数学家和作者弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）建议比特币在美中贸易战中节省空间

这是一美元弱美元的后面，但元素也不是替代解决方案，而弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）则打电话给比特币。

Mathematician and author Fred Krueger suggests Bitcoin is saving space in US-China trade war, referring to a recent statement by FOX Business senior correspondent Charles Gasparino. This is on the back of a weakening US dollar, but the yuan isn’t an alternative solution either, and Fred Krueger calls Bitcoin.

数学家和作家弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）建议比特币在美国 - 中国贸易战中节省空间，指的是Fox Business高级通讯员查尔斯·加斯帕里诺（Charles Gasparino）的最新声明。这是一美元弱美元的后面，但元素也不是替代解决方案，而弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）则打电话给比特币。

More on Fred Krueger’s Comments and What He Refers To

有关弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）的评论以及他所指的内容的更多信息

Let’s begin with the most important part — who is making these statements. Fred Krueger is not only a crypto enthusiast and the author of the well-known book The Big Bitcoin Book — he is a mathematician with a PhD from Stanford. And that matters: he was shaped by a strict academic tradition, not just market trends, which means his interest might not be purely market-driven but also academic.

让我们从最重要的部分开始 - 谁在做这些陈述。弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）不仅是加密人物的爱好者，也是著名书籍《大比特币》一书的作者 - 他是一位数学家，拥有斯坦福大学的博士学位。很重要的是：他受到严格的学术传统的影响，不仅是市场趋势，这意味着他的兴趣可能不是纯粹是市场驱动的，而且也不是学术性的。

Of course, this is a subjective judgment, but a person’s background inevitably influences how they think and perceive things. People from an academic environment often look at any industry more broadly — and that can be very useful. That’s the case here as well: at least judging by his multiple posts on X, he frames his view as a mathematical one.

当然，这是一个主观的判断，但是一个人的背景不可避免地会影响他们的思维方式和感知事物。来自学术环境的人们通常会更广泛地看待任何行业 - 这可能非常有用。这里也是如此：至少从他在X上的多个帖子来判断，他将自己的观点视为数学。

It’s in this context that he responded to a recent comment by FOX Business senior correspondent Charles Gasparino, which was primarily economic in nature.

在这种情况下，他回应了Fox Business高级通讯员Charles Gasparino最近的评论，该评论本质上主要是经济的。

It's pretty obvious that the Team Trump thinks they're operating from a position of strength in the trade battle; it can throw out conflicting signals, it can levy historically high trade barriers, it can threaten it's not negotiating but demanding the world bend to our will…

很明显，特朗普团队认为他们在贸易斗争中的实力位置运作。它可能会抛出矛盾的信号，它可能在历史上征收较高的贸易障碍，它可能威胁到它不是在谈判，但要求世界弯腰我们的意志……

His statement comes in the context of dollar dynamics. And although the DXY doesn’t look as weak right now as it did when it dropped below 100 just a few days ago — the fluctuations have been intense.

他的声明是在美元动力的背景下出现的。尽管DXY现在看起来不如几天前降至100以下时那样虚弱，但波动一直很剧烈。

Let’s also recall that we’ve seen record dynamics in 10- and even 30-year US Treasury bonds, which, combined with ongoing tariffs, continue to raise concerns.

我们还记得，我们已经看到了10年甚至30年的美国国债的创纪录动态，加上持续的关税，继续引起人们的关注。

Fred Krueger, it seems, didn’t just want to criticize the situation — he offered a solution: Bitcoin.

看来，弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）不仅想批评这种情况 - 他提供了一种解决方案：比特币。

"The world needs to put it's savings space and it ain't China"— Charles Gasparino.

查尔斯·加斯帕里诺（Charles Gasparino）：“世界需要放置它的储蓄空间，而不是中国”。

"It's Bitcoin"— Fred Krueger

“是比特币” - 弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）

He didn’t specify his reasoning, but it’s not hard to guess. While Bitcoin is certainly volatile — something that must always be kept in mind — it is, by nature, nonnational, decentralized, and independent. Especially when viewed through the lens of game theory, Bitcoin is the least dependent on individual decision-makers.

他没有指定自己的理由，但这并不难猜。虽然比特币肯定是波动的 - 必须始终牢记的东西 - 从本质上讲，非国家，分散且独立。尤其是通过游戏理论的视角进行观察，比特币是最不依赖个人决策者的。

What’s interesting is that while Fred Krueger doesn’t limit his preference to Bitcoin, he doesn’t advise considering Ethereum — comparing it to MySpace (yes, the once-dominant social network most people have forgotten). His argument is that Ethereum isn’t bad and has accomplished a lot — but with competitors offering similar functionality and greater efficiency, he recommends looking at them instead.

有趣的是，尽管弗雷德·克鲁格（Fred Krueger）并没有限制他对比特币的偏爱，但他不建议考虑以太坊 - 将其与myspace进行比较（是的，大多数人忘记了曾经主导的社交网络）。他的论点是，以太坊还不错，而且取得了很多成就 - 但是，由于竞争对手提供了类似的功能和更高的效率，他建议看一下它们。

Contrary to what most maxi's say, both spaces are valuable. The problem is that ETH is no longer winning it's category.

与大多数马克西所说的相反，两个空间都是有价值的。问题是ETH不再赢得其类别。

It's myspace. Not meta.

是myspace。不是元。

Naturally, he’s referring to Solana — but in my view, this starts to contradict his logic since Ethereum is still more resilient to centralization.

自然，他指的是索拉纳（Solana） - 但我认为，这开始与他的逻辑相矛盾，因为以太坊仍然对集中化更具弹性。

Conclusion

结论

A reasonable argument in favor of Bitcoin, especially against the backdrop of today’s political and economic climate — where power is becoming increasingly polarized, and decisions are being made at a rapid pace. Stay tuned for updates, be adaptive in the rapidly evolving regulation, financial, and crypto landscape, and keep your strategy grounded, balanced, and beneficial.

一个合理的论点支持比特币，尤其是在当今政治和经济氛围的背景下 - 权力变得越来越两极化，并且决策正在迅速做出。请继续关注更新，在迅速发展的法规，财务和加密环境中进行适应性，并保持策略扎根，平衡和有益。