出色的比特币网络清理又回来了

有人称其为数字卫生。其他人则看到伪装的审查制度。这是这个骚动的核心，一个名字：Grassfedbitcoin。

The great Bitcoin network cleanup is back on the table. Some call it digital hygiene. Others see disguised censorship. And at the heart of this commotion, one name: GrassFedBitcoin. This developer is reigniting an old debate, accusing spammers of choking the protocol. And now the veterans are waking up. Saifedean Ammous, author of "The Bitcoin Standard," says he is ready to financially support a technical crusade against what he considers a deviant use of Bitcoin. Jealous crowd or gatekeepers of the temple?

出色的比特币网络清理又回到了桌子上。有人称其为数字卫生。其他人则看到伪装的审查制度。这是这个骚动的核心，一个名字：Grassfedbitcoin。该开发人员正在重新点击旧的辩论，指责垃圾邮件发送者窒息协议。现在，退伍军人正在醒来。塞菲德（Saifedean Ammous）是《比特币标准》（Bitcoin Standard）的作者，他说，他准备在财务上支持技术十字军东征，以反对他认为比特币的异常使用。嫉妒的人群或寺庙的守门人？

Filters for Bitcoin: A Disruptive Idea

比特币的过滤器：一个破坏性的想法

GrassFedBitcoin wants to reopen pull request #28408. It would allow Bitcoin nodes to automatically filter the infamous "inscriptions." These data, often images, saturate blocks without real monetary utility. For him, this is a deviation. He states: "No one wants to relay inscriptions. Give them tools for this purpose, make them configurable, and define a default policy that makes bitcoin as a whole more conducive to monetary activity - and not to storing JPGs." He adds that previous increases in the OP_RETURN limit were based on false assumptions. He calls for a modular default policy favoring financial transactions and discouraging image storage. This position, although supported, is not unanimous.

Grassfedbitcoin希望重新打开拉动请求＃28408。它将允许比特币节点自动过滤臭名昭著的“铭文”。这些数据（通常是图像）饱和，没有真正的货币实用程序。对他来说，这是一个偏差。他说：“没有人愿意传达铭文。为此，为它们提供工具，使其可配置，并定义默认策略，使比特币整体更有利于货币活动，而不是存储JPG。”他补充说，以前的OP_Return限制的增加是基于错误的假设。他呼吁制定有利于财务交易并阻止图像存储的模块化违约政策。该职位虽然得到支持，但并不是一致的。

Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, tempers the enthusiasm. For him, it is an "arms race." He explains that spam can always disguise itself as valid code: "The code is infinitely variable" , he says. Therefore, spammers can always bypass filters. But for GrassFedBitcoin, the spam mechanism remains predictable. "If you give me filters, I will use them" , he asserts. His argument: with sufficient adoption, spam decreases due to technical constraints.

Blockstream首席执行官Adam Back的热情使人们感到震惊。对他来说，这是“军备竞赛”。他解释说，垃圾邮件总是可以伪装成有效的代码：“代码是无限可变的”，他说。因此，垃圾邮件发送者总是可以绕过过滤器。但是对于草夫甲币，垃圾邮件机制仍然可以预测。他断言：“如果你给我过滤器，我会使用它们。”他的论点：通过足够的采用，由于技术限制，垃圾邮件减少了。

Bitcoin or Bitstore? The Protocol's Identity at Stake

比特币还是BitStore？协议的身份危险

The question goes beyond technicalities. It touches the very soul of Bitcoin. Is it a store of value or a JPEG file repository? For Ammous, it's clear: action is required. "It’s not easy, but it’s worth trying to ruin spammers faster" , he writes. He insists: filtering is not censorship. "Nodes already reject invalid transactions. So filtering is a usage right, not an attack on freedom."

问题超出了技术性。它触及了比特币的灵魂。它是价值存储还是JPEG文件存储库？对于很明显的是：需要采取行动。他写道：“这并不容易，但值得更快地毁灭垃圾邮件机。”他坚持认为：过滤不是审查制度。 “节点已经拒绝无效的交易。因此，过滤是一种用法，而不是对自由的攻击。”

But opposition remains strong. Some talk of authoritarian drift, others defend their freedom to code. More technical voices point out that current spams exploit the signature witness (witness discount), which is supposed to reduce the UTXO base but actually increases it in practice.

但是反对派仍然强大。有些人谈论了威权漂移，另一些人捍卫了他们的代码自由。更多的技术声音指出，当前的垃圾邮件利用了签名证人（证人折扣），该证人应该减少UTXO基础，但实际上在实践中会增加它。

Here is a summary of the sticking points:

这是粘附点的摘要：

Behind these figures, a war of visions. Some want a clean Bitcoin, focused on money. Others, a space for expression without constraints. Two utopias clash.

在这些数字的背后，一场视觉战争。有些人想要一个干净的比特币，专注于金钱。其他，一个无限制的表达空间。两个乌托邦冲突。

Recently, OP_RETURN has already generated a lot of ink. As proposals harden, it seems the entire Bitcoin structure is ready to shift. More than a debate on spam, this might be a profound identity turning point for the protocol.

最近，OP_Return已经生成了很多墨水。随着提议硬化，似乎整个比特币结构都准备好转移。这不仅仅是关于垃圾邮件的辩论，这可能是该协议的深刻身份转折点。