區塊鏈產業取決於專用區塊鏈的部署和成功

Ava Labs 商務長 (CBO) John Nahas 表示，Web3 產業尚未完全進入主流。

Ava Labs chief business officer (CBO) John Nahas recently shared his thoughts on the blockchain industry’s evolution, the importance of purpose-built blockchains, and effective partnerships among blockchain projects. He also highlighted some regulatory instances that he believes have positively impacted the industry.

Ava Labs 首席商務長 (CBO) John Nahas 最近分享了他對區塊鏈產業發展、專用區塊鏈的重要性以及區塊鏈專案之間有效合作夥伴關係的看法。他還強調了一些他認為對該行業產生了積極影響的監管實例。

In an interview with Bitcoin.com News, Nahas discussed various topics, including the missing element hindering the blockchain industry’s full potential, the difference between general-purpose and purpose-built blockchains, and the essential qualities to seek when building a blockchain development team.

在接受Bitcoin.com News 採訪時，Nahas 討論了各種話題，包括阻礙區塊鏈產業充分發揮潛力的缺失因素、通用區塊鏈和專用區塊鏈之間的區別，以及建立區塊鏈開發團隊時需要尋求的基本素質。

Below are Nahas’ answers to all the questions sent.

以下是納哈斯對所有問題的答案。

Bitcoin.com News (BCN): The decentralized blockchain industry has evolved in phases. Bitcoin’s initial era focused on “alternative money,” while Ethereum emphasized smart contracts and decentralized applications (dapps). Today, Web3 development and third-generation decentralized solutions are at the forefront. However, the industry has not fully entered the mainstream. As a long-time observer, what do you see as missing or hindering the blockchain industry’s full potential?

Bitcoin.com News (BCN)：去中心化區塊鏈產業已經分階段發展。比特幣的最初時代專注於“另類貨幣”，而以太坊則強調智能合約和去中心化應用程式（dapp）。如今，Web3 開發和第三代去中心化解決方案處於最前線。然而，該行業尚未完全進入主流。身為長期觀察者，您認為哪些因素缺失或阻礙了區塊鏈產業的全部潛力？

John Nahas (JN): The current problem with the Web3 space is the constant proliferation of the general-purpose Layer 1 blockchain. Their primary product is their token, and they seek to lure developers and users to their slightly better technology. There are constant incremental improvements at the blockchain layer, which is more blockspace, but there’s not enough innovation.

John Nahas (JN)：Web3 空間目前的問題是通用第 1 層區塊鏈的不斷擴散。他們的主要產品是他們的代幣，他們尋求吸引開發人員和用戶使用他們稍微更好的技術。區塊鏈層不斷進行漸進式改進，也就是更多的區塊空間，但創新不夠。

The solution to this problem, and what has been missing, is the rise of purpose-built blockchains (or application chains). The future will be multi-chain, however, a plethora of general-purpose chains does not solve the unique needs of projects building across a variety of sectors, from banking to gaming to AI to consumer. Purpose-built chains –which are an asset, jurisdiction, compliance, and use case specific –are needed to scale the numerous use cases. This will lead to mass adoption. No single chain can absorb all the potential demand, and we’ve seen that general-purpose chains alone have failed to deliver a solution the market needs to expand.

這個問題的解決方案以及一直缺少的方案是專用區塊鏈（或應用程式鏈）的興起。未來將是多鏈的，然而，過多的通用鏈並不能解決跨多個領域（從銀行、遊戲、人工智慧到消費者）建立專案的獨特需求。需要專門建置的鏈（資產、管轄權、合規性和特定用例）來擴展眾多用例。這將導致大規模採用。沒有任何一條鏈可以吸收所有潛在需求，而且我們已經看到，僅靠通用鏈無法提供市場擴展所需的解決方案。

BCN: General-purpose and purpose-built blockchains have both found success, but purpose-built chains are currently gaining significant attention. Can you explain the difference between the two and what problems they address that general-purpose blockchains cannot?

BCN：通用和專用區塊鏈都取得了成功，但專用鏈目前正受到廣泛關注。您能解釋一下兩者之間的差異以及它們解決了哪些通用區塊鏈無法解決的問題嗎？

JN: General purpose blockchains provide “slight” improvements over existing Layer 1 chains, but they do not meet the demand of all the use cases, businesses, and scale that is needed to make blockchains go mainstream.

JN：通用區塊鏈對現有的第 1 層鏈進行了「輕微」改進，但它們無法滿足區塊鏈成為主流所需的所有用例、業務和規模的需求。

However, purpose-built chains (previously called application-specific, or app chains) are where the industry is inevitably going. Purpose-built chains can accommodate specific uses, manage fees, use specific virtual machines (VMs), have their own gas token (or no gas token), and are customizable to the particular requirements of the business, asset, jurisdiction, and developer. They are needed solutions to fix technical bottlenecks, whereas general purpose chains (and their excess) are oftentimes solutions in search of a problem.

然而，專用鏈（以前稱為特定應用程式或應用程式鏈）是該行業不可避免的發展方向。專門建構的鏈可以適應特定用途、管理費用、使用特定虛擬機器(VM)、擁有自己的Gas 代幣（或沒有Gas 代幣），並且可以根據業務、資產、司法管轄區和開發人員的特定要求進行客製化。它們是解決技術瓶頸所需的解決方案，而通用鏈（及其多餘的）通常是尋找問題的解決方案。

BCN: As the blockchain industry continues to evolve, participants will increasingly form partnerships to enhance the user experience or leverage each other’s strengths. Can you briefly explain the essential elements for effective partnerships among blockchain projects, and highlight some common reasons for failed partnerships?

BCN：隨著區塊鏈產業的不斷發展，參與者將越來越多地結成合作夥伴關係，以增強用戶體驗或發揮彼此的優勢。您能否簡要解釋區塊鏈專案之間有效合作的基本要素，並強調合作失敗的一些常見原因？

JN: Most failed projects had an outsized focus on the headline and the name recognition and association that came with it. They made news but did not solve a problem. We saw this for a couple of years, where a company or a builder would have a great idea and then say “put on blockchain” like it was a special ingredient or an automatic bonus. The blockchain element should facilitate the use case, and be the technology that allows for a product or asset to succeed, not the highlight.

JN：大多數失敗的項目都過度專注於標題以及隨之而來的知名度和關聯性。他們製造了新聞，但沒有解決問題。我們已經看到這種情況好幾年了，公司或建築商會有一個好主意，然後說“採用區塊鏈”，就像它是一種特殊成分或自動獎金一樣。區塊鏈元素應該促進用例，並且是允許產品或資產成功的技術，而不是亮點。

Effective partnerships are built around three key components: technology, team, and incentives. If a team is building a successful product, they should look for the best technology to facilitate that product – that is the foundational decision. After the tech, the team you work with is as important, if not more important, than the tech. People like working with people they like, and if there is a good relationship that is built on trust and clear goals, then the likelihood of success is much higher. If these two tenets are there, then the incentive (financial or support) is easy since both sides have a shared goal of winning. However, we often see teams in this space chase the incentive first, which is the wrong priority.

有效的合作夥伴關係是圍繞著三個關鍵組成部分建立的：技術、團隊和激勵措施。如果一個團隊正在建立一個成功的產品，他們應該尋找最好的技術來促進該產品的發展——這是一個基本的決定。除了技術之外，與您一起工作的團隊與技術同樣重要，甚至更重要。人們喜歡與自己喜歡的人一起工作，如果建立在信任和明確目標之上的良好關係，那麼成功的可能性就會高得多。如果這兩個原則都存在，那麼激勵（經濟或支持）就很容易，因為雙方都有共同的獲勝目標。然而，我們經常看到這個領域的團隊首先追求激勵，這是錯誤的優先順序。

BCN: Many analysts believe blockchain projects are only as strong as their teams. As a seasoned blockchain industry veteran involved in multiple projects and teams, what are the essential qualities to seek when building a team? What factors contribute to a successful blockchain development team that can drive ecosystem growth and broader adoption of blockchain projects?

BCN：許多分析師認為，區塊鏈專案的實力取決於其團隊的實力。身為參與多個專案、多個團隊的區塊鏈產業資深人士，在組建團隊時需要具備哪些基本素質？哪些因素有助於區塊鏈開發團隊成功，從而推動生態系統的發展和區塊鏈專案的更廣泛採用？

JN: Two things stand out the most – curiosity and hustle. These are the soft skills that often cannot be learned on the job. Technical, operational, and informational skills can be learned

JN：有兩件事最突出——好奇心和忙碌。這些是通常無法在工作中學到的軟技能。技術、操作和資訊技能是可以學習的