闪电网络是“巨大失败”吗？ Paul Sztorc和Alex Gladstein在比特币的扩展解决方案上发生了冲突。参与辩论！

Bitcoin Scaling Showdown: Lightning Network, Sztorc, and the Future of Payments

比特币缩放摊牌：闪电网络，sztorc和付款的未来

The Bitcoin scaling debate rages on! Is the Lightning Network living up to its promise, or is it, as Paul Sztorc claims, a “giant failure”? This blog post dives into the heart of the matter, exploring the key arguments surrounding Bitcoin scaling, the Lightning Network, and the perspectives of figures like Paul Sztorc and Alex Gladstein.

比特币缩放辩论激烈！闪电网络是否符合其诺言，还是正如保罗·斯托克（Paul Sztorc）所说，是“巨大的失败”？这篇博客文章深入介绍了问题的核心，探讨了围绕比特币缩放，闪电网络以及Paul Sztorc和Alex Gladstein等人物的观点的关键论点。

The Great Scaling Debate: A Quick Recap

大规模辩论：快速回顾

Back in the day, from 2015 to 2017 to be exact, the Bitcoin community was locked in a heated debate about how to scale Bitcoin payments to a global audience. Some folks wanted a hard fork to increase on-chain capacity. Others, like the Bitcoin Core contributors, favored maximizing the existing block space. The compromise? Segregated Witness (SegWit), which paved the way for the Lightning Network as a second-layer payment solution.

从2015年到2017年，确切地说，比特币社区陷入了有关如何将比特币支付扩展到全球观众的激烈辩论中。有些人希望一个艰难的叉子来增加链上的能力。其他人，例如比特币核心贡献者，都赞成最大化现有的块空间。妥协？隔离的证人（Segwit），为雷电网络作为第二层支付解决方案铺平了道路。

Sztorc vs. Gladstein: A Clash of Visions

Sztorc vs. Gladstein：一系列异象

Paul Sztorc, drivechain inventor and LayerTwo Labs CEO, hasn't held back on his criticism of the Lightning Network. He sees it as fundamentally flawed and not scalable in the long run. On the other side, Alex Gladstein of the Human Rights Foundation champions the Lightning Network's current utility, pointing to its real-world applications and the value it brings to users today.

Drivechain发明家兼Layertwo Labs首席执行官Paul Sztorc并没有拒绝他对闪电网络的批评。从长远来看，他认为它从根本上是有缺陷的，并且不可扩展。另一方面，人权基金会的亚历克斯·格拉德斯坦（Alex Gladstein）拥护着闪电网络的当前公用事业，指出了其现实世界中的应用程序及其为当今用户带来的价值。

Gladstein's Perspective: Real-World Impact

格拉德斯坦的观点：现实世界的影响

Gladstein highlights the Lightning Network's adoption in areas like Nostr Zaps, integration by major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, and the upcoming integration for Square merchants. He also emphasizes its importance in regions where Bitcoin's lack of KYC/AML restrictions is a lifeline for those who need it most. He argues that the network's usability has drastically improved over the past few years.

格拉德斯坦（Gladstein）强调了闪电网络在NOSTR ZAPS等领域的采用，Binance和Coinbase等主要交易所的集成以及即将进行的Square Merchants集成。他还强调了它在比特币缺乏KYC/AML限制的地区的重要性，对于最需要它的人来说是生命线。他认为，在过去的几年中，网络的可用性已大大提高。

Sztorc's Counterpoint: Long-Term Scalability Concerns

SZTORC的对立面：长期可伸缩性问题

Sztorc dismisses these examples as short-sighted. He argues that the Lightning Network struggles under pressure, citing the increased fees caused by Ordinals Inscriptions as an example. He points out that reverting to the Bitcoin blockchain or opening a low-balance channel becomes uneconomical during high-fee periods.

Sztorc将这些例子视为短视。他认为，闪电网络在压力下挣扎，理由是由序数铭文引起的费用增加。他指出，恢复比特币区块链或打开低体积渠道在高费期间变得不经济。

Drivechains: Sztorc's Alternative Solution

Drivechains：Sztorc的替代解决方案

Sztorc champions drivechains, a type of Bitcoin sidechain where BTC is controlled by the miners, as a superior solution. While Gladstein acknowledges the idea's theoretical appeal, he notes that drivechains are currently just that: theoretical. Critics, like Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd, argue that drivechains could negatively impact Bitcoin's base layer.

Sztorc Champions Drivechains是一种比特币Sidechain，其中BTC由矿工控制，作为卓越的解决方案。尽管格拉德斯坦（Gladstein）承认了这个想法的理论吸引力，但他指出，目前，怪异的是：理论。像比特币核心贡献者彼得·托德（Peter Todd）一样，批评家认为，Drivechains可能会对比特币的基层产生负面影响。

The Lightning Network: A Central Nervous System?

闪电网络：中枢神经系统？

Increasingly, the Lightning Network is viewed less as a solution for everyday users and more as a connective infrastructure between different layers within the Bitcoin ecosystem. Gladstein admits that his perspective has evolved, now seeing Lightning as a “central nervous system-type network” connecting end-users, on-chain users, businesses, and exchanges.

越来越多的闪电网络被视为日常用户的解决方案，而是比特币生态系统中不同层之间的结缔组织。格拉德斯坦（Gladstein）承认，他的观点已经发展，现在将闪电视为连接最终用户，链用户，企业和交流的“中枢神经系统型网络”。

Federated Models: A Point of Contention

联合模型：争论点

Sztorc strongly opposes federated models, arguing that they represent a significant step backward for Bitcoin's fundamental properties. He believes that users essentially relinquish control of their coins with little recourse. While Gladstein is open to better models, he is also excited about technologies like Cashu, which offer enhanced user privacy within the existing framework.

Sztorc强烈反对联合模型，认为它们代表了比特币基本属性的重要一步。他认为，用户本质上可以放弃对硬币的控制权，几乎没有追索权。尽管Gladstein对更好的模型开放，但他也对Cashu等技术感到兴奋，Cashu在现有框架内提供了增强的用户隐私。

Amazon and Google's Role: Lightning Nodes in the Cloud

亚马逊和Google的角色：云中的闪电节点

It's also worth noting that tech giants like Amazon and Google are heavily involved in the Lightning Network. According to data, approximately 45% of Bitcoin's Lightning Network nodes run on Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Cloud. Amazon alone accounts for nearly 30% of all Lightning nodes, leading some to speculate about future Bitcoin payment integration on its e-commerce platform.

还值得注意的是，像亚马逊和Google这样的科技巨头参与了闪电网络。根据数据，比特币的Lightning网络节点的大约45％在Amazon Web Services（AWS）和Google Cloud上运行。仅亚马逊就占所有闪电节点的近30％，导致一些人推测其电子商务平台上未来的比特币支付集成。

The Future is Unwritten

未来是不成文的

The debate surrounding Bitcoin scaling and the Lightning Network is far from over. While Sztorc remains skeptical, others see the Lightning Network as a constantly evolving technology with the potential to transform the future of payments. As adoption continues to grow, only time will tell which approach will ultimately prevail.

围绕比特币规模和闪电网络的辩论还远远没有结束。尽管Sztorc仍然持怀疑态度，但其他人则将闪电网络视为一种不断发展的技术，有可能改变付款的未来。随着收养的不断增长，只有时间才能说明哪种方法最终会占上风。

So, is the Lightning Network a giant failure, or is it the future of Bitcoin payments? The jury's still out, but one thing's for sure: the conversation is heating up, and it's definitely worth watching!

那么，闪电网络是巨大的故障，还是比特币支付的未来？陪审团仍在外面，但可以肯定的是：谈话正在升温，绝对值得一看！