XRP经历了最大的复出之一

最近，比特币（BTC）最大主义者皮埃尔·罗查德（Pierre Rochard）批评XRP引发了辩论。在X上的一篇文章中，他批评了令牌显然是如何用薄空制成的，这表明波纹可以在一时兴起膨胀其供应。

XRP has experienced one of the biggest comebacks in the post-2024 US election bull cycle. The token climbed from below $1 to over $3 in its latest peak, nearly breaking its all-time high seven years ago.

XRP经历了2024年后美国选举牛周期中最大的卷土重来之一。代币在其最新高峰中从1美元以下攀升至3美元以上，几乎打破了七年前历史最高的高潮。

However, it also painted a giant target sign on the digital asset as many have questioned its relevance and economy.

但是，由于许多人质疑其相关性和经济性，因此它还在数字资产上绘制了一个巨大的目标标志。

Recently, Bitcoin (BTC) maximalist Pierre Rochard triggered a debate with his criticism of XRP. In a post on X, he criticized how the token is apparently made from thin air.

最近，比特币（BTC）最大主义者皮埃尔·罗查德（Pierre Rochard）批评XRP引发了辩论。在X上的一篇文章中，他批评了令牌显然是如何用薄空制成的。

The former Vice President of Research at Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIOT) also said that XRP is nothing but a mechanism to sustain Ripple’s operating cash inflow.

Riot Platforms（NASDAQ：RIOT）的前研究副总裁还说，XRP不过是维持Ripple的运营现金流入的机制。

In other words, holders are not really investing in the token. Instead, they are only fueling the company’s blatant cash grab. On the other hand, Ripple doesn’t owe XRP holders anything post-sale.

换句话说，持有人并没有真正投资于代币。取而代之的是，他们只是为公司的公然现金抢购加油。另一方面，Ripple并不欠XRP持有人。

Rochard’s statement is a follow-up to his previous post saying that XRP is not a security because Ripple does not owe its holders utility or any obligation.

罗查德（Rochard）的声明是他上一篇文章的后续言论，称XRP不是安全性，因为波纹不欠其持有人公用事业或任何义务。

Hence, the business could just dump its supply anytime it wants to, and XRP holders couldn’t do anything but join them in dumping the token.

因此，业务可以随时随地丢弃其供应，而XRP持有人无能为力，只能加入他们倾倒令牌。

"It's not a security because they don't owe you anything. They can sell their coins and you'll follow in a chain reaction. They can make as many coins as they want and no one can stop them," he added.

他补充说：“这不是一个安全性，因为他们不欠您任何东西。他们可以出售硬币，您会遵循连锁反应。他们可以制作自己想要的尽可能多的硬币，没有人可以阻止他们。”

In response, Chief Technology Officer of Ripple David Schwartz confirmed that the company acts on its own and shareholders’ interests. XRP holders shouldn’t rely on or expect it to decide in a way that’s detrimental to its goals and his investor’s financial welfare.

作为回应，Ripple David Schwartz的首席技术官确认该公司自行采取行动和股东的利益。 XRP持有人不应依靠或期望它以有害目标和投资者的财务福利的方式做出决定。

However, the Ripple official refuted the former Riot VP’s claim that Ripple can inflate XRP’s supply anytime it wants to via its influence on the consensus of the XRP Ledger (XRPL).

但是，波纹官员驳斥了前Riot副总裁的说法，即波纹可以随时通过其对XRP Ledger（XRPL）共识的影响而膨胀XRP的供应。

Schwartz clarified that no network rule in the XRPL code would allow the activity. The Ripple CTO explained that the network rules enforced by the nodes of XRPL particularly prohibit the event from happening while calling the former Riot official’s contentions nonsense.

Schwartz澄清说，XRPL代码中没有网络规则将允许活动。 Ripple CTO解释说，XRPL节点执行的网络规则特别禁止事件发生，同时称这位前Riot官员的争论废话。

In addition, Schwartz pointed out that unlimited token creation is impossible in XRPL because of its sophisticated invariant checking system. The same function prevents even software bugs from minting new tokens, similar to what happened during Bitcoin’s value overflow incident in August 2010 and the DAO hack in June 2016.

此外，Schwartz指出，由于其复杂的不变检查系统，XRPL不可能在XRPL中创建无限的令牌。相同的功能甚至可以防止软件错误铸造新的代币，这类似于2010年8月比特币价值溢出事件和2016年6月的DAO黑客术中发生的事情。

Along the way, a Ripple developer operating under the alias “Vet” on X also reinforced Schwartz’s arguments.

一路上，在X上的别名“兽医”下运行的连锁开发人员也加强了施瓦茨的论点。

This was perfectly demonstrated during XRPL’s outage last month, wherein its system eventually self-repaired, and no assets were reportedly lost during the event.

这是在XRPL上个月停电期间完美证明的，该系统最终自我修复，据报道在活动期间没有资产损失。

Moreover, Hamilton highlighted the fact that due to XRPL’s invariant checks, there was never an incident in XRP history that resulted in the manipulation of its supply, like the infamous Bitcoin incident more than a decade ago.

此外，汉密尔顿强调了一个事实，即由于XRPL的不变检查，XRP历史上从未发生过事件导致其供应的操纵，例如十多年前臭名昭著的比特币事件。