与比特币的工作证明系统相比

根据加密货币领域领先的研究人员的最新见解，以太坊的验证验证设计可能比比特币的工作证明系统更强大地防御攻击。

output: Ethereum's transition to a proof-of-stake system may have left it with a stronger defense against attacks than Bitcoin's proof-of-work system, despite the flagship cryptocurrency's purportedly higher levels of decentralization, according to recent insights from leading researchers in the crypto space.

输出：尽管旗舰加密货币据称的权力下放，但以太坊向验证系统的过渡可能使对攻击的防御能力比比特币的工作证明系统更为强烈。

At present, an analysis by Justin Drake, a prominent researcher at Ethereum Foundation, has illuminated the varying costs associated with launching a so-called 51% attack on the two largest blockchains.

目前，以太坊基金会的著名研究员贾斯汀·德雷克（Justin Drake）的分析阐明了与对两个最大区块链发动51％攻击相关的不同成本。

According to Drake's calculations, compromising Bitcoin's blockchain would require an estimated $10 billion, while a similar disruption of Ethereum would cost roughly $45 billion, factoring in the cost of acquiring a majority of the staked ETH.

根据Drake的计算，损害比特币的区块链估计需要100亿美元，而类似的以太坊的中断将花费约450亿美元，这考虑了获得大部分固定ETH的成本。

However, this figure could be as low as $15 billion if an attacker were to seize control of the largest staking pools. At present, there are 300 large staking pools, each securing around 32 ETH, in addition to the vast number of smaller stakers.

但是，如果攻击者抓住对最大的积分池的控制权，这个数字可能低至150亿美元。目前，除了大量的较小的Stakers之外，还有300个大型堆放池，每个池均获得32张ETH。

This difference in attack costs, Drake suggests, gives Ethereum a superior long-term security posture, especially as staking volume grows.

Drake认为，这种攻击成本的差异使以太坊具有出色的长期安全姿势，尤其是随着放入量的增长。

Grant Hummer, co-founder of blockchain startup Etherealize, also touched upon the issue, noting that Bitcoin's security budget is diminishing, rendering it more vulnerable as block rewards decline and the cost of hardware increases.

区块链初创公司Etherealize的联合创始人Grant Hummer也谈到了这个问题，并指出比特币的安全预算正在减少，随着区块奖励的下降和硬件成本的增加，它变得更加脆弱。

"Right now, the cost to attack Bitcoin is about $10 billion, but as the total node count increases, and as the cost of hardware rises, it will become more difficult to launch such an attack," Hummer said.

亨默说：“目前，攻击比特币的成本约为100亿美元，但是随着总节点数量的增加，随着硬件成本的上升，发动这种攻击将变得越来越困难。”

"However, with the halvings, the rate at which new coins are released declines, and at present, about 65% of Bitcoin's hashrate is covered by a small number of large mining pools."

“但是，随着中度的变化，释放新硬币的速度下降的速度，目前，比特币的哈希雷特约有65％被少数大型采矿池所覆盖。”

He projected that over the next decade, the cost of attacking the Bitcoin network could drop to as low as $2 billion- making such a breach far more feasible for a well-funded adversary.

他预计，在接下来的十年中，攻击比特币网络的成本可能会降至20亿美元，这对于资金充足的对手来说更为可行。

In contrast, Hummer asserted that Ethereum's more robust economic model and validator infrastructure pose greater challenges for attackers.

相比之下，悍马断言，以太坊更强大的经济模型和验证者基础设施对攻击者提出了更大的挑战。

"In the case of Ethereum, due to the high level of validator participation and the large capital they contribute, the cost of a 51% attack on Ethereum would be significantly higher- around $45 billion," Hummer added.

Hummer补充说：“在以太坊的情况下，由于验证者的参与程度很高及其贡献的大量资本，对以太坊的51％攻击的成本将大大提高约450亿美元。”

"Moreover, due to the decentralized nature of the validator set, it would be an incredibly complex endeavor, requiring an attacker to acquire a majority of the staked ETH."

“此外，由于验证器集的分散性质，这将是一项非常复杂的努力，要求攻击者获得大部分固定的ETH。”

Hummer further argued that Ethereum is better positioned to serve as a decentralized store of value on the internet, thanks to its expanding validator set and high stake-backed security.

Hummer进一步认为，由于其扩大的验证器集和高利益支持的安全性，以太坊的位置可以更好地成为Internet上的分散价值存储。

"Despite having fewer users than Bitcoin, Ethereum is displaying greater promise in this domain due to the robust capital backing its validators and the collective efforts of the researchers and developers working tirelessly to maintain the network's integrity."

“尽管用户的用户比比特币少，但由于资本支持其验证者以及研究人员和开发人员的集体努力，以至于以太坊在该领域表现出更大的希望，而不懈地努力维护网络的完整性。”

As concerns grow online around Bitcoin's long-term sustainability without rising transaction fees, Ethereum advocates assert that staking-based consensus is better suited to handle future network demands without compromising resilience.

由于关注比特币的长期可持续性而没有增加交易费用的担忧，以太坊倡导者断言，基于积分的共识更适合在不损害弹性的情况下处理未来的网络需求。