與比特幣的工作證明系統相比

根據加密貨幣領域領先的研究人員的最新見解，以太坊的驗證驗證設計可能比比特幣的工作證明系統更強大地防禦攻擊。

output: Ethereum's transition to a proof-of-stake system may have left it with a stronger defense against attacks than Bitcoin's proof-of-work system, despite the flagship cryptocurrency's purportedly higher levels of decentralization, according to recent insights from leading researchers in the crypto space.

輸出：儘管旗艦加密貨幣據稱的權力下放，但以太坊向驗證系統的過渡可能使對攻擊的防禦能力比比特幣的工作證明系統更為強烈。

At present, an analysis by Justin Drake, a prominent researcher at Ethereum Foundation, has illuminated the varying costs associated with launching a so-called 51% attack on the two largest blockchains.

目前，以太坊基金會的著名研究員賈斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）的分析闡明了與對兩個最大區塊鏈發動51％攻擊相關的不同成本。

According to Drake's calculations, compromising Bitcoin's blockchain would require an estimated $10 billion, while a similar disruption of Ethereum would cost roughly $45 billion, factoring in the cost of acquiring a majority of the staked ETH.

根據Drake的計算，損害比特幣的區塊鏈估計需要100億美元，而類似的以太坊的中斷將花費約450億美元，這考慮了獲得大部分固定ETH的成本。

However, this figure could be as low as $15 billion if an attacker were to seize control of the largest staking pools. At present, there are 300 large staking pools, each securing around 32 ETH, in addition to the vast number of smaller stakers.

但是，如果攻擊者抓住對最大的積分池的控制權，這個數字可能低至150億美元。目前，除了大量的較小的Stakers之外，還有300個大型堆放池，每個池均獲得32張ETH。

This difference in attack costs, Drake suggests, gives Ethereum a superior long-term security posture, especially as staking volume grows.

Drake認為，這種攻擊成本的差異使以太坊具有出色的長期安全姿勢，尤其是隨著放入量的增長。

Grant Hummer, co-founder of blockchain startup Etherealize, also touched upon the issue, noting that Bitcoin's security budget is diminishing, rendering it more vulnerable as block rewards decline and the cost of hardware increases.

區塊鏈初創公司Etherealize的聯合創始人Grant Hummer也談到了這個問題，並指出比特幣的安全預算正在減少，隨著區塊獎勵的下降和硬件成本的增加，它變得更加脆弱。

"Right now, the cost to attack Bitcoin is about $10 billion, but as the total node count increases, and as the cost of hardware rises, it will become more difficult to launch such an attack," Hummer said.

亨默說：“目前，攻擊比特幣的成本約為100億美元，但是隨著總節點數量的增加，隨著硬件成本的上升，發動這種攻擊將變得越來越困難。”

"However, with the halvings, the rate at which new coins are released declines, and at present, about 65% of Bitcoin's hashrate is covered by a small number of large mining pools."

“但是，隨著中度的變化，釋放新硬幣的速度下降的速度，目前，比特幣的哈希雷特約有65％被少數大型採礦池所覆蓋。”

He projected that over the next decade, the cost of attacking the Bitcoin network could drop to as low as $2 billion- making such a breach far more feasible for a well-funded adversary.

他預計，在接下來的十年中，攻擊比特幣網絡的成本可能會降至20億美元，這對於資金充足的對手來說更為可行。

In contrast, Hummer asserted that Ethereum's more robust economic model and validator infrastructure pose greater challenges for attackers.

相比之下，悍馬斷言，以太坊更強大的經濟模型和驗證者基礎設施對攻擊者提出了更大的挑戰。

"In the case of Ethereum, due to the high level of validator participation and the large capital they contribute, the cost of a 51% attack on Ethereum would be significantly higher- around $45 billion," Hummer added.

Hummer補充說：“在以太坊的情況下，由於驗證者的參與程度很高及其貢獻的大量資本，對以太坊的51％攻擊的成本將大大提高約450億美元。”

"Moreover, due to the decentralized nature of the validator set, it would be an incredibly complex endeavor, requiring an attacker to acquire a majority of the staked ETH."

“此外，由於驗證器集的分散性質，這將是一項非常複雜的努力，要求攻擊者獲得大部分固定的ETH。”

Hummer further argued that Ethereum is better positioned to serve as a decentralized store of value on the internet, thanks to its expanding validator set and high stake-backed security.

Hummer進一步認為，由於其擴大的驗證器集和高利益支持的安全性，以太坊的位置可以更好地成為Internet上的分散價值存儲。

"Despite having fewer users than Bitcoin, Ethereum is displaying greater promise in this domain due to the robust capital backing its validators and the collective efforts of the researchers and developers working tirelessly to maintain the network's integrity."

“儘管用戶的用戶比比特幣少，但由於資本支持其驗證者以及研究人員和開發人員的集體努力，以至於以太坊在該領域表現出更大的希望，而不懈地努力維護網絡的完整性。”

As concerns grow online around Bitcoin's long-term sustainability without rising transaction fees, Ethereum advocates assert that staking-based consensus is better suited to handle future network demands without compromising resilience.

由於關注比特幣的長期可持續性而沒有增加交易費用的擔憂，以太坊倡導者斷言，基於積分的共識更適合在不損害彈性的情況下處理未來的網絡需求。