越来越多的关注已成为BTC空间，这是对比特币核心的新更新

这场对话正在发生，就像大型机构对比特币表现出更大的兴趣一样。本周早些时候，MicroStrategy以$ 1420000000的价格购买了15355 BTC

A new update to Bitcoin Core, the software that powers most of the top coin’s nodes, is being questioned by key developers. The proposed change, which will affect how transactions are shared across the network, draws strong reactions. Many believe that if adopted, it could threaten the core of Bitcoin.

关键开发人员质疑比特币核心的新更新，该软件是为大多数顶级硬币节点提供动力的软件。提出的变更将影响整个网络共享交易的方式，会引起强烈的反应。许多人认为，如果被采用，它可能威胁到比特币的核心。

What is the Controversial Bitcoin Core Update

有争议的比特币核心更新是什么

Jason Hughes, a known figure in the BTC development space, recently expressed his concerns over a pull request on Bitcoin Core. This change would affect the transaction relay policy. It concerns how unconfirmed transactions move through the system before being recorded on the blockchain.

杰森·休斯（Jason Hughes）是BTC开发领域的知名人物，最近对比特币核心的拉力要求表示关注。此更改将影响交易继电器政策。它涉及未经证实的交易如何在系统上记录在区块链上之前如何通过系统移动。

Hughes explained that it could let gigabytes of non-Bitcoin data pass through the network if approved. This would increase the size of the blockchain and make it harder for individual nodes to keep up. It could also lead to slower transaction processing.

休斯解释说，如果获得批准，它可以让非比币数据的千兆字节通过网络。这将增加区块链的大小，并使单个节点更难跟上。这也可能导致交易处理较慢。

Hughes described this problem as blockchain bloat, which is far from Satoshi Nakamoto’s original intentions. In his view, this kind of data overload may push Bitcoin away from its original design as a currency. He suggested that the community should consider Bitcoin Knots instead, a stricter version of the software maintained by Luke Dashjr.

休斯将这个问题描述为区块链膨胀，远非纳卡摩的原始意图。在他看来，这种数据过载可能会将比特币从原始设计中推开。他建议社区应该考虑比特币结，这是Luke Dashjr维护的软件的更严格版本。

According to Hughes, this version does not allow such loose transaction handling and would better protect the network. He also called crypto mining giants like AntPool and ViaBTC to reject the update to preserve Bitcoin’s function.

根据休斯（Hughes）的说法，此版本不允许这样的宽松的交易处理，并且可以更好地保护网络。他还称Crypto采矿巨头（如Antpool和ViaBTC）拒绝更新以保留比特币功能。

Community Stakeholders Reacts

社区利益相关者做出反应

Another longtime developer, Peter Todd, responded to the debate on X. He pointed out that, while more conservative, Bitcoin Knots still allows spam-like transactions inside blocks.

另一位长期的开发商彼得·托德（Peter Todd）对X上的辩论做出了回应。他指出，尽管更保守，比特币结仍然允许在块内进行类似垃圾邮件的交易。

Todd suggested that a soft fork, a backward-compatible network change, might be the only way to block nonfinancial data on the blockchain. He recommended new rules allowing only valid hash digests or public keys in transactions. This would make pushing junk data onto the chain harder, as it would now come with a computational cost.

托德（Todd）建议，软叉（向后兼容的网络变化）可能是阻止区块链非财务数据的唯一方法。他建议新的规则，只允许有效的哈希摘要或交易中的公共钥匙。这将使将垃圾数据推到链条上，因为现在它将带来计算成本。

Still, he admitted this would not stop all spam, especially those tied to token trades. Some developers, like Antoine Poinsot, disagreed, arguing the issue was being overstated.

尽管如此，他承认这不会阻止所有垃圾邮件，尤其是那些与代币交易相关的垃圾邮件。一些开发人员（例如Antoine Puinsot）不同意，认为这个问题被夸大了。

Bitcoin and Institutional Adoption: Is Centralization at Risk?

比特币和机构采用：集中化是否处于危险之中？

This conversation is happening just as big institutions show greater interest in Bitcoin. Earlier this week, MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) bought 15,355 BTC for $1.42 billion, a move other firms have also adopted.

这场对话正在发生，就像大型机构对比特币表现出更大的兴趣一样。本周早些时候，MicroStrategy（NASDAQ：MSTR）以14.2亿美元的价格购买了15,355 BTC，其他公司也采用了一项行动。

While many welcome institutional money’s stability, others worry that it gives more control to a few players. Bitcoin’s promise of decentralization could be weakened if only a small group of firms makes key decisions, from software updates to mining operations. The recent debate over Bitcoin Core highlights how important it is to guard the network’s core values even as it grows in popularity.

尽管许多人欢迎机构货币的稳定性，但其他人则担心它为一些球员提供了更多的控制权。如果只有一小部分公司从软件更新到采矿业务，比特币的权力下放承诺可能会削弱。最近关于比特币核心的辩论突出了守护网络的核心价值观的重要性，即使它在受欢迎程度上也不断增长。