比特幣核心維護者對開發人員的審查演講，而不是op_return提案

本週，數十名開發人員對使用比特幣操作代碼OP_Return放寬交易中數據存儲能力的提案進行了分裂分歧投票。

Maintainers of Bitcoin Core, the primary node software for the cryptocurrency, are flexing a rarely-exercised power to censor speech between developers.

比特幣核心的維護者是加密貨幣的主要節點軟件，它正在為開發人員之間的審查語音發音很少。

This week, dozens of developers voted in split disagreement over a proposal to relax the data storage ability in transactions using a Bitcoin operation code, OP_RETURN.

本週，數十名開發人員對使用比特幣操作代碼OP_Return放寬交易中數據存儲能力的提案進行了分裂分歧投票。

The dispute led a number of prominent developers to decry what they saw as banishment after mods muted senior members with passionate viewpoints.

這場爭端導致許多著名的開發商譴責了在Mods以充滿激情的觀點的Mods靜音高級成員之後，他們認為被放逐。

On one side of the debate, conservatives are arguing for maintaining or even further constricting OP_RETURN’s 83-byte datacarrier limit. On the opposing side, progressives want to relax that threshold, noting plentiful data storage options elsewhere.

在辯論的一方面，保守黨正在爭辯說，甚至進一步限制了OP_Return的83字節DataCarrier限制。在相對方面，進步主義者希望放鬆該閾值，並指出其他地方的數據存儲選項。

As the debate roared, GitHub moderators muted two leading conservatives, Luke Dashjr and Bitcoin Mechanic. The two men argued against easing filters that make the use of Bitcoin’s blockchain easier for storing non-financial data.

當辯論咆哮時，GitHub主持人散發了兩個主要的保守派，Luke Dashjr和比特幣機械師。這兩個人反對放鬆過濾器，使使用比特幣的區塊鏈更容易存儲非財務數據。

They pointed out corporate interests, spam risks, and UTXO validation concerns around lifting OP_RETURN’s data storage ability.

他們指出了涉及OP_Return的數據存儲能力的公司利益，垃圾郵件風險和UTXO驗證問題。

So that's a new one….now Core devs just block people they don't like and we can't comment on any of their PRs any more.cOnSeNsUs!!1 pic.twitter.com/hAqC1R0bXj

所以這是一個新的…。現在，核心開發人員只是阻止他們不喜歡的人，我們再也無法對他們的任何PRS發表評論。

The censorship of their speech incensed a community that values bitcoin’s (BTC) censorship-resistant properties.

他們演講的審查制度激怒了一個重視比特幣（BTC）耐心範圍的社區。

Giacomo Zucco called the moderators “absolutely out-of-control” and “a cabal of self-appointed politicians.” Michelle Weekley called the censorship “antithetical to the ethos of bitcoin.”

賈科莫·佐科（Giacomo Zucco）稱主持人“絕對失控”和“自我任命的政治家”。米歇爾·周刊（Michelle Weekley）稱審查制度“與比特幣的精神相反”。

Another observer considered it “concerted community sabotage.”

另一位觀察者認為這是“一致的社區破壞”。

LMAOBitcoin core devs unlock the PR to only lets pass one ACK then instantly lock again the PR.While a +15 years experienced dev can't comment the PR.Core is attacking Bitcoin! https://t.co/RbWOcXhNf4 pic.twitter.com/KuuQsSm7m

lmaobitcoin core devs解鎖PR只能通過一個ACK，然後立即鎖定PR。 +15年的經驗豐富的Dev無法評論PR.Core正在攻擊比特幣！ https://t.co/rbwocxhnf4 pic.twitter.com/kuuqssm7m

Read more: FixTheFilters: Bitcoin arguments go viral over relaxing Core data storage

閱讀更多：fixthefilters：比特幣參數因放鬆核心數據存儲而流行

Censoring OP_RETURN speech

審查OP_Return演講

Jameson Lopp, leading the other side of the debate, conveniently defended the “moderation” of GitHub that censored the speech of his opponents.

詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）領導著辯論的另一面，便利地捍衛了吉特布（Github）的“節制”，該辯解對他的對手的講話進行了審查。

He blamed his muted interlocutors for ad hominem attacks, praising the censorship as a way to return focus to the technical pull request (PR). He also claimed that the GitHub repository maintainers were only blocking people who never contributed to Bitcoin Core.

他指責他的靜態對話者進行了AD HOMINEM攻擊，稱讚審查制度是將重點歸還到技術拉力請求（PR）的一種方式。他還聲稱，GitHub存儲庫維護者只阻止從未為比特幣核心貢獻的人。

.@LukeDashjr is locked out of the PR. What kind of madness is this? https://t.co/9UwbaG7kh0

。 @lukedashjr被鎖定在公關中。這是什麼樣的瘋狂？ https://t.co/9uwbag7kh0

In reality, moderators muted a username belonging to Bitcoin Mechanic, who has contributed to Core development for years. They also muted various other contributors.

實際上，主持人靜音了一個屬於比特幣機械師的用戶名，他多年來為核心發展做出了貢獻。他們還淡入了其他各種貢獻者。

Rockstar Dev warned, “It seems ban season is in full swing.”

Rockstar Dev警告說：“似乎Ban季節正在如火如荼。”

Samson Mow summarized the state of the OP_RETURN debate that has made #FixTheFilters trend on X. “It’s supposed to be based on rough consensus. Anyone can see that there is no consensus on relaxing OP_RETURN limits.”

Samson Mow總結了OP_Return辯論的狀態，該辯論使#fixthefilters趨勢趨於X。 “應該基於粗糙的共識。

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

有小費嗎？通過Protos洩漏向我們發送電子郵件。有關更多知情的新聞，請關注我們在X，Bluesky和Google News上，或訂閱我們的YouTube頻道。