比特币核心提案“取消OP_Return数据限制”激发了加热的讨论

最近，Hashkey Investment Research总监@JeffRey_Hu详细介绍了比特币Core“取消OP_Return数据限制”提议的背景和争议。

HashKey Investment Research Director @jeffrey_hu has compiled a summary of the background and controversy surrounding Bitcoin Core developer Peter Todd’s proposal for PR #32359 to “cancel OP_RETURN data restrictions”.

Hashkey Investment Research总监@JeffRey_Hu汇总了围绕比特币核心开发商彼得·托德（Peter Todd）提出的PR＃32359提案，以“取消OP_RET_RETURN数据限制”。

For background, OP_RETURN is an opcode in Bitcoin Script that is used to embed small amounts of data in Bitcoin transactions. It allows users to store data on the blockchain, but these outputs are “provably unspendable” and therefore do not add to the burden of the UTXO (unspent transaction output) set.

对于后台，OP_Return是比特币脚本中的OPODE，用于在比特币交易中嵌入少量数据。它允许用户将数据存储在区块链上，但是这些输出“可证明是不可投入的”，因此不会增加UTXO（未承担事务输出）设置的负担。

Currently, the default limit of Bitcoin Core is 80 bytes for OP_RETURN data size, and the propagation of OP_RETURN transactions larger than 83 bytes is restricted by node policy (not consensus rules). However, in a recent proposal, developer Peter Todd, known for his contributions to Bitcoin Core and maximalist views, suggests removing this restriction and deleting related configuration options (such as -datacarrier and -datacarriersize) at the same time.

当前，比特币核心的默认限制为OP_Return数据大小为80个字节，并且大于83个字节的OP_Return Transactions的传播受节点策略（不是共识规则）的限制。但是，在最近的一项提案中，开发人员彼得·托德（Peter Todd）以其对比特币核心和最大观点的贡献而闻名，这表明删除了同时删除这种限制和删除相关的配置选项（例如-DataCarrier和-dataCarriersize）。

This proposal, PR #32359, has sparked heated discussions among community members. Supporters, such as Nothing Research partner 0x_Todd, highlight the benefits of removing the 80-byte data limit for OP_RETURN.

该提案PR＃32359激发了社区成员之间的激烈讨论。支持者，例如Nothing Research Partner 0x_TODD，突出了删除OP_Return的80字节数据限制的好处。

0x_Todd argues that the current limit is like a "10-cm-high fence" that can be easily bypassed by those who wish to store large data, such as through protocols like Inscriptions and Runes. He also emphasizes that removing the restriction is in line with supporting the ecosystem and miners' interests.

0x_TODD认为，当前限制就像一个“ 10厘米高”，那些希望通过铭文和符文（例如铭文和符文）可以容易绕过的人很容易绕过。他还强调，消除限制与支持生态系统和矿工的利益一致。

However, HashKey Investment Research Director @jeffrey_hu tends to oppose the proposal, seeing it as having more negative effects. He feels that support and opposition are more of a difference in concepts, and there is no absolute right or wrong in the short term.

但是，Hashkey Investment Research总监@Jeffrey_Hu倾向于反对该提案，认为该提案具有更大的负面影响。他认为支持和反对更多地是概念的差异，并且在短期内没有绝对的对与错。

In response to 0x_Todd's four arguments, Hu elaborated on his own views. He pointed out that while there were no restrictions on OP_RETURN in the Satoshi Nakamoto era, not all of Satoshi's designs were necessarily reasonable.

为了回应0x_todd的四个论点，胡用自己的观点阐述了。他指出，虽然在萨托岛中部时代对OP_Return没有任何限制，但并非所有Satoshi的设计都一定是合理的。

Moreover, he highlighted the importance of user freedom and the ability to configure nodes according to personal preferences. With Bitcoin Core removing configuration options and concentrating on its own vision, users who prefer different configurations, such as deploying transaction filters or switching to Bitcoin Knots, would be left with limited choices.

此外，他强调了用户自由的重要性以及根据个人喜好配置节点的能力。随着比特币核心删除配置选项并专注于自己的愿景，更喜欢不同配置的用户（例如部署事务过滤器或切换到比特币结）将留下有限的选择。

As the discussion continues, it remains crucial to consider the broader implications of removing the 80-byte data limit for OP_RETURN and how it aligns with the long-term vision for Bitcoin.

随着讨论的继续，考虑删除OP_RETURN的80字节数据限制以及它与比特币的长期愿景的更广泛含义至关重要。