運動實驗室是世界自由財務支持的加密項目，面臨著強烈的反彈和內部異議

運動實驗室是世界自由支持的加密項目，正面臨著沉重的反彈和內部反對的人，因為這很大的代幣承諾

Movement Labs, the World Liberty Financial-backed crypto project, is facing backlash and internal dissent as quiet promises of large token stakes made to early insiders have come to light.

全球自由財務支持的加密項目運動實驗室正面臨反彈和內部反對，因為對早期內部人士的大量象徵股份的安靜承諾已經曝光。

The previously undisclosed deals have raised fresh questions about who is running things behind closed doors.

以前未公開的交易已經提出了有關誰在閉門造車後面運行的問題。

Movement Labs gets caught up in under-the-table arrangements

運動實驗室陷入桌子底下的安排

運動實驗室陷入桌子底下的安排

Before its token launch, Movement Labs reportedly committed large portions of MOVE’s supply to a spattering of early advisers, an action it kept hidden from investors that only surfaced via internal documents.

據報導，在其代幣發布之前，運動實驗室將Move的大部分供應投入到了早期顧問的飛濺中，這一行動對投資者隱藏了只有通過內部文件浮出水面的投資者。

According to two business memos obtained by CoinDesk, Movement, which was founded in 2023 by two 20-year-old Vanderbilt dropouts, used these advisers as a crutch to gain a foothold in the crypto industry.

根據Coindesk獲得的兩份業務備忘錄，該Movems由兩名20歲的Vanderbilt輟學者於2023年創立，使用這些顧問作為拐杖，在加密貨幣行業中獲得了立足點。

However, Movement Labs has said the agreements, dated shortly after the project’s founding, were exploratory in nature and non-binding.

但是，運動實驗室說，在該項目成立後不久，這些協議本質上是探索性的。

Still, the existence of the agreements highlights the chaotic inner workings of Movement Labs, which is still licking its wounds after it came under fire last month for market-making deals that facilitated token dumping by insiders.

儘管如此，協議的存在仍凸顯了運動實驗室的混亂內部運作，上個月在其遭到抨擊之後，它仍在舔傷口，以促進內部人士的銷售，以促進代幣的傾銷。

That insider trading pissed many off, but the fallout from the revealed commitment to advisers is taking that anger to the next level. There are also many within the company playing the blame game, focusing on how Movement was steered into a predatory agreement with a Chinese market maker under terms that reportedly encouraged predatory selling.

內幕交易使許多人生氣了，但是對顧問的承諾的後果將這種憤怒提升到了新的水平。公司內部也有許多責任遊戲，重點是如何將運動轉向與中國做市商的掠奪性協議，據報導鼓勵掠奪性銷售。

There is now a public rift between Movement Labs’ co-founders Rushi Manche, who was dismissed this month, and Cooper Scanlon, who is no longer the CEO but remains at the company.

現在，本月被解僱的運動實驗室的聯合創始人拉什·曼奇（Rushi Manche）和不再是首席執行官但仍留在公司的庫珀·斯坎倫（Cooper Scanlon）之間有了公共裂痕。

Manche claims he was merely the CTO leading the engineering team when they started Movement and as such, left most of the business decisions, including the contracts, to Cooper.

Manche聲稱，他只是開始運動時領導工程團隊的首席技術官，因此，包括合同在內的大多數商業決策都留給了庫珀。

“When priorities changed, our roles changed, but Cooper’s decisions in the early days heavily shaped the way the launch went,” Manche told CoinDesk in an interview.

“當優先事項發生變化時，我們的角色改變了，但是庫珀在早期的決定就大大塑造了發射的發展方式，” Manche在接受采訪時告訴Coindesk。

Movement Labs’ shadow advisers

運動實驗室的影子顧問

運動實驗室的影子顧問

According to more than a dozen people familiar with Movement, including current and former employees who were granted anonymity so they could speak more candidly, the agreements concern Sam Thapaliya and Vinit Parekh, both of whom played significant roles in shaping the project during its early stages.

根據熟悉運動的十多名人物，包括被匿名的現任和前僱員，因此他們可以更坦率地講話，這些協議涉及Sam Thapaliya和Vinit Parekh，他們在早期階段都在塑造該項目中起著重要作用。

Thapaliya, the CEO of Zebec Protocol, was reportedly loaned 5% of MOVE’s supply for marketing and market-making purposes, according to one of the agreements obtained by CoinDesk.

根據Coindesk獲得的一項協議，Zebec協議首席執行官Thapaliya被借給Move的營銷和營銷目的的5％。

Another agreement dated March 2023, allocated Thapaliya 2.5% of the token’s total supply, which is worth more than $50 million at recent prices.

日期為2023年3月的另一項協議，分配了Thapaliya的2.5％，佔代幣總供應量的2.5％，近期價格價值超過5000萬美元。

Movement Labs is adamant that the signed agreements with Thapaliya were not binding, but Thapaliya claimed the agreements “were never voided.”

運動實驗室堅持認為與Thapaliya的簽署協議沒有約束力，但Thapaliya聲稱該協議“從未做過作業”。

A memorandum of understanding is normally considered non-binding, but the agreements also include provisions that make it impossible for them to be voided except with the consent of “both parties.”

通常認為理解的備忘錄通常被認為是無約束力的，但是協議還包括規定，除非同意“雙方”，否則使他們不可能做出作業。

“I plan on pursuing legally to exercise my claim to retrieve 2.5% of tokens,” Thapaliya, who was tagged a “shadow founder” by employees of Movement Labs, has said.

“我計劃合法地追求我的主張，以檢索2.5％的代幣，”被運動實驗室員工標記為“影子創始人”的Thapaliya說。

His name also came up in internal communications regarding Movement’s deal with Web3Port, a Chinese market maker that was later blamed for dumping $38 million in tokens after MOVE’s debut.

他的名字也出現在內部溝通中，涉及運動與中國做市商Web3port的交易，後來被指責為在Move的首次亮相後將3800萬美元投入令牌。

Vinit Parekh is the second name that came up in the subject of shadow founders linked to Movement Labs. CoinDesk claims a 2023 agreement saw Movement Labs agree to give Vinit Parekh’s “Digital Incubation Group” $50,000 annually for every $1 million raised by Movement Labs.

Vinit Parekh是與運動實驗室相關的影子創始人主題中出現的第二個名字。 Coindesk聲稱，一項2023年的協議SEW Engive Labs同意為Vinit Parekh的“數字孵化集團”提供50,000美元，每100萬美元由運動實驗室籌集。

There was also another agreement that granted a separate Parekh entity control of 2.5% of the MOVE token supply.

還有另一項協議授予了一個單獨的Parekh實體控制權，即MOVE MOVE供應量的2.5％。

In exchange for his allocation, Parekh’s firm, Digital Incubation Group, was tasked with several things, including the development of strategy framework, tokenomics, and engaging in structuring team pre-product launch.

為了換取他的分配，Parekh的公司Digital Invubation Group的任務是幾件事，包括制定戰略框架，Tokenomics，並參與構建團隊預生產前的啟動。

Parekh’s agreements were also structured as memoranda of understanding with a termination clause requiring consent from both “parties.” However, Parekh and Movement Labs have tagged the agreements exploratory and claimed that funds never changed hands between either party.

Parekh的協議還以終止條款為本條款構成，以備忘錄，要求雙方同意。但是，帕雷克（Parekh）和運動實驗室已經標記了協議的探索性，並聲稱資金從未在任何一方之間易手。

Nevertheless, sources close to Movement Labs have said that Parekh, a Microsoft product manager turned blockchain industry consultant, was a constant presence at Movement’s San Francisco office.

儘管如此，接近運動實驗室的消息人士說，微軟產品經理變成區塊鏈行業顧問Parekh一直是運動舊金山辦公室的業務。

However, unlike Thapaliya, Parekh has claimed the arrangement was out of love for the ecosystem and that no money has changed hands between his party or Movement Labs.

但是，與Thapaliya不同，Parekh聲稱這種安排是對生態系統的熱愛，並且在他的政黨或運動實驗室之間沒有任何錢。

The fallout from the scandal has now drawn attention to the widening rift between its co-founders, Manche and Scanlon.

現在，醜聞的後果引起了人們對聯合創始人Manche和Scanlon之間不斷擴大的裂痕的關注。

After an excerpt from one of the Thapaliya agreements leaked on X, Manche highlighted his former partner’s role in approving the deal by pointing to Scanlon’s signature on the memo. He also shared

在X洩露的Thapaliya協議之一的摘錄之後，Manche強調了他的前伴侶在批准這筆交易中的角色，指出了Scanlon在備忘錄上的簽名。他也分享