數學家和作者弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）建議比特幣在美中貿易戰中節省空間

這是一美元弱美元的後面，但元素也不是替代解決方案，而弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）則打電話給比特幣。

Mathematician and author Fred Krueger suggests Bitcoin is saving space in US-China trade war, referring to a recent statement by FOX Business senior correspondent Charles Gasparino. This is on the back of a weakening US dollar, but the yuan isn’t an alternative solution either, and Fred Krueger calls Bitcoin.

數學家和作家弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）建議比特幣在美國 - 中國貿易戰中節省空間，指的是Fox Business高級通訊員查爾斯·加斯帕里諾（Charles Gasparino）的最新聲明。這是一美元弱美元的後面，但元素也不是替代解決方案，而弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）則打電話給比特幣。

More on Fred Krueger’s Comments and What He Refers To

有關弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）的評論以及他所指的內容的更多信息

Let’s begin with the most important part — who is making these statements. Fred Krueger is not only a crypto enthusiast and the author of the well-known book The Big Bitcoin Book — he is a mathematician with a PhD from Stanford. And that matters: he was shaped by a strict academic tradition, not just market trends, which means his interest might not be purely market-driven but also academic.

讓我們從最重要的部分開始 - 誰在做這些陳述。弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）不僅是加密人物的愛好者，也是著名書籍《大比特幣》一書的作者 - 他是一位數學家，擁有斯坦福大學的博士學位。很重要的是：他受到嚴格的學術傳統的影響，不僅是市場趨勢，這意味著他的興趣可能不是純粹是市場驅動的，而且也不是學術性的。

Of course, this is a subjective judgment, but a person’s background inevitably influences how they think and perceive things. People from an academic environment often look at any industry more broadly — and that can be very useful. That’s the case here as well: at least judging by his multiple posts on X, he frames his view as a mathematical one.

當然，這是一個主觀的判斷，但是一個人的背景不可避免地會影響他們的思維方式和感知事物。來自學術環境的人們通常會更廣泛地看待任何行業 - 這可能非常有用。這裡也是如此：至少從他在X上的多個帖子來判斷，他將自己的觀點視為數學。

It’s in this context that he responded to a recent comment by FOX Business senior correspondent Charles Gasparino, which was primarily economic in nature.

在這種情況下，他回應了Fox Business高級通訊員Charles Gasparino最近的評論，該評論本質上主要是經濟的。

It's pretty obvious that the Team Trump thinks they're operating from a position of strength in the trade battle; it can throw out conflicting signals, it can levy historically high trade barriers, it can threaten it's not negotiating but demanding the world bend to our will…

很明顯，特朗普團隊認為他們在貿易鬥爭中的實力位置運作。它可能會拋出矛盾的信號，它可能在歷史上徵收較高的貿易障礙，它可能威脅到它不是在談判，但要求世界彎腰我們的意志……

His statement comes in the context of dollar dynamics. And although the DXY doesn’t look as weak right now as it did when it dropped below 100 just a few days ago — the fluctuations have been intense.

他的聲明是在美元動力的背景下出現的。儘管DXY現在看起來不如幾天前降至100以下時那樣虛弱，但波動一直很劇烈。

Let’s also recall that we’ve seen record dynamics in 10- and even 30-year US Treasury bonds, which, combined with ongoing tariffs, continue to raise concerns.

我們還記得，我們已經看到了10年甚至30年的美國國債的創紀錄動態，加上持續的關稅，繼續引起人們的關注。

Fred Krueger, it seems, didn’t just want to criticize the situation — he offered a solution: Bitcoin.

看來，弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）不僅想批評這種情況 - 他提供了一種解決方案：比特幣。

"The world needs to put it's savings space and it ain't China"— Charles Gasparino.

查爾斯·加斯帕里諾（Charles Gasparino）：“世界需要放置它的儲蓄空間，而不是中國”。

"It's Bitcoin"— Fred Krueger

“是比特幣” - 弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）

He didn’t specify his reasoning, but it’s not hard to guess. While Bitcoin is certainly volatile — something that must always be kept in mind — it is, by nature, nonnational, decentralized, and independent. Especially when viewed through the lens of game theory, Bitcoin is the least dependent on individual decision-makers.

他沒有指定自己的理由，但這並不難猜。雖然比特幣肯定是波動的 - 必須始終牢記的東西 - 從本質上講，非國家，分散且獨立。尤其是通過遊戲理論的視角進行觀察，比特幣是最不依賴個人決策者的。

What’s interesting is that while Fred Krueger doesn’t limit his preference to Bitcoin, he doesn’t advise considering Ethereum — comparing it to MySpace (yes, the once-dominant social network most people have forgotten). His argument is that Ethereum isn’t bad and has accomplished a lot — but with competitors offering similar functionality and greater efficiency, he recommends looking at them instead.

有趣的是，儘管弗雷德·克魯格（Fred Krueger）並沒有限制他對比特幣的偏愛，但他不建議考慮以太坊 - 將其與myspace進行比較（是的，大多數人忘記了曾經主導的社交網絡）。他的論點是，以太坊還不錯，而且取得了很多成就 - 但是，由於競爭對手提供了類似的功能和更高的效率，他建議看一下它們。

Contrary to what most maxi's say, both spaces are valuable. The problem is that ETH is no longer winning it's category.

與大多數馬克西所說的相反，兩個空間都是有價值的。問題是ETH不再贏得其類別。

It's myspace. Not meta.

是myspace。不是元。

Naturally, he’s referring to Solana — but in my view, this starts to contradict his logic since Ethereum is still more resilient to centralization.

自然，他指的是索拉納（Solana） - 但我認為，這開始與他的邏輯相矛盾，因為以太坊仍然對集中化更具彈性。

Conclusion

結論

A reasonable argument in favor of Bitcoin, especially against the backdrop of today’s political and economic climate — where power is becoming increasingly polarized, and decisions are being made at a rapid pace. Stay tuned for updates, be adaptive in the rapidly evolving regulation, financial, and crypto landscape, and keep your strategy grounded, balanced, and beneficial.

一個合理的論點支持比特幣，尤其是在當今政治和經濟氛圍的背景下 - 權力變得越來越兩極化，並且決策正在迅速做出。請繼續關注更新，在迅速發展的法規，財務和加密環境中進行適應性，並保持策略紮根，平衡和有益。