比特幣核心提案“取消OP_Return數據限制”激發了加熱的討論

最近，Hashkey Investment Research總監@JeffRey_Hu詳細介紹了比特幣Core“取消OP_Return數據限制”提議的背景和爭議。

HashKey Investment Research Director @jeffrey_hu has compiled a summary of the background and controversy surrounding Bitcoin Core developer Peter Todd’s proposal for PR #32359 to “cancel OP_RETURN data restrictions”.

Hashkey Investment Research總監@JeffRey_Hu匯總了圍繞比特幣核心開發商彼得·托德（Peter Todd）提出的PR＃32359提案，以“取消OP_RET_RETURN數據限制”。

For background, OP_RETURN is an opcode in Bitcoin Script that is used to embed small amounts of data in Bitcoin transactions. It allows users to store data on the blockchain, but these outputs are “provably unspendable” and therefore do not add to the burden of the UTXO (unspent transaction output) set.

對於後台，OP_Return是比特幣腳本中的OPODE，用於在比特幣交易中嵌入少量數據。它允許用戶將數據存儲在區塊鏈上，但是這些輸出“可證明是不可投入的”，因此不會增加UTXO（未承擔事務輸出）設置的負擔。

Currently, the default limit of Bitcoin Core is 80 bytes for OP_RETURN data size, and the propagation of OP_RETURN transactions larger than 83 bytes is restricted by node policy (not consensus rules). However, in a recent proposal, developer Peter Todd, known for his contributions to Bitcoin Core and maximalist views, suggests removing this restriction and deleting related configuration options (such as -datacarrier and -datacarriersize) at the same time.

當前，比特幣核心的默認限制為OP_Return數據大小為80個字節，並且大於83個字節的OP_Return Transactions的傳播受節點策略（不是共識規則）的限制。但是，在最近的一項提案中，開發人員彼得·托德（Peter Todd）以其對比特幣核心和最大觀點的貢獻而聞名，這表明刪除了同時刪除這種限制和刪除相關的配置選項（例如-DataCarrier和-dataCarriersize）。

This proposal, PR #32359, has sparked heated discussions among community members. Supporters, such as Nothing Research partner 0x_Todd, highlight the benefits of removing the 80-byte data limit for OP_RETURN.

該提案PR＃32359激發了社區成員之間的激烈討論。支持者，例如Nothing Research Partner 0x_TODD，突出了刪除OP_Return的80字節數據限制的好處。

0x_Todd argues that the current limit is like a "10-cm-high fence" that can be easily bypassed by those who wish to store large data, such as through protocols like Inscriptions and Runes. He also emphasizes that removing the restriction is in line with supporting the ecosystem and miners' interests.

0x_TODD認為，當前限制就像一個“ 10厘米高”，那些希望通過銘文和符文（例如銘文和符文）可以容易繞過的人很容易繞過。他還強調，消除限制與支持生態系統和礦工的利益一致。

However, HashKey Investment Research Director @jeffrey_hu tends to oppose the proposal, seeing it as having more negative effects. He feels that support and opposition are more of a difference in concepts, and there is no absolute right or wrong in the short term.

但是，Hashkey Investment Research總監@Jeffrey_Hu傾向於反對該提案，認為該提案具有更大的負面影響。他認為支持和反對更多地是概念的差異，並且在短期內沒有絕對的對與錯。

In response to 0x_Todd's four arguments, Hu elaborated on his own views. He pointed out that while there were no restrictions on OP_RETURN in the Satoshi Nakamoto era, not all of Satoshi's designs were necessarily reasonable.

為了回應0x_todd的四個論點，胡用自己的觀點闡述了。他指出，雖然在薩托島中部時代對OP_Return沒有任何限制，但並非所有Satoshi的設計都一定是合理的。

Moreover, he highlighted the importance of user freedom and the ability to configure nodes according to personal preferences. With Bitcoin Core removing configuration options and concentrating on its own vision, users who prefer different configurations, such as deploying transaction filters or switching to Bitcoin Knots, would be left with limited choices.

此外，他強調了用戶自由的重要性以及根據個人喜好配置節點的能力。隨著比特幣核心刪除配置選項並專注於自己的願景，更喜歡不同配置的用戶（例如部署事務過濾器或切換到比特幣結）將留下有限的選擇。

As the discussion continues, it remains crucial to consider the broader implications of removing the 80-byte data limit for OP_RETURN and how it aligns with the long-term vision for Bitcoin.

隨著討論的繼續，考慮刪除OP_RETURN的80字節數據限制以及它與比特幣的長期願景的更廣泛含義至關重要。