比特幣SV（BSV）投資者更新反托拉斯訴訟

當原告試圖推翻先前的法院裁決時，比特幣SV投資者與加密貨幣交易所二進制之間的長期衝突已經進入了新階段。

A group of Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors are continuing to assert that cryptocurrency exchange Binance’s decision to remove BSV from its platform caused substantial market damage to the cryptocurrency, according to a report by AMB Crypto.

根據Amb Crypto的一份報告，一組比特幣SV（BSV）投資者繼續斷言，加密貨幣交易所Binance從其平台中刪除BSV的決定造成了嚴重的市場損失，對加密貨幣造成了重大損失。

The investors, who are attempting to overturn a prior court decision, are arguing that the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) failed to properly consider the full economic impact of the delisting action when making its ruling in July.

試圖推翻先前法院裁決的投資者認為，英國競爭上訴法庭（CAT）在7月份作出裁決時未能適當地考慮這項挑剔行動的全部經濟影響。

Multi-billion pound claim at stake

數十億英鎊的索賠

The case, which is being brought by a coalition of BSV holders, could result in one of the largest damages claims in cryptocurrency history. The BSV investors are seeking compensation of more than £10 billion ($13 billion) for alleged market manipulation and anti-competitive behavior by Binance.

該案是由BSV持有人聯盟提起的，可能會導致加密貨幣歷史上最大的損害賠償要求之一。 BSV投資者正在尋求超過100億英鎊（130億美元）的賠償，以涉嫌通過Binance進行市場操縱和反競爭行為。

The case began in 2019 when Binance delisted BSV from its exchange. The decision was part of a broader industry discussion about the coin’s founder, Craig Wright, and his claims to be the true inventor of Bitcoin.

該案始於2019年，當時Binance將BSV從其交換中脫穎而出。該決定是關於硬幣的創始人克雷格·賴特（Craig Wright）的更廣泛行業討論的一部分，他的聲稱是比特幣的真正發明者。

Several other major exchanges, including Huobi and OKEx, also delisted BSV in the months that followed. At the time, the exchange said that its listing policies are applied consistently based on technical merit and community standards.

在隨後的幾個月中，包括Huobi和Okex在內的其他幾次主要交易所也使BSV脫穎而出。當時，交易所表示，其上市政策是根據技術優點和社區標準始終應用的。

However, the BSV investors argued that the delisting was a targeted action that was intended to cause economic harm to BSV holders.

但是，BSV投資者認為，這種選擇是旨在對BSV持有人造成經濟損害的目標行動。

CAT to reconsider delisting decision

貓重新考慮推薦決定

The CAT dismissed the BSV investors’ claim in July, ruling that the delisting decision was not an abuse of dominant position. The court also held that the delisting decision was not anti-competitive.

貓在7月份駁回了BSV投資者的主張，裁定脫穎而出的決定不是濫用主導地位。法院還裁定，這項挑剔的決定不是反競爭的。

However, the BSV investors have now applied to appeal the CAT’s decision. In their application, the BSV investors argued that the CAT failed to adequately consider the evidence of the substantial market damage that was caused by the delisting decision.

但是，BSV投資者現在已申請對貓的決定提出上訴。 BSV投資者在其應用中認為，這隻貓未能充分考慮由推遲決定造成的重大市場損失的證據。

The BSV investors are also arguing that the CAT erred in holding that the delisting decision was not an abuse of dominant position.

BSV投資者還爭辯說，貓認為，忠誠的決定不是濫用主導地位。

The case is still pending and could take several more months to be decided. The outcome of the case will have important implications for the cryptocurrency industry.

該案仍在審理中，可能還需要幾個月的時間才能決定。案件的結果將對加密貨幣行業產生重要影響。

The case will determine whether exchanges have the power to decide which cryptocurrencies are available to traders and whether delisting decisions can be considered anti-competitive practices under existing regulatory frameworks.

案件將確定交易所是否有權確定對交易者可用的加密貨幣，以及在現有監管框架下是否可以將其視為反競爭實踐。

It will also decide if the BSV investors can bring a claim for collective economic harm.

它還將決定BSV投資者是否可以提出集體經濟傷害的要求。

The case is being watched closely by industry insiders, who are interested to see how the British courts will handle this novel legal issue. It could set a precedent for future cases of cryptocurrency fraud and manipulation.

行業內部人士密切關注此案，他們有興趣了解英國法院將如何處理這個新穎的法律問題。它可能為將來的加密貨幣欺詐和操縱案件樹立先例。