越來越多的關注已成為BTC空間，這是對比特幣核心的新更新

這場對話正在發生，就像大型機構對比特幣表現出更大的興趣一樣。本週早些時候，MicroStrategy以$ 1420000000的價格購買了15355 BTC

A new update to Bitcoin Core, the software that powers most of the top coin’s nodes, is being questioned by key developers. The proposed change, which will affect how transactions are shared across the network, draws strong reactions. Many believe that if adopted, it could threaten the core of Bitcoin.

關鍵開發人員質疑比特幣核心的新更新，該軟件是為大多數頂級硬幣節點提供動力的軟件。提出的變更將影響整個網絡共享交易的方式，會引起強烈的反應。許多人認為，如果被採用，它可能威脅到比特幣的核心。

What is the Controversial Bitcoin Core Update

有爭議的比特幣核心更新是什麼

Jason Hughes, a known figure in the BTC development space, recently expressed his concerns over a pull request on Bitcoin Core. This change would affect the transaction relay policy. It concerns how unconfirmed transactions move through the system before being recorded on the blockchain.

傑森·休斯（Jason Hughes）是BTC開發領域的知名人物，最近對比特幣核心的拉力要求表示關注。此更改將影響交易繼電器政策。它涉及未經證實的交易如何在系統上記錄在區塊鏈上之前如何通過系統移動。

Hughes explained that it could let gigabytes of non-Bitcoin data pass through the network if approved. This would increase the size of the blockchain and make it harder for individual nodes to keep up. It could also lead to slower transaction processing.

休斯解釋說，如果獲得批准，它可以讓非比幣數據的千兆字節通過網絡。這將增加區塊鏈的大小，並使單個節點更難跟上。這也可能導致交易處理較慢。

Hughes described this problem as blockchain bloat, which is far from Satoshi Nakamoto’s original intentions. In his view, this kind of data overload may push Bitcoin away from its original design as a currency. He suggested that the community should consider Bitcoin Knots instead, a stricter version of the software maintained by Luke Dashjr.

休斯將這個問題描述為區塊鏈膨脹，遠非納卡摩的原始意圖。在他看來，這種數據過載可能會將比特幣從原始設計中推開。他建議社區應該考慮比特幣結，這是Luke Dashjr維護的軟件的更嚴格版本。

According to Hughes, this version does not allow such loose transaction handling and would better protect the network. He also called crypto mining giants like AntPool and ViaBTC to reject the update to preserve Bitcoin’s function.

根據休斯（Hughes）的說法，此版本不允許這樣的寬鬆的交易處理，並且可以更好地保護網絡。他還稱Crypto採礦巨頭（如Antpool和ViaBTC）拒絕更新以保留比特幣功能。

Community Stakeholders Reacts

社區利益相關者做出反應

Another longtime developer, Peter Todd, responded to the debate on X. He pointed out that, while more conservative, Bitcoin Knots still allows spam-like transactions inside blocks.

另一位長期的開發商彼得·托德（Peter Todd）對X上的辯論做出了回應。他指出，儘管更保守，比特幣結仍然允許在塊內進行類似垃圾郵件的交易。

Todd suggested that a soft fork, a backward-compatible network change, might be the only way to block nonfinancial data on the blockchain. He recommended new rules allowing only valid hash digests or public keys in transactions. This would make pushing junk data onto the chain harder, as it would now come with a computational cost.

托德（Todd）建議，軟叉（向後兼容的網絡變化）可能是阻止區塊鏈非財務數據的唯一方法。他建議新的規則，只允許有效的哈希摘要或交易中的公共鑰匙。這將使將垃圾數據推到鏈條上，因為現在它將帶來計算成本。

Still, he admitted this would not stop all spam, especially those tied to token trades. Some developers, like Antoine Poinsot, disagreed, arguing the issue was being overstated.

儘管如此，他承認這不會阻止所有垃圾郵件，尤其是那些與代幣交易相關的垃圾郵件。一些開發人員（例如Antoine Puinsot）不同意，認為這個問題被誇大了。

Bitcoin and Institutional Adoption: Is Centralization at Risk?

比特幣和機構採用：集中化是否處於危險之中？

This conversation is happening just as big institutions show greater interest in Bitcoin. Earlier this week, MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) bought 15,355 BTC for $1.42 billion, a move other firms have also adopted.

這場對話正在發生，就像大型機構對比特幣表現出更大的興趣一樣。本週早些時候，MicroStrategy（NASDAQ：MSTR）以14.2億美元的價格購買了15,355 BTC，其他公司也採用了一項行動。

While many welcome institutional money’s stability, others worry that it gives more control to a few players. Bitcoin’s promise of decentralization could be weakened if only a small group of firms makes key decisions, from software updates to mining operations. The recent debate over Bitcoin Core highlights how important it is to guard the network’s core values even as it grows in popularity.

儘管許多人歡迎機構貨幣的穩定性，但其他人則擔心它為一些球員提供了更多的控制權。如果只有一小部分公司從軟件更新到採礦業務，比特幣的權力下放承諾可能會削弱。最近關於比特幣核心的辯論突出了守護網絡的核心價值觀的重要性，即使它在受歡迎程度上也不斷增長。