0.01%

bnb
bnb

$767.914721 USD

2.35%

solana
solana

$167.122014 USD

2.70%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999861 USD

-0.02%

tron
tron

$0.338497 USD

1.95%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.203857 USD

3.06%

cardano
cardano

$0.736433 USD

2.61%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$37.923035 USD

1.63%

stellar
stellar

$0.397260 USD

1.99%

sui
sui

$3.461666 USD

2.31%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$570.196500 USD

2.71%

chainlink
chainlink

$16.623731 USD

2.72%

加密貨幣新聞文章

以太坊,L2提款和權力下放:紐約人

2025/08/07 07:06

以太坊的重點轉移到更快的L2提款中,以獲得更好的用戶體驗和分散性,在不斷發展的生態系統中平衡速度和安全性。

以太坊,L2提款和權力下放:紐約人

Ethereum, L2 Withdrawals, and Decentralization: A New Yorker's Take

以太坊,L2提款和權力下放:紐約人

Yo, the Ethereum scene is always hustling, and right now, all the buzz is about speeding up those Layer-2 (L2) withdrawals. Vitalik himself is pushing for sub-one-hour withdrawals, which is kinda a big deal. It's all about making the whole experience smoother and keeping things decentralized, ya know?

喲,以太坊的場景總是在忙碌,現在,所有的嗡嗡聲都是關於加快2層(L2)的提款。 Vitalik本人正在努力進行一小時的戒斷,這很重要。這一切都是為了使整個體驗更加順暢,並使事情分散了,您知道嗎?

The Need for Speed: Why Faster Withdrawals Matter

速度的需求:為什麼更快的戒斷很重要

Right now, pulling your assets from an L2 back to the main Ethereum network can take up to a week. A week! In this city, that's like, an eternity. Vitalik points out that this delay is a major pain and pushes people towards using less secure bridging solutions. Think about it: who wants to wait that long? Nobody. So, folks are tempted to use these sketchy multi-sig wallets and MPC systems, which ain't exactly in line with Ethereum's core values of decentralization.

目前,將您的資產從L2恢復到主要以太坊網絡可能需要一周的時間。一個星期!在這個城市,就像是永恆的。 Vitalik指出,這種延遲是一種嚴重的痛苦,並促使人們使用較不安全的橋接解決方案。考慮一下:誰想等待那麼長時間?沒有人。因此,人們很想使用這些粗略的多智錢包和MPC系統,這與以太坊的權力下放核心價值完全不符。

ZK-Proofs to the Rescue?

ZK-PROFFORAMS救援?

So, how do we fix this mess? Well, ZK-proofs are stepping up. Back in the day, optimistic rollups were the go-to because ZK tech was still kinda raw and expensive. But now, ZK-proofs are getting their act together, offering faster and more secure execution. Vitalik even mentioned this site, ethproofs.org, that's tracking all the progress. Keep an eye on it.

那麼,我們如何解決這個混亂?好吧,ZK-Provers正在加強。早在一天,樂觀的匯總才是首選,因為ZK Tech仍然有點原始且昂貴。但是現在,ZK-Provers正在將他們的行為融合在一起,提供更快,更安全的執行。 Vitalik甚至提到了這個網站Exproofs.org,它正在跟踪所有進展。密切關注它。

But there's a catch. The gas costs for submitting those huge ZK proofs on-chain are still high. Once those costs come down, Ethereum could become a super-fast settlement hub, making it easier to move assets across L2s without relying on those centralized bridges. Imagine that.

但是有一個漁獲。提交那些巨大的ZK證明鏈上的氣體成本仍然很高。一旦這些成本降低,以太坊可能會成為一個超級快速的定居點樞紐,從而在不依賴那些集中式橋樑的情況下更輕鬆地將資產移動。想像一下。

Decentralization in Gaming: Not Just a Buzzword

遊戲中的權力下放:不僅僅是流行語

Speaking of decentralization, let's switch gears to blockchain gaming for a sec. A lot of these games throw around the word 'decentralized' like confetti, but how decentralized are they really? Turns out, not always as much as they claim.

說到權力下放,讓我們將齒輪轉換為區塊鏈遊戲秒。這些遊戲中的許多遊戲都像五彩紙屑一樣圍繞著“分散的”一詞,但是它們的分散程度如何?事實證明,並不總是像他們聲稱的那樣多。

It boils down to what parts of the game live on-chain versus off-chain. On-chain stuff, like token transactions and asset ownership, is solid. But game logic? Combat systems? That usually happens off-chain on centralized servers. Why? Because running complex gameplay on the blockchain is slow and expensive. So, many "decentralized" games are only partially so. Gotta keep it real.

它歸結為遊戲的哪些部分在鏈上與鍊鍊生活在一起。鏈上的東西,例如代幣交易和資產所有權,都是堅實的。但是遊戲邏輯?戰鬥系統?這通常發生在集中式服務器上。為什麼?因為在區塊鏈上運行複雜的遊戲玩法是緩慢而昂貴的。因此,許多“分散”遊戲只是部分原因。要保持真實。

Hybrid Models: The Pragmatic Approach

混合模型:務實的方法

Full decentralization sounds great, but it's not always practical. A lot of the top blockchain games use hybrid models, keeping assets and wallets decentralized while handling gameplay off-chain for performance. And that’s fine, as long as they're transparent about it. What matters is knowing what you truly own and control.

完整的權力下放聽起來很棒,但這並不總是實用的。許多頂級區塊鏈遊戲都使用混合型號,在處理遊戲外的鏈接以進行性能的同時,將資產和錢包分散。那很好,只要它們對此透明。重要的是知道您真正擁有的和控制。

Treasury Companies: A Better Bet Than ETFs?

財政公司:比ETF更好的賭注?

And get this: some analysts are saying that Ethereum treasury companies might be a better investment than those Ethereum spot ETFs. These companies are actively involved in DeFi, staking their ETH to generate extra returns. Some of them are even aiming for returns of up to 14% annually by exploring DeFi yield strategies, including NFTs and Web3 gaming.

並得到這個:一些分析師說,以太坊財政部公司可能比那些以太坊現場ETF更好。這些公司積極參與Defi,將其ETH籌集出來以產生額外的回報。他們中的一些人甚至通過探索包括NFTS和Web3遊戲在內的Defi收益策略來實現每年14%的回報。

These treasury companies, according to Standard Chartered analysts, offer superior investment opportunities due to their participation in both price appreciation and additional onchain income streams. Imagine making money just by letting your ETH sit there and work for you. That's the dream, right?

根據標準特許分析師的說法,這些財政公司由於參與價格升值和額外的OnChain收入流而提供了較高的投資機會。想像一下,只要讓您的ETH坐在那里為您工作而賺錢。那是夢,對嗎?

Final Thoughts: Keep It Moving

最終想法:繼續前進

So, what's the takeaway? Ethereum is evolving, pushing for faster L2 withdrawals to improve user experience and reinforce its role as the central hub of the ecosystem. Decentralization is more than just a buzzword; it's a direction. And whether it's through ZK-proofs, hybrid gaming models, or innovative treasury strategies, the name of the game is progress. Keep your eyes peeled, stay informed, and remember: in the city that never sleeps, the blockchain is always hustling.

那麼,收穫是什麼?以太坊正在不斷發展,推動更快的L2提取以改善用戶體驗並增強其作為生態系統中心樞紐的作用。權力下放不僅僅是一個流行語。這是一個方向。無論是通過ZK-PROFFROFS,混合遊戲模型還是創新的國庫策略,遊戲的名稱都是進步。保持眼睛剝落,保持知情並記住:在不睡覺的城市中,區塊鏈總是在忙碌。

原始來源:ainvest

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年08月07日 其他文章發表於