比特币核心维护者对开发人员的审查演讲，而不是op_return提案

本周，数十名开发人员对使用比特币操作代码OP_Return放宽交易中数据存储能力的提案进行了分裂分歧投票。

Maintainers of Bitcoin Core, the primary node software for the cryptocurrency, are flexing a rarely-exercised power to censor speech between developers.

比特币核心的维护者是加密货币的主要节点软件，它正在为开发人员之间的审查语音发音很少。

This week, dozens of developers voted in split disagreement over a proposal to relax the data storage ability in transactions using a Bitcoin operation code, OP_RETURN.

本周，数十名开发人员对使用比特币操作代码OP_Return放宽交易中数据存储能力的提案进行了分裂分歧投票。

The dispute led a number of prominent developers to decry what they saw as banishment after mods muted senior members with passionate viewpoints.

这场争端导致许多著名的开发商谴责了在Mods以充满激情的观点的Mods静音高级成员之后，他们认为被放逐。

On one side of the debate, conservatives are arguing for maintaining or even further constricting OP_RETURN’s 83-byte datacarrier limit. On the opposing side, progressives want to relax that threshold, noting plentiful data storage options elsewhere.

在辩论的一方面，保守党正在争辩说，甚至进一步限制了OP_Return的83字节DataCarrier限制。在相对方面，进步主义者希望放松该阈值，并指出其他地方的数据存储选项。

As the debate roared, GitHub moderators muted two leading conservatives, Luke Dashjr and Bitcoin Mechanic. The two men argued against easing filters that make the use of Bitcoin’s blockchain easier for storing non-financial data.

当辩论咆哮时，GitHub主持人散发了两个主要的保守派，Luke Dashjr和比特币机械师。这两个人反对放松过滤器，使使用比特币的区块链更容易存储非财务数据。

They pointed out corporate interests, spam risks, and UTXO validation concerns around lifting OP_RETURN’s data storage ability.

他们指出了涉及OP_Return的数据存储能力的公司利益，垃圾邮件风险和UTXO验证问题。

So that's a new one….now Core devs just block people they don't like and we can't comment on any of their PRs any more.cOnSeNsUs!!1 pic.twitter.com/hAqC1R0bXj

所以这是一个新的…。现在，核心开发人员只是阻止他们不喜欢的人，我们再也无法对他们的任何PRS发表评论。

The censorship of their speech incensed a community that values bitcoin’s (BTC) censorship-resistant properties.

他们演讲的审查制度激怒了一个重视比特币（BTC）耐心范围的社区。

Giacomo Zucco called the moderators “absolutely out-of-control” and “a cabal of self-appointed politicians.” Michelle Weekley called the censorship “antithetical to the ethos of bitcoin.”

贾科莫·佐科（Giacomo Zucco）称主持人“绝对失控”和“自我任命的政治家”。米歇尔·周刊（Michelle Weekley）称审查制度“与比特币的精神相反”。

Another observer considered it “concerted community sabotage.”

另一位观察者认为这是“一致的社区破坏”。

LMAOBitcoin core devs unlock the PR to only lets pass one ACK then instantly lock again the PR.While a +15 years experienced dev can't comment the PR.Core is attacking Bitcoin! https://t.co/RbWOcXhNf4 pic.twitter.com/KuuQsSm7m

lmaobitcoin core devs解锁PR只能通过一个ACK，然后立即锁定PR。+15年的经验丰富的Dev无法评论PR.Core正在攻击比特币！ https://t.co/rbwocxhnf4 pic.twitter.com/kuuqssm7m

Read more: FixTheFilters: Bitcoin arguments go viral over relaxing Core data storage

阅读更多：fixthefilters：比特币参数因放松核心数据存储而流行

Censoring OP_RETURN speech

审查OP_Return演讲

Jameson Lopp, leading the other side of the debate, conveniently defended the “moderation” of GitHub that censored the speech of his opponents.

詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）领导着辩论的另一面，便利地捍卫了吉特布（Github）的“节制”，该辩解对他的对手的讲话进行了审查。

He blamed his muted interlocutors for ad hominem attacks, praising the censorship as a way to return focus to the technical pull request (PR). He also claimed that the GitHub repository maintainers were only blocking people who never contributed to Bitcoin Core.

他指责他的静态对话者进行了AD HOMINEM攻击，称赞审查制度是将重点归还到技术拉力请求（PR）的一种方式。他还声称，GitHub存储库维护者只阻止从未为比特币核心贡献的人。

.@LukeDashjr is locked out of the PR. What kind of madness is this? https://t.co/9UwbaG7kh0

。@lukedashjr被锁定在公关中。这是什么样的疯狂？ https://t.co/9uwbag7kh0

In reality, moderators muted a username belonging to Bitcoin Mechanic, who has contributed to Core development for years. They also muted various other contributors.

实际上，主持人静音了一个属于比特币机械师的用户名，他多年来为核心发展做出了贡献。他们还淡入了其他各种贡献者。

Rockstar Dev warned, “It seems ban season is in full swing.”

Rockstar Dev警告说：“似乎Ban季节正在如火如荼。”

Samson Mow summarized the state of the OP_RETURN debate that has made #FixTheFilters trend on X. “It’s supposed to be based on rough consensus. Anyone can see that there is no consensus on relaxing OP_RETURN limits.”

Samson Mow总结了OP_Return辩论的状态，该辩论使#fixthefilters趋势趋于X。“应该基于粗糙的共识。

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

有小费吗？通过Protos泄漏向我们发送电子邮件。有关更多知情的新闻，请关注我们在X，Bluesky和Google News上，或订阅我们的YouTube频道。