Binance Smart Chain（BSC）的汽油费可以减少3至10次

Binance创始人Changpeng Zhao（更名为CZ）有一个计划，可以大大降低Binance Smart Chain（BSC）的汽油费用。

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, better known as CZ, has a plan that could drastically reduce gas fees on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). In a statement on X earlier this week, CZ floated cutting fees by as much as three to ten times, a bid to make the network more competitive.

Binance创始人Changpeng Zhao（更名为CZ）有一个计划，可以大大降低Binance Smart Chain（BSC）的汽油费用。在本周早些时候在X上的一份声明中，CZ将削减费用高达三到十次，这是使网络更具竞争力的出价。

This comes at a time when BSC is facing increasing pressure from other blockchain networks. The cost efficient transactions by platforms such as Solana have inspired Binance to consider how it can restructure its fee model. CZ’s idea is to make BSC more attractive to users and developers.

这是在BSC面临着其他区块链网络的压力增加的时候。诸如Solana之类的平台的经济高效交易启发了Binance，以考虑如何重组其费用模型。 CZ的想法是使BSC对用户和开发人员更具吸引力。

“Let’s lower the BSC gas fee. three times or ten times?” CZ asked on X at 6:53 UTC on May 7, 2025. The crypto community was quick to react to this question, as it illustrates how important the possible change could be. Lowering the fees could increase the transaction volume and entice more projects to the BSC ecosystem.

“让我们降低BSC汽油费。三次还是十次？” CZ在2025年5月7日在UTC上的X上询问。加密社区很快就对这个问题做出了反应，这说明了可能的变化的重要性。降低费用可能会增加交易量，并吸引更多项目进入BSC生态系统。

This installment of TechNode Global's biweekly series on legal developments in China's blockchain and cryptocurrency scene focuses on a pair of cases that highlight the legal issues arising from the intersection of blockchain technology and traditional financial products.

这本技术的全球每两周一系列关于中国区块链和加密货币现场的法律发展系列的重点是一对案件，突出了区块链技术与传统金融产品的交汇处引起的法律问题。

In April 2023, a judge in the Intermediate People's Court of Ningbo City ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Chainalysis, in a case against a defendant identified only as "Wang," who was ordered to pay 1.88 Bitcoin (BTC) in compensation plus legal fees. The case involved a fraudulent investment scheme using Bitcoin.

2023年4月，宁波市中级人民法院的一名法官裁定有利于原告，链分析的法官，在针对仅确定为“王”的被告的案件中，他被命令支付1.88比特币（BTC）以赔偿和法律费用支付。该案涉及使用比特币的欺诈投资计划。

The court's decision in Chainalysis's favor is noteworthy because it recognized the legal status of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in China, despite the government's ban on cryptocurrency trading and fundraising.

值得注意的是，法院对Chainalysis的裁决值得注意，因为它承认了中国比特币和其他加密货币的法律地位，尽管政府禁止加密货币交易和筹款。

The defendant, Wang, had invited the plaintiff, a cryptocurrency analysis firm, to invest in a project that purportedly involved arbitrage opportunities on the Huobi exchange. However, after the plaintiff invested 1.88 Bitcoin, the defendant ceased all communication.

被告王邀请了一家加密货币分析公司原告投资一个据称涉及Huobi Exchange套利机会的项目。但是，在原告投资1.88比特币之后，被告停止了所有沟通。

The plaintiff sued the defendant for fraudulent misappropriation of cryptocurrency assets. During the trial, the defendant claimed that the parties' communication was through the use of a VPN and that the transactions were conducted in Bitcoin, which is not a legal tender currency in China. He argued that the court should not have jurisdiction over this "cross-border" matter.

原告起诉被告欺诈性盗用加密货币资产。在审判期间，被告声称当事方的沟通是通过使用VPN，并且交易是用比特币进行的，比特币不是中国的合法货币。他辩称，法院不应对这一“跨境”事务具有管辖权。

However, the court ruled that although the parties used a VPN for communication and the transactions were in Bitcoin, they met in China to discuss the investment project, and the defendant's actions clearly fell within the scope of fraudulent misappropriation of assets as defined by the Chinese Criminal Code.

但是，法院裁定，尽管当事方使用VPN进行通信，交易是在比特币中，但他们在中国开会以讨论投资项目，被告的行动显然属于中国刑法所定义的欺诈性盗用资产的范围。

The court also recognized that cryptocurrency assets have exchange value and economic value, and they are protected by law. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of Chainalysis, ordering the defendant to pay the misappropriated cryptocurrency assets and legal fees.

法院还认识到，加密货币资产具有兑换价值和经济价值，并且受法律保护。最终，法院裁定支持链分析，下令被告支付盗用的加密货币资产和法律费用。

In another case decided in March 2023 by the Intermediate People's Court of Beijing, a lender was ordered to return digital currency to a borrower. This case involved a loan agreement between a lender surnamed Shi and a borrower surnamed Li.

在另一个案件中，北京中级人民法院于2023年3月决定，贷款人被勒令将数字货币归还给借款人。该案件涉及姓什（Shi）的贷方与借用李的借款人之间的贷款协议。

After the parties signed a loan agreement, the borrower transferred 0.5 Bitcoin to the lender's digital currency wallet. However, the lender later claimed that the borrower had not repaid the loan principal and interest in full.

双方签署贷款协议后，借款人将0.5比特币转移到了贷方的数字货币钱包中。但是，贷方后来声称借款人没有全额偿还贷款本金和利息。

The borrower sued the lender in December 2022, demanding the return of the digital currency. During the trial, the lender argued that the loan period had expired and the borrower should have repaid the loan principal and interest in full.

借款人于2022年12月起诉贷方，要求返回数字货币。在审判期间，贷方辩称，贷款期限已过期，借款人应偿还贷款本金和全额利息。

The court's analysis focused on the parties' intentions and the purpose of the transactions. Although the parties did not specify the type of digital currency in their lawsuit, the court recognized that digital currency is a form of valuable asset.

法院的分析集中在各方的意图和交易的目的上。尽管各方没有在诉讼中指定数字货币的类型，但法院承认数字货币是有价值的资产形式。

Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the borrower, ordering the lender to return the digital currency to the borrower's digital currency wallet within ten days of the verdict.

最终，法院裁定有利于借款人，命令贷方在判决后的十天内将数字货币归还借款人的数字货币钱包。

These two cases highlight the legal issues arising from the intersection of blockchain technology and traditional financial products. The courts in China are increasingly being called upon to resolve disputes involving cryptocurrency assets and other blockchain-related matters.

这两个案例突出了区块链技术与传统金融产品的交集引起的法律问题。越来越多地要求中国法院解决涉及加密货币资产和其他与区块链有关的问题的争议。

As China continues to develop its legal framework for the digital economy, it will be interesting to see how the courts balance the government's policy objectives with the need to protect the rights and interests of litigants in this emerging domain.

随着中国继续为数字经济发展其法律框架，有趣的是，法院如何平衡政府的政策目标与保护该新兴领域中诉讼人的权利和利益的需要。

This installment of TechNode Global's biweekly series on legal developments in China's blockchain and cryptocurrency scene explores recent cases showcasing the legal issues arising from the intersection of blockchain technology and traditional financial products.

这本Technode Global在中国区块链和加密货币场景中进行的关于法律发展的每两周一系列的系列探讨了最近的案例，展示了区块链技术与传统金融产品的交汇处引起的法律问题。

In April 2023, a judge at the Intermediate People's Court of Ningbo City ruled in favor of plaintiff Chainalysis in a case against defendant Wang, ordering the defendant to pay 1.88 Bitcoin in compensation plus legal fees. The case involved a fraudulent investment scheme using Bitcoin.

2023年4月，宁波市中级人民法院的一名法官在针对被告王的案件中裁定了原告链分析，命令被告支付1.88比特币的赔偿和法律费用。该案涉及使用比特币的欺诈投资计划。

The defendant, Wang, had invited the plaintiff, a

被告王邀请了原告