XRP經歷了最大的複出之一

最近，比特幣（BTC）最大主義者皮埃爾·羅查德（Pierre Rochard）批評XRP引發了辯論。在X上的一篇文章中，他批評了令牌顯然是如何用薄空製成的，這表明波紋可以在一時興起膨脹其供應。

XRP has experienced one of the biggest comebacks in the post-2024 US election bull cycle. The token climbed from below $1 to over $3 in its latest peak, nearly breaking its all-time high seven years ago.

XRP經歷了2024年後美國選舉牛週期中最大的捲土重來之一。代幣在其最新高峰中從1美元以下攀升至3美元以上，幾乎打破了七年前歷史最高的高潮。

However, it also painted a giant target sign on the digital asset as many have questioned its relevance and economy.

但是，由於許多人質疑其相關性和經濟性，因此它還在數字資產上繪製了一個巨大的目標標誌。

Recently, Bitcoin (BTC) maximalist Pierre Rochard triggered a debate with his criticism of XRP. In a post on X, he criticized how the token is apparently made from thin air.

最近，比特幣（BTC）最大主義者皮埃爾·羅查德（Pierre Rochard）批評XRP引發了辯論。在X上的一篇文章中，他批評了令牌顯然是如何用薄空製成的。

The former Vice President of Research at Riot Platforms (NASDAQ:RIOT) also said that XRP is nothing but a mechanism to sustain Ripple’s operating cash inflow.

Riot Platforms（NASDAQ：RIOT）的前研究副總裁還說，XRP不過是維持Ripple的運營現金流入的機制。

In other words, holders are not really investing in the token. Instead, they are only fueling the company’s blatant cash grab. On the other hand, Ripple doesn’t owe XRP holders anything post-sale.

換句話說，持有人並沒有真正投資於代幣。取而代之的是，他們只是為公司的公然現金搶購加油。另一方面，Ripple並不欠XRP持有人。

Rochard’s statement is a follow-up to his previous post saying that XRP is not a security because Ripple does not owe its holders utility or any obligation.

羅查德（Rochard）的聲明是他上一篇文章的後續言論，稱XRP不是安全性，因為波紋不欠其持有人公用事業或任何義務。

Hence, the business could just dump its supply anytime it wants to, and XRP holders couldn’t do anything but join them in dumping the token.

因此，業務可以隨時隨地丟棄其供應，而XRP持有人無能為力，只能加入他們傾倒令牌。

"It's not a security because they don't owe you anything. They can sell their coins and you'll follow in a chain reaction. They can make as many coins as they want and no one can stop them," he added.

他補充說：“這不是一個安全性，因為他們不欠您任何東西。他們可以出售硬幣，您會遵循連鎖反應。他們可以製作自己想要的盡可能多的硬幣，沒有人可以阻止他們。”

In response, Chief Technology Officer of Ripple David Schwartz confirmed that the company acts on its own and shareholders’ interests. XRP holders shouldn’t rely on or expect it to decide in a way that’s detrimental to its goals and his investor’s financial welfare.

作為回應，Ripple David Schwartz的首席技術官確認該公司自行採取行動和股東的利益。 XRP持有人不應依靠或期望它以有害目標和投資者的財務福利的方式做出決定。

However, the Ripple official refuted the former Riot VP’s claim that Ripple can inflate XRP’s supply anytime it wants to via its influence on the consensus of the XRP Ledger (XRPL).

但是，波紋官員駁斥了前Riot副總裁的說法，即波紋可以隨時通過其對XRP Ledger（XRPL）共識的影響而膨脹XRP的供應。

Schwartz clarified that no network rule in the XRPL code would allow the activity. The Ripple CTO explained that the network rules enforced by the nodes of XRPL particularly prohibit the event from happening while calling the former Riot official’s contentions nonsense.

Schwartz澄清說，XRPL代碼中沒有網絡規則將允許活動。 Ripple CTO解釋說，XRPL節點執行的網絡規則特別禁止事件發生，同時稱這位前Riot官員的爭論廢話。

In addition, Schwartz pointed out that unlimited token creation is impossible in XRPL because of its sophisticated invariant checking system. The same function prevents even software bugs from minting new tokens, similar to what happened during Bitcoin’s value overflow incident in August 2010 and the DAO hack in June 2016.

此外，Schwartz指出，由於其複雜的不變檢查系統，XRPL不可能在XRPL中創建無限的令牌。相同的功能甚至可以防止軟件錯誤鑄造新的代幣，這類似於2010年8月比特幣價值溢出事件和2016年6月的DAO黑客術中發生的事情。

Along the way, a Ripple developer operating under the alias “Vet” on X also reinforced Schwartz’s arguments.

一路上，在X上的別名“獸醫”下運行的連鎖開發人員也加強了施瓦茨的論點。

This was perfectly demonstrated during XRPL’s outage last month, wherein its system eventually self-repaired, and no assets were reportedly lost during the event.

這是在XRPL上個月停電期間完美證明的，該系統最終自我修復，據報導在活動期間沒有資產損失。

Moreover, Hamilton highlighted the fact that due to XRPL’s invariant checks, there was never an incident in XRP history that resulted in the manipulation of its supply, like the infamous Bitcoin incident more than a decade ago.

此外，漢密爾頓強調了一個事實，即由於XRPL的不變檢查，XRP歷史上從未發生過事件導致其供應的操縱，例如十多年前臭名昭著的比特幣事件。