出色的比特幣網絡清理又回來了

有人稱其為數字衛生。其他人則看到偽裝的審查制度。這是這個騷動的核心，一個名字：Grassfedbitcoin。

The great Bitcoin network cleanup is back on the table. Some call it digital hygiene. Others see disguised censorship. And at the heart of this commotion, one name: GrassFedBitcoin. This developer is reigniting an old debate, accusing spammers of choking the protocol. And now the veterans are waking up. Saifedean Ammous, author of "The Bitcoin Standard," says he is ready to financially support a technical crusade against what he considers a deviant use of Bitcoin. Jealous crowd or gatekeepers of the temple?

出色的比特幣網絡清理又回到了桌子上。有人稱其為數字衛生。其他人則看到偽裝的審查制度。這是這個騷動的核心，一個名字：Grassfedbitcoin。該開發人員正在重新點擊舊的辯論，指責垃圾郵件發送者窒息協議。現在，退伍軍人正在醒來。塞菲德（Saifedean Ammous）是《比特幣標準》（Bitcoin Standard）的作者，他說，他準備在財務上支持技術十字軍東征，以反對他認為比特幣的異常使用。嫉妒的人群或寺廟的守門人？

Filters for Bitcoin: A Disruptive Idea

比特幣的過濾器：一個破壞性的想法

GrassFedBitcoin wants to reopen pull request #28408. It would allow Bitcoin nodes to automatically filter the infamous "inscriptions." These data, often images, saturate blocks without real monetary utility. For him, this is a deviation. He states: "No one wants to relay inscriptions. Give them tools for this purpose, make them configurable, and define a default policy that makes bitcoin as a whole more conducive to monetary activity - and not to storing JPGs." He adds that previous increases in the OP_RETURN limit were based on false assumptions. He calls for a modular default policy favoring financial transactions and discouraging image storage. This position, although supported, is not unanimous.

Grassfedbitcoin希望重新打開拉動請求＃28408。它將允許比特幣節點自動過濾臭名昭著的“銘文”。這些數據（通常是圖像）飽和，沒有真正的貨幣實用程序。對他來說，這是一個偏差。他說：“沒有人願意傳達銘文。為此，為它們提供工具，使其可配置，並定義默認策略，使比特幣整體更有利於貨幣活動，而不是存儲JPG。”他補充說，以前的OP_Return限制的增加是基於錯誤的假設。他呼籲制定有利於財務交易並阻止圖像存儲的模塊化違約政策。該職位雖然得到支持，但並不是一致的。

Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, tempers the enthusiasm. For him, it is an "arms race." He explains that spam can always disguise itself as valid code: "The code is infinitely variable" , he says. Therefore, spammers can always bypass filters. But for GrassFedBitcoin, the spam mechanism remains predictable. "If you give me filters, I will use them" , he asserts. His argument: with sufficient adoption, spam decreases due to technical constraints.

Blockstream首席執行官Adam Back的熱情使人們感到震驚。對他來說，這是“軍備競賽”。他解釋說，垃圾郵件總是可以偽裝成有效的代碼：“代碼是無限可變的”，他說。因此，垃圾郵件發送者總是可以繞過過濾器。但是對於草夫甲幣，垃圾郵件機制仍然可以預測。他斷言：“如果你給我過濾器，我會使用它們。”他的論點：通過足夠的採用，由於技術限制，垃圾郵件減少了。

Bitcoin or Bitstore? The Protocol's Identity at Stake

比特幣還是BitStore？協議的身份危險

The question goes beyond technicalities. It touches the very soul of Bitcoin. Is it a store of value or a JPEG file repository? For Ammous, it's clear: action is required. "It’s not easy, but it’s worth trying to ruin spammers faster" , he writes. He insists: filtering is not censorship. "Nodes already reject invalid transactions. So filtering is a usage right, not an attack on freedom."

問題超出了技術性。它觸及了比特幣的靈魂。它是價值存儲還是JPEG文件存儲庫？對於很明顯的是：需要採取行動。他寫道：“這並不容易，但值得更快地毀滅垃圾郵件機。”他堅持認為：過濾不是審查制度。 “節點已經拒絕無效的交易。因此，過濾是一種用法，而不是對自由的攻擊。”

But opposition remains strong. Some talk of authoritarian drift, others defend their freedom to code. More technical voices point out that current spams exploit the signature witness (witness discount), which is supposed to reduce the UTXO base but actually increases it in practice.

但是反對派仍然強大。有些人談論了威權漂移，另一些人捍衛了他們的代碼自由。更多的技術聲音指出，當前的垃圾郵件利用了簽名證人（證人折扣），該證人應該減少UTXO基礎，但實際上在實踐中會增加它。

Here is a summary of the sticking points:

這是粘附點的摘要：

Behind these figures, a war of visions. Some want a clean Bitcoin, focused on money. Others, a space for expression without constraints. Two utopias clash.

在這些數字的背後，一場視覺戰爭。有些人想要一個乾淨的比特幣，專注於金錢。其他，一個無限制的表達空間。兩個烏托邦衝突。

Recently, OP_RETURN has already generated a lot of ink. As proposals harden, it seems the entire Bitcoin structure is ready to shift. More than a debate on spam, this might be a profound identity turning point for the protocol.

最近，OP_Return已經生成了很多墨水。隨著提議硬化，似乎整個比特幣結構都準備好轉移。這不僅僅是關於垃圾郵件的辯論，這可能是該協議的深刻身份轉折點。