加密企業家賈斯汀·孫（Justin Sun）是與唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）共進晚餐的方式，是執法部門的熟悉面孔

我們現在知道誰贏得了比賽，通過購買加密貨幣來與唐納德·特朗普總統一起參加親密晚宴 - 他是證券和交易委員會監管機構和執法人員的熟悉面孔。

A Chinese-born crypto entrepreneur is the person who bought the most of President Donald Trump's new meme coin to earn an invitation to an intimate dinner with the president at a crypto gala this week, the entrepreneur confirmed Tuesday.

企業家週二證實，一位出生於中國出生的加密企業家是購買唐納德·特朗普總統新的模因硬幣的大多數人，本週在一個加密貨幣晚會上與總統的親密晚餐邀請。

Justin Sun, who was charged by U.S. regulators this year with market manipulation and offering unregistered securities, said on X that he was the account, labeled "SUN," invited to the president's table.

賈斯汀·孫（Justin Sun）今年被美國監管機構（Austin Sun）指控，並在X上說，他是該帳戶，被標記為“太陽”，被邀請到總統的餐桌上。

"Honored to support @POTUS and grateful for the invitation from @GetTrumpMemes to attend President Trump’s Gala Dinner as his TOP fan!" Sun wrote. "As the top holder of $TRUMP, I’m excited to connect with everyone, talk crypto, and discuss the future of our industry."

“很榮幸能夠支持@potus，並感謝@gettrumpmemes的邀請參加特朗普總統的盛大晚宴，這是他的頂級粉絲！”太陽寫道。 “作為特朗普的最高持有人，我很高興能與所有人建立聯繫，談論加密貨幣，並討論我們行業的未來。”

He capped the post with an American flag emoji.

他用美國國旗表情符號封頂。

The dinner contest, announced last week, sparked criticism from government ethics experts, who said it could be unconstitutional for the president to accept anything of value from foreign nationals. Several critics said the contest was a blatant opportunity for corruption.

上周宣布的晚宴大賽引發了政府倫理專家的批評，他說總統接受外國國民有價值的任何東西可能是違憲的。幾位批評家說，這場比賽是腐敗的公然機會。

Trump has not publicly commented on the accusations, and the Office of Government Ethics declined to comment. A White House official did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

特朗普沒有公開對指控發表評論，政府道德辦公室拒絕置評。白宮官員周二沒有立即回應置評請求。

The president has not been as aggressive in directly promoting cryptocurrencies as some campaign backers in the industry had hoped. But his administration has abandoned or paused many pending cases that had been brought against crypto entrepreneurs and businesses. Among them was a suit that began in 2022 by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

總統在直接促進加密貨幣方面並沒有像該行業中一些競選支持者所希望的那樣積極進取。但是他的政府放棄或暫停了許多針對加密企業家和企業的懸而未決的案件。其中包括一項由美國證券交易委員會（Securities and Exchange Commission）於2022年開始的訴訟。

The agency, now fully controlled by Trump appointees, announced in February that it was placing a 60-day pause on the case in order to seek a resolution.

該機構現在由特朗普任命的人完全控制，並於2月宣布，該機構正在對此案進行60天的停頓，以尋求解決方案。

Earlier in 2023, regulators had sought various injunctions against Sun that would have largely prevented him from participating in crypto in the U.S. Tech industry website The Verge had also reported that Sun was the target of an FBI investigation.

2023年早些時候，監管機構尋求針對太陽的各種禁令，這些禁令在很大程度上阻止了他在美國科技行業網站上參加加密貨幣，這是Verge還報告說，太陽是聯邦調查局調查的目標。

The SEC case arose after a U.S. judge overseeing a case against the Trump administration over its travel ban on citizens from several Muslim-majority countries said he was impressed by an argument from Trump administration attorneys that was part of a broader case against a crypto entrepreneur.

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）的案件是在美國法官對特朗普政府（Trump Administration）的一項案件進行訴訟之後，該案件因其對穆斯林多數多數國家的公民的旅行禁令而表示，他對特朗普政府律師的辯論給他留下了深刻的印象，這是針對加密企業家的更廣泛案件的一部分。

That case began in 2017, when the Trump administration was sued by several technology trade groups after it moved to restrict the use of government-issued software licenses, known as Key Technology Integration Lists.

該案件始於2017年，當時特朗普政府在限制了使用政府發行的軟件許可證（稱為關鍵技術集成列表）的使用後被多個技術貿易集團起訴。

After Trump administration attorneys argued that the government should be allowed to broadly restrict the use of U.S. technology, the judge said he was persuaded by the argument and varied his ruling.

在特朗普政府律師辯稱，應允許政府廣泛限制美國技術的使用時，法官說，他被這一論點說服了，並改變了他的裁決。

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which vacated the lower court ruling and sent the case back to the appeals court to consider the broader legal question of whether the government can, without congressional approval, impose sweeping restrictions on the use of U.S. technology.

該案一直延伸到最高法院，該法院撤消了下級法院的裁決，並將案件送回上訴法院，以考慮更廣泛的法律問題，即政府是否可以在未經國會批准的情況下施加對美國技術使用的全面限制。

That case was eventually settled, but not before the Trump administration’s argument had a knock-on effect on another case: the SEC’s suit against Sun.

該案最終得出了解決，但在特朗普政府的論點對另一個案件產生敲門作用之前：SEC針對Sun的訴訟。

After a lower court judge ruled against the SEC and vacated a preliminary injunction, the agency moved to the appeals court, where it was largely successful.

在下級法官對SEC裁定並撤消了初步禁令後，該機構搬到了上訴法院，該法院在很大程度上取得了成功。

In April 2023, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely upheld lower court rulings that blocked the SEC from immediately banning Sun from participating in crypto in the U.S. But the appeals court did rule that the lower court erred in part by not granting a permanent injunction against Sun.

2023年4月，美國第9巡迴上訴法院的三名法官小組在很大程度上維持了下級法院的裁決，該裁決阻止了SEC立即禁止太陽參加美國的加密貨幣，但上訴法院確實裁定，下級法院部分犯了部分犯錯，部分原因是，下級法院部分犯了錯誤。

The appeals court said the lower court should have granted a permanent injunction to stop Sun from violating U.S. securities law by offering and selling unregistered securities.

上訴法院說，下級法院應該批准永久禁令，以阻止太陽通過提供和出售未註冊的證券來違反美國證券法。

The appeals court also said the lower court should have granted a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in market manipulation.

上訴法院還表示，下級法院應該批准永久禁令，以阻止太陽進行市場操縱。

The appeals court did not rule on the part of the lower court ruling that granted a preliminary injunction to stop the SEC from seeking an injunction that would have banned Sun from engaging in crypto market-making activities.

上訴法院沒有裁定下級法院裁定，該裁決批准了一項初步禁令，以阻止SEC尋求禁止太陽從事加密貨幣營銷活動的禁令。

The appeals court also did not rule on the part of the lower court ruling that granted a preliminary injunction to stop the SEC from seeking an injunction that would have banned Sun from engaging in crypto derivatives trading.

上訴法院還沒有裁定下級法院裁決，該裁決授予了初步禁令，以阻止SEC尋求禁止太陽從事加密衍生品交易的禁令。

The appeals court did rule that the lower court erred in part by not granting a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in crypto mining.

上訴法院確實裁定，下級法院不授予永久禁令以阻止太陽從事加密礦業開採。

The appeals court said the lower court should have granted a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in crypto lending.

上訴法院說，下級法院應該授予永久禁令，以阻止太陽從事加密貸款。

The appeals court did rule that the lower court erred in part by not granting a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in crypto futures trading.

上訴法院確實裁定，下級法院不授予永久禁令以阻止太陽從事加密期貨交易而犯錯。

The appeals court said the appeals court should have granted a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in crypto options trading.

上訴法院說，上訴法院應該授予永久禁令，以阻止太陽從事加密貨幣期權交易。

The appeals court did rule that the lower court erred in part by not granting a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in crypto exchange-linked notes trading.

上訴法院確實裁定，下級法院不授予永久禁令以阻止太陽從事加密貨幣交易票據交易的部分犯錯。

The appeals court said the appeals court should have granted a permanent injunction to stop Sun from engaging in crypto structured products

上訴法院說，上訴法院應該授予永久禁令，以阻止太陽從事加密貨幣製成產品