运动实验室是世界自由财务支持的加密项目，面临着强烈的反弹和内部异议

运动实验室是世界自由支持的加密项目，正面临着沉重的反弹和内部反对的人，因为这很大的代币承诺

Movement Labs, the World Liberty Financial-backed crypto project, is facing backlash and internal dissent as quiet promises of large token stakes made to early insiders have come to light.

全球自由财务支持的加密项目运动实验室正面临反弹和内部反对，因为对早期内部人士的大量象征股份的安静承诺已经曝光。

The previously undisclosed deals have raised fresh questions about who is running things behind closed doors.

以前未公开的交易已经提出了有关谁在闭门造车后面运行的问题。

Movement Labs gets caught up in under-the-table arrangements

运动实验室陷入桌子底下的安排

运动实验室陷入桌子底下的安排

Before its token launch, Movement Labs reportedly committed large portions of MOVE’s supply to a spattering of early advisers, an action it kept hidden from investors that only surfaced via internal documents.

据报道，在其代币发布之前，运动实验室将Move的大部分供应投入到了早期顾问的飞溅中，这一行动对投资者隐藏了只有通过内部文件浮出水面的投资者。

According to two business memos obtained by CoinDesk, Movement, which was founded in 2023 by two 20-year-old Vanderbilt dropouts, used these advisers as a crutch to gain a foothold in the crypto industry.

根据Coindesk获得的两份业务备忘录，该Movems由两名20岁的Vanderbilt辍学者于2023年创立，使用这些顾问作为拐杖，在加密货币行业中获得了立足点。

However, Movement Labs has said the agreements, dated shortly after the project’s founding, were exploratory in nature and non-binding.

但是，运动实验室说，在该项目成立后不久，这些协议本质上是探索性的。

Still, the existence of the agreements highlights the chaotic inner workings of Movement Labs, which is still licking its wounds after it came under fire last month for market-making deals that facilitated token dumping by insiders.

尽管如此，协议的存在仍凸显了运动实验室的混乱内部运作，上个月在其遭到抨击之后，它仍在舔伤口，以促进内部人士的销售，以促进代币的倾销。

That insider trading pissed many off, but the fallout from the revealed commitment to advisers is taking that anger to the next level. There are also many within the company playing the blame game, focusing on how Movement was steered into a predatory agreement with a Chinese market maker under terms that reportedly encouraged predatory selling.

内幕交易使许多人生气了，但是对顾问的承诺的后果将这种愤怒提升到了新的水平。公司内部也有许多责任游戏，重点是如何将运动转向与中国做市商的掠夺性协议，据报道鼓励掠夺性销售。

There is now a public rift between Movement Labs’ co-founders Rushi Manche, who was dismissed this month, and Cooper Scanlon, who is no longer the CEO but remains at the company.

现在，本月被解雇的运动实验室的联合创始人拉什·曼奇（Rushi Manche）和不再是首席执行官但仍留在公司的库珀·斯坎伦（Cooper Scanlon）之间有了公共裂痕。

Manche claims he was merely the CTO leading the engineering team when they started Movement and as such, left most of the business decisions, including the contracts, to Cooper.

Manche声称，他只是开始运动时领导工程团队的首席技术官，因此，包括合同在内的大多数商业决策都留给了库珀。

“When priorities changed, our roles changed, but Cooper’s decisions in the early days heavily shaped the way the launch went,” Manche told CoinDesk in an interview.

“当优先事项发生变化时，我们的角色改变了，但是库珀在早期的决定就大大塑造了发射的发展方式，” Manche在接受采访时告诉Coindesk。

Movement Labs’ shadow advisers

运动实验室的影子顾问

运动实验室的影子顾问

According to more than a dozen people familiar with Movement, including current and former employees who were granted anonymity so they could speak more candidly, the agreements concern Sam Thapaliya and Vinit Parekh, both of whom played significant roles in shaping the project during its early stages.

根据熟悉运动的十多名人物，包括被匿名的现任和前雇员，因此他们可以更坦率地讲话，这些协议涉及Sam Thapaliya和Vinit Parekh，他们在早期阶段都在塑造该项目中起着重要作用。

Thapaliya, the CEO of Zebec Protocol, was reportedly loaned 5% of MOVE’s supply for marketing and market-making purposes, according to one of the agreements obtained by CoinDesk.

根据Coindesk获得的一项协议，Zebec协议首席执行官Thapaliya被借给Move的营销和营销目的的5％。

Another agreement dated March 2023, allocated Thapaliya 2.5% of the token’s total supply, which is worth more than $50 million at recent prices.

日期为2023年3月的另一项协议，分配了Thapaliya的2.5％，占代币总供应量的2.5％，近期价格价值超过5000万美元。

Movement Labs is adamant that the signed agreements with Thapaliya were not binding, but Thapaliya claimed the agreements “were never voided.”

运动实验室坚持认为与Thapaliya的签署协议没有约束力，但Thapaliya声称该协议“从未做过作业”。

A memorandum of understanding is normally considered non-binding, but the agreements also include provisions that make it impossible for them to be voided except with the consent of “both parties.”

通常认为理解的备忘录通常被认为是无约束力的，但是协议还包括规定，除非同意“双方”，否则使他们不可能做出作业。

“I plan on pursuing legally to exercise my claim to retrieve 2.5% of tokens,” Thapaliya, who was tagged a “shadow founder” by employees of Movement Labs, has said.

“我计划合法地追求我的主张，以检索2.5％的代币，”被运动实验室员工标记为“影子创始人”的Thapaliya说。

His name also came up in internal communications regarding Movement’s deal with Web3Port, a Chinese market maker that was later blamed for dumping $38 million in tokens after MOVE’s debut.

他的名字也出现在内部沟通中，涉及运动与中国做市商Web3port的交易，后来被指责为在Move的首次亮相后将3800万美元投入令牌。

Vinit Parekh is the second name that came up in the subject of shadow founders linked to Movement Labs. CoinDesk claims a 2023 agreement saw Movement Labs agree to give Vinit Parekh’s “Digital Incubation Group” $50,000 annually for every $1 million raised by Movement Labs.

Vinit Parekh是与运动实验室相关的影子创始人主题中出现的第二个名字。 Coindesk声称，一项2023年的协议SEW Engive Labs同意为Vinit Parekh的“数字孵化集团”提供50,000美元，每100万美元由运动实验室筹集。

There was also another agreement that granted a separate Parekh entity control of 2.5% of the MOVE token supply.

还有另一项协议授予了一个单独的Parekh实体控制权，即MOVE MOVE供应量的2.5％。

In exchange for his allocation, Parekh’s firm, Digital Incubation Group, was tasked with several things, including the development of strategy framework, tokenomics, and engaging in structuring team pre-product launch.

为了换取他的分配，Parekh的公司Digital Invubation Group的任务是几件事，包括制定战略框架，Tokenomics，并参与构建团队预生产前的启动。

Parekh’s agreements were also structured as memoranda of understanding with a termination clause requiring consent from both “parties.” However, Parekh and Movement Labs have tagged the agreements exploratory and claimed that funds never changed hands between either party.

Parekh的协议还以终止条款为本条款构成，以备忘录，要求双方同意。但是，帕雷克（Parekh）和运动实验室已经标记了协议的探索性，并声称资金从未在任何一方之间易手。

Nevertheless, sources close to Movement Labs have said that Parekh, a Microsoft product manager turned blockchain industry consultant, was a constant presence at Movement’s San Francisco office.

尽管如此，接近运动实验室的消息人士说，微软产品经理变成区块链行业顾问Parekh一直是运动旧金山办公室的业务。

However, unlike Thapaliya, Parekh has claimed the arrangement was out of love for the ecosystem and that no money has changed hands between his party or Movement Labs.

但是，与Thapaliya不同，Parekh声称这种安排是对生态系统的热爱，并且在他的政党或运动实验室之间没有任何钱。

The fallout from the scandal has now drawn attention to the widening rift between its co-founders, Manche and Scanlon.

现在，丑闻的后果引起了人们对联合创始人Manche和Scanlon之间不断扩大的裂痕的关注。

After an excerpt from one of the Thapaliya agreements leaked on X, Manche highlighted his former partner’s role in approving the deal by pointing to Scanlon’s signature on the memo. He also shared

在X泄露的Thapaliya协议之一的摘录之后，Manche强调了他的前伴侣在批准这笔交易中的角色，指出了Scanlon在备忘录上的签名。他也分享