Binance Smart Chain（BSC）的汽油費可以減少3至10次

Binance創始人Changpeng Zhao（更名為CZ）有一個計劃，可以大大降低Binance Smart Chain（BSC）的汽油費用。

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, better known as CZ, has a plan that could drastically reduce gas fees on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). In a statement on X earlier this week, CZ floated cutting fees by as much as three to ten times, a bid to make the network more competitive.

Binance創始人Changpeng Zhao（更名為CZ）有一個計劃，可以大大降低Binance Smart Chain（BSC）的汽油費用。在本週早些時候在X上的一份聲明中，CZ將削減費用高達三到十次，這是使網絡更具競爭力的出價。

This comes at a time when BSC is facing increasing pressure from other blockchain networks. The cost efficient transactions by platforms such as Solana have inspired Binance to consider how it can restructure its fee model. CZ’s idea is to make BSC more attractive to users and developers.

這是在BSC面臨著其他區塊鍊網絡的壓力增加的時候。諸如Solana之類的平台的經濟高效交易啟發了Binance，以考慮如何重組其費用模型。 CZ的想法是使BSC對用戶和開發人員更具吸引力。

“Let’s lower the BSC gas fee. three times or ten times?” CZ asked on X at 6:53 UTC on May 7, 2025. The crypto community was quick to react to this question, as it illustrates how important the possible change could be. Lowering the fees could increase the transaction volume and entice more projects to the BSC ecosystem.

“讓我們降低BSC汽油費。三次還是十次？” CZ在2025年5月7日在UTC上的X上詢問。加密社區很快就對這個問題做出了反應，這說明了可能的變化的重要性。降低費用可能會增加交易量，並吸引更多項目進入BSC生態系統。

This installment of TechNode Global's biweekly series on legal developments in China's blockchain and cryptocurrency scene focuses on a pair of cases that highlight the legal issues arising from the intersection of blockchain technology and traditional financial products.

這本技術的全球每兩週一系列關於中國區塊鍊和加密貨幣現場的法律發展系列的重點是一對案件，突出了區塊鏈技術與傳統金融產品的交匯處引起的法律問題。

In April 2023, a judge in the Intermediate People's Court of Ningbo City ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Chainalysis, in a case against a defendant identified only as "Wang," who was ordered to pay 1.88 Bitcoin (BTC) in compensation plus legal fees. The case involved a fraudulent investment scheme using Bitcoin.

2023年4月，寧波市中級人民法院的一名法官裁定有利於原告，鏈分析的法官，在針對僅確定為“王”的被告的案件中，他被命令支付1.88比特幣（BTC）以賠償和法律費用支付。該案涉及使用比特幣的欺詐投資計劃。

The court's decision in Chainalysis's favor is noteworthy because it recognized the legal status of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in China, despite the government's ban on cryptocurrency trading and fundraising.

值得注意的是，法院對Chainalysis的裁決值得注意，因為它承認了中國比特幣和其他加密貨幣的法律地位，儘管政府禁止加密貨幣交易和籌款。

The defendant, Wang, had invited the plaintiff, a cryptocurrency analysis firm, to invest in a project that purportedly involved arbitrage opportunities on the Huobi exchange. However, after the plaintiff invested 1.88 Bitcoin, the defendant ceased all communication.

被告王邀請了一家加密貨幣分析公司原告投資一個據稱涉及Huobi Exchange套利機會的項目。但是，在原告投資1.88比特幣之後，被告停止了所有溝通。

The plaintiff sued the defendant for fraudulent misappropriation of cryptocurrency assets. During the trial, the defendant claimed that the parties' communication was through the use of a VPN and that the transactions were conducted in Bitcoin, which is not a legal tender currency in China. He argued that the court should not have jurisdiction over this "cross-border" matter.

原告起訴被告欺詐性盜用加密貨幣資產。在審判期間，被告聲稱當事方的溝通是通過使用VPN，並且交易是用比特幣進行的，比特幣不是中國的合法貨幣。他辯稱，法院不應對這一“跨境”事務具有管轄權。

However, the court ruled that although the parties used a VPN for communication and the transactions were in Bitcoin, they met in China to discuss the investment project, and the defendant's actions clearly fell within the scope of fraudulent misappropriation of assets as defined by the Chinese Criminal Code.

但是，法院裁定，儘管當事方使用VPN進行通信，交易是在比特幣中，但他們在中國開會以討論投資項目，被告的行動顯然屬於中國刑法所定義的欺詐性盜用資產的範圍。

The court also recognized that cryptocurrency assets have exchange value and economic value, and they are protected by law. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of Chainalysis, ordering the defendant to pay the misappropriated cryptocurrency assets and legal fees.

法院還認識到，加密貨幣資產具有兌換價值和經濟價值，並且受法律保護。最終，法院裁定支持鏈分析，下令被告支付盜用的加密貨幣資產和法律費用。

In another case decided in March 2023 by the Intermediate People's Court of Beijing, a lender was ordered to return digital currency to a borrower. This case involved a loan agreement between a lender surnamed Shi and a borrower surnamed Li.

在另一個案件中，北京中級人民法院於2023年3月決定，貸款人被勒令將數字貨幣歸還給借款人。該案件涉及姓什（Shi）的貸方與借用李的借款人之間的貸款協議。

After the parties signed a loan agreement, the borrower transferred 0.5 Bitcoin to the lender's digital currency wallet. However, the lender later claimed that the borrower had not repaid the loan principal and interest in full.

雙方簽署貸款協議後，借款人將0.5比特幣轉移到了貸方的數字貨幣錢包中。但是，貸方後來聲稱借款人沒有全額償還貸款本金和利息。

The borrower sued the lender in December 2022, demanding the return of the digital currency. During the trial, the lender argued that the loan period had expired and the borrower should have repaid the loan principal and interest in full.

借款人於2022年12月起訴貸方，要求返回數字貨幣。在審判期間，貸方辯稱，貸款期限已過期，借款人應償還貸款本金和全額利息。

The court's analysis focused on the parties' intentions and the purpose of the transactions. Although the parties did not specify the type of digital currency in their lawsuit, the court recognized that digital currency is a form of valuable asset.

法院的分析集中在各方的意圖和交易的目的上。儘管各方沒有在訴訟中指定數字貨幣的類型，但法院承認數字貨幣是有價值的資產形式。

Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the borrower, ordering the lender to return the digital currency to the borrower's digital currency wallet within ten days of the verdict.

最終，法院裁定有利於借款人，命令貸方在判決後的十天內將數字貨幣歸還借款人的數字貨幣錢包。

These two cases highlight the legal issues arising from the intersection of blockchain technology and traditional financial products. The courts in China are increasingly being called upon to resolve disputes involving cryptocurrency assets and other blockchain-related matters.

這兩個案例突出了區塊鏈技術與傳統金融產品的交集引起的法律問題。越來越多地要求中國法院解決涉及加密貨幣資產和其他與區塊鏈有關的問題的爭議。

As China continues to develop its legal framework for the digital economy, it will be interesting to see how the courts balance the government's policy objectives with the need to protect the rights and interests of litigants in this emerging domain.

隨著中國繼續為數字經濟發展其法律框架，有趣的是，法院如何平衡政府的政策目標與保護該新興領域中訴訟人的權利和利益的需要。

This installment of TechNode Global's biweekly series on legal developments in China's blockchain and cryptocurrency scene explores recent cases showcasing the legal issues arising from the intersection of blockchain technology and traditional financial products.

這本Technode Global在中國區塊鍊和加密貨幣場景中進行的關於法律發展的每兩週一系列的系列探討了最近的案例，展示了區塊鏈技術與傳統金融產品的交匯處引起的法律問題。

In April 2023, a judge at the Intermediate People's Court of Ningbo City ruled in favor of plaintiff Chainalysis in a case against defendant Wang, ordering the defendant to pay 1.88 Bitcoin in compensation plus legal fees. The case involved a fraudulent investment scheme using Bitcoin.

2023年4月，寧波市中級人民法院的一名法官在針對被告王的案件中裁定了原告鏈分析，命令被告支付1.88比特幣的賠償和法律費用。該案涉及使用比特幣的欺詐投資計劃。

The defendant, Wang, had invited the plaintiff, a

被告王邀請了原告