What is the difference between PPS and PPLNS pools?

PPS offers stable payouts per share, while PPLNS rewards miners based on recent contributions, favoring long-term loyalty over short-term gains.

Jul 15, 2025 at 06:15 pm

Understanding Mining Pool Reward Systems

In the world of cryptocurrency mining, miners often join forces to increase their chances of successfully mining a block. To distribute rewards fairly among participants, mining pools use different payment systems. Two of the most popular reward methods are PPS (Pay Per Share) and PPLNS (Pay Per Last N Shares). These models differ significantly in how they calculate and distribute earnings to miners.

What is PPS?

PPS, or Pay Per Share, is a straightforward payment model where miners are compensated for each valid share they submit to the pool. A "share" is essentially proof that a miner has contributed computational work toward solving a block. In this system, the pool operator bears the risk of variance because they guarantee a fixed payout per share regardless of whether the pool finds a block or not.

• Miners receive immediate rewards for every share submitted.
• The payout is calculated based on the difficulty of the share and the current block reward.
• Pool operators deduct a fee from the total payout before distributing it to miners.

This model provides predictable income for miners, which makes it especially appealing for those who prefer stable returns.

How Does PPLNS Work?

PPLNS, or Pay Per Last N Shares, operates differently. Instead of paying for every share submitted, this model evaluates the number of valid shares submitted during a specific time window — typically measured as the last "N" shares before a block is found. Only the miners who contributed within this window receive a portion of the reward.

• When a block is successfully mined, the pool looks back at the last "N" shares submitted by all miners.
• Each miner's contribution is proportionally rewarded based on how many of those shares they submitted.
• This method encourages long-term commitment and discourages "pool hopping" — a practice where miners switch pools frequently to exploit short-term gains.

Because payouts depend on actual block discoveries, miners may experience more fluctuation in their earnings compared to PPS.

Key Differences Between PPS and PPLNS

One of the main differences between these two systems lies in risk distribution. In PPS, the pool operator assumes most of the risk by offering guaranteed payments. In contrast, PPLNS distributes the risk among miners, making earnings more variable but potentially more profitable when the pool performs well.

Another important distinction is payout consistency. With PPS, miners get paid immediately for each valid share, resulting in steady income. On the other hand, PPLNS only pays out after a block is found, which can lead to irregular payments depending on the pool’s luck and hash rate.

The fee structure also varies. While PPS usually includes a higher service fee due to the guaranteed payout model, PPLNS tends to have lower fees since the pool doesn’t bear as much financial risk.

Lastly, mining behavior incentives differ. PPS does not penalize miners for switching pools, while PPLNS rewards consistent participation and deters frequent switching.

Which One Is Better for Miners?

Choosing between PPS and PPLNS depends largely on a miner’s preference for income stability versus potential profitability. If a miner values predictable and regular payouts, PPS might be the better option. It suits individuals who want to avoid the volatility associated with mining luck.

Conversely, if a miner is comfortable with variable income and believes the pool has a strong performance history, PPLNS could yield higher long-term earnings. This model benefits miners who stay with the pool over extended periods, especially during successful streaks.

Miners should also consider the reputation and reliability of the pool operator. Since PPS requires the operator to front payments, there's a greater chance of financial instability or even fraud if the pool isn't well-managed. In contrast, PPLNS is generally considered safer for pool operators, reducing the likelihood of sudden shutdowns due to insolvency.

Technical Aspects of PPS and PPLNS

From a technical standpoint, both systems require accurate tracking of shares and efficient calculation mechanisms. In PPS, the pool must estimate the value of each share based on network difficulty and expected block rewards. It uses a formula like:

Payout = (Share Difficulty / Block Difficulty)  Block Reward  (1 - Pool Fee)

For PPLNS, the calculation involves analyzing the last "N" shares before a block is found and determining each miner’s proportional contribution. The formula used is:

Payout = (Miner's Shares in Window / Total Shares in Window)  Block Reward  (1 - Pool Fee)

Both systems rely on robust backend infrastructure to ensure transparency and fairness. Many modern mining pools offer real-time dashboards where miners can monitor their contributions and earnings.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I switch between PPS and PPLNS in the same mining pool?

A: Some pools allow users to choose their preferred reward system, while others operate exclusively under one model. Always check the pool’s settings or documentation before joining.

Q: Does PPLNS favor large miners over small ones?

A: No, PPLNS treats all miners equally based on their proportional contribution during the defined window. However, larger miners may benefit more from favorable variance over time.

Q: Why do some pools combine PPS with other models?

A: Hybrid models like PPLNS + PPS aim to balance risk and reward between miners and pool operators. These combinations provide partial guarantees while maintaining long-term fairness.

Q: How does network difficulty affect PPS and PPLNS payouts?

A: Higher network difficulty increases the computational effort required to mine a block, which reduces the value of each share in both models. Miners must adjust their expectations accordingly.