閃電網絡是“巨大失敗”嗎？ Paul Sztorc和Alex Gladstein在比特幣的擴展解決方案上發生了衝突。參與辯論！

Bitcoin Scaling Showdown: Lightning Network, Sztorc, and the Future of Payments

比特幣縮放攤牌：閃電網絡，sztorc和付款的未來

The Bitcoin scaling debate rages on! Is the Lightning Network living up to its promise, or is it, as Paul Sztorc claims, a “giant failure”? This blog post dives into the heart of the matter, exploring the key arguments surrounding Bitcoin scaling, the Lightning Network, and the perspectives of figures like Paul Sztorc and Alex Gladstein.

比特幣縮放辯論激烈！閃電網絡是否符合其諾言，還是正如保羅·斯托克（Paul Sztorc）所說，是“巨大的失敗”？這篇博客文章深入介紹了問題的核心，探討了圍繞比特幣縮放，閃電網絡以及Paul Sztorc和Alex Gladstein等人物的觀點的關鍵論點。

The Great Scaling Debate: A Quick Recap

大規模辯論：快速回顧

Back in the day, from 2015 to 2017 to be exact, the Bitcoin community was locked in a heated debate about how to scale Bitcoin payments to a global audience. Some folks wanted a hard fork to increase on-chain capacity. Others, like the Bitcoin Core contributors, favored maximizing the existing block space. The compromise? Segregated Witness (SegWit), which paved the way for the Lightning Network as a second-layer payment solution.

從2015年到2017年，確切地說，比特幣社區陷入了有關如何將比特幣支付擴展到全球觀眾的激烈辯論中。有些人希望一個艱難的叉子來增加鏈上的能力。其他人，例如比特幣核心貢獻者，都讚成最大化現有的塊空間。妥協？隔離的證人（Segwit），為雷電網絡作為第二層支付解決方案鋪平了道路。

Sztorc vs. Gladstein: A Clash of Visions

Sztorc vs. Gladstein：一系列異象

Paul Sztorc, drivechain inventor and LayerTwo Labs CEO, hasn't held back on his criticism of the Lightning Network. He sees it as fundamentally flawed and not scalable in the long run. On the other side, Alex Gladstein of the Human Rights Foundation champions the Lightning Network's current utility, pointing to its real-world applications and the value it brings to users today.

Drivechain發明家兼Layertwo Labs首席執行官Paul Sztorc並沒有拒絕他對閃電網絡的批評。從長遠來看，他認為它從根本上是有缺陷的，並且不可擴展。另一方面，人權基金會的亞歷克斯·格拉德斯坦（Alex Gladstein）擁護著閃電網絡的當前公用事業，指出了其現實世界中的應用程序及其為當今用戶帶來的價值。

Gladstein's Perspective: Real-World Impact

格拉德斯坦的觀點：現實世界的影響

Gladstein highlights the Lightning Network's adoption in areas like Nostr Zaps, integration by major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, and the upcoming integration for Square merchants. He also emphasizes its importance in regions where Bitcoin's lack of KYC/AML restrictions is a lifeline for those who need it most. He argues that the network's usability has drastically improved over the past few years.

格拉德斯坦（Gladstein）強調了閃電網絡在NOSTR ZAPS等領域的採用，Binance和Coinbase等主要交易所的集成以及即將進行的Square Merchants集成。他還強調了它在比特幣缺乏KYC/AML限制的地區的重要性，對於最需要它的人來說是生命線。他認為，在過去的幾年中，網絡的可用性已大大提高。

Sztorc's Counterpoint: Long-Term Scalability Concerns

SZTORC的對立面：長期可伸縮性問題

Sztorc dismisses these examples as short-sighted. He argues that the Lightning Network struggles under pressure, citing the increased fees caused by Ordinals Inscriptions as an example. He points out that reverting to the Bitcoin blockchain or opening a low-balance channel becomes uneconomical during high-fee periods.

Sztorc將這些例子視為短視。他認為，閃電網絡在壓力下掙扎，理由是由序數銘文引起的費用增加。他指出，恢復比特幣區塊鍊或打開低體積渠道在高費期間變得不經濟。

Drivechains: Sztorc's Alternative Solution

Drivechains：Sztorc的替代解決方案

Sztorc champions drivechains, a type of Bitcoin sidechain where BTC is controlled by the miners, as a superior solution. While Gladstein acknowledges the idea's theoretical appeal, he notes that drivechains are currently just that: theoretical. Critics, like Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd, argue that drivechains could negatively impact Bitcoin's base layer.

Sztorc Champions Drivechains是一種比特幣Sidechain，其中BTC由礦工控制，作為卓越的解決方案。儘管格拉德斯坦（Gladstein）承認了這個想法的理論吸引力，但他指出，目前，怪異的是：理論。像比特幣核心貢獻者彼得·托德（Peter Todd）一樣，批評家認為，Drivechains可能會對比特幣的基層產生負面影響。

The Lightning Network: A Central Nervous System?

閃電網絡：中樞神經系統？

Increasingly, the Lightning Network is viewed less as a solution for everyday users and more as a connective infrastructure between different layers within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Gladstein admits that his perspective has evolved, now seeing Lightning as a “central nervous system-type network” connecting end-users, on-chain users, businesses, and exchanges.

越來越多的閃電網絡被視為日常用戶的解決方案，而是比特幣生態系統中不同層之間的結締組織。格拉德斯坦（Gladstein）承認，他的觀點已經發展，現在將閃電視為連接最終用戶，鏈用戶，企業和交流的“中樞神經系統型網絡”。

Federated Models: A Point of Contention

聯合模型：爭論點

Sztorc strongly opposes federated models, arguing that they represent a significant step backward for Bitcoin's fundamental properties. He believes that users essentially relinquish control of their coins with little recourse. While Gladstein is open to better models, he is also excited about technologies like Cashu, which offer enhanced user privacy within the existing framework.

Sztorc強烈反對聯合模型，認為它們代表了比特幣基本屬性的重要一步。他認為，用戶本質上可以放棄對硬幣的控制權，幾乎沒有追索權。儘管Gladstein對更好的模型開放，但他也對Cashu等技術感到興奮，Cashu在現有框架內提供了增強的用戶隱私。

Amazon and Google's Role: Lightning Nodes in the Cloud

亞馬遜和Google的角色：雲中的閃電節點

It's also worth noting that tech giants like Amazon and Google are heavily involved in the Lightning Network. According to data, approximately 45% of Bitcoin's Lightning Network nodes run on Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud. Amazon alone accounts for nearly 30% of all Lightning nodes, leading some to speculate about future Bitcoin payment integration on its e-commerce platform.

還值得注意的是，像亞馬遜和Google這樣的科技巨頭參與了閃電網絡。根據數據，比特幣的Lightning網絡節點的大約45％在Amazon Web Services（AWS）和Google Cloud上運行。僅亞馬遜就佔所有閃電節點的近30％，導致一些人推測其電子商務平台上未來的比特幣支付集成。

The Future is Unwritten

未來是不成文的

The debate surrounding Bitcoin scaling and the Lightning Network is far from over. While Sztorc remains skeptical, others see the Lightning Network as a constantly evolving technology with the potential to transform the future of payments. As adoption continues to grow, only time will tell which approach will ultimately prevail.

圍繞比特幣規模和閃電網絡的辯論還遠遠沒有結束。儘管Sztorc仍然持懷疑態度，但其他人則將閃電網絡視為一種不斷發展的技術，有可能改變付款的未來。隨著收養的不斷增長，只有時間才能說明哪種方法最終會佔上風。

So, is the Lightning Network a giant failure, or is it the future of Bitcoin payments? The jury's still out, but one thing's for sure: the conversation is heating up, and it's definitely worth watching!

那麼，閃電網絡是巨大的故障，還是比特幣支付的未來？陪審團仍在外面，但可以肯定的是：談話正在升溫，絕對值得一看！