Bitget首席执行官Gracy Chen谴责Hypliquid对果冻代币事件的处理

Bitget的首席执行官Gracy Chen谴责了Hyplliquid，以解决对涉及果冻令牌的可疑事件的担忧。

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has criticized Hyperliquid for its response to concerns over a suspicious event involving the JELLY token, which has led to suspicions about the blockchain network’s over-centralization.

Bitget首席执行官Gracy Chen批评了Hyproliquid对涉及果冻代币的可疑事件的担忧的反应，这引起了人们对区块链网络过度偏心化的怀疑。

After discovering “evidence of suspicious market activity,” Hyperliquid delisted the JELLY token perpetual futures and began refunding users on March 26.

在发现了“可疑市场活动的证据”后，Hypliquid将果冻代币永久期货脱颖而出，并于3月26日开始退还用户。

However, only a limited number of validators participated in the decision, which sparked further concerns over Hyperliquid’s level of decentralization.

但是，只有有限数量的验证者参与了该决定，这对超流动性的权力下放水平引发了进一步的关注。

In a statement, Chen slammed Hyperliquid’s actions, warning that the network could become “FTX 2.0.”

在一份声明中，陈抨击了超流动性的行动，警告该网络可能成为“ FTX 2.0”。

“Despite presenting itself as an innovative decentralized exchange with a bold vision, Hyperliquid is acting more like an offshore [centralized exchange],” Chen said.

Chen说：“尽管以大胆的愿景表现为一种创新的分散交流，但高流动性的行为更像是离岸的[集中式交流]。”

“Hyperliquid may be on track to become FTX 2.0.”

“超流动可能会成为FTX 2.0。”

Sam Bankman-Fried founded the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, which collapsed unexpectedly in 2022. A U.S. court later found him guilty of fraud sentencing him to jail.

山姆·班克曼（Sam Bankman）fried建立了加密货币交易所FTX，该FTX在2022年意外倒塌。

Although Chen did not allege any legal wrongdoing, she described Hyperliquid’s approach as “immature, unethical, and unprofessional.”

尽管陈没有指控任何法律上的不法行为，但她将超流动性的方法描述为“不成熟，不道德和不专业”。

“The decision to close the $JELLY market and force settlement of positions at a favorable price sets a dangerous precedent,” said Chen.

Chen说：“决定以良好的价格关闭$果冻市场并以良好的价格定居职位的决定是危险的先例。”

“Trust—not capital—is the foundation of any exchange […] and once lost, it’s almost impossible to recover.”

“信任 - 不是资本 - 是任何交流的基础[…]，一旦失去，几乎不可能恢复。”

Venmo co-founder Iqram Magdon-Ismail launched the JELLY token in January as part of his project, JellyJelly, an effort to expand into Web3 social media.

Venmo联合创始人Iqram Magdon-Ismail在1月份推出了Jellyjelly的一部分，以果冻的速度推出了果冻代币，这是为了扩展到Web3社交媒体的努力。

The JELLY token’s market value reached nearly $250 million before dropping to just a few million in the following weeks, according to DexScreener.

Dexscreener称，果冻代币的市场价值达到了近2.5亿美元，然后在接下来的几周内下降到只有几百万美元。

After Binance debuted perpetual futures tied to JELLY, the token’s market capitalization rose to about $25 million on March 26. On the same day, a Hyperliquid trader “opened a massive $6 million short position on JellyJelly and then deliberately self-liquidated by pumping JellyJelly’s price on-chain,” noted Abhi, founder of Web3 company AP Collective.

After Binance debuted perpetual futures tied to JELLY, the token's market capitalization rose to about $25 million on March 26. On the same day, a Hyperliquid trader “opened a massive $6 million short position on JellyJelly and then deliberately self-liquidated by pumping JellyJelly's price on-chain,” noted Abhi, founder of Web3 company AP Collective.

BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes believes that early assessments exaggerated the potential harm the JELLY incident could have on Hyperliquid’s reputation.

Bitmex的亚瑟·海斯（Arthur Hayes）认为，早期评估夸大了果冻事件可能对超流体声誉造成的潜在伤害。

“Let’s stop pretending hyperliquid is decentralised. And then stop pretending traders actually [care],” Hayes wrote in an X post. “Bet you $HYPE is back where it started in short order cause degens gonna degen.”

海斯在X帖子中写道：“让我们停止假装超流动性被分散了。然后停止假装交易者实际上[护理]。” “打赌你$ hype又回来了，它在短期内开始，原因是degen。”

On March 12, Hyperliquid encountered another crisis when a whale attempted to exit a large long Ether position, valued at around $200 million.

3月12日，当一条鲸鱼试图退出一个巨大的长以太货币，价值2亿美元的较大的较长的以太位置时，超级流动遇到了另一个危机。

However, the attempt failed due to insufficient liquidity, leading to the forced liquidation of the trade at unfavorable prices. As a result, Hyperliquid’s own liquidity pool, HLP, absorbed a loss of nearly $4 million, which will be distributed among depositors.

但是，由于流动性不足，该尝试失败了，导致以不利的价格被迫清算交易。结果，HLP超流动性的流动性池吸收了将近400万美元的损失，这将分配到储户之间。

In response to the potential knock-on effects of significant trades at close on Hyperliquid’s liquidity pool, the protocol has increased the collateral demands for open positions.

为了应对超流动性流动性库的重大交易的潜在敲击影响，该协议增加了对开放位置的附带需求。

A January report from VanEck disclosed that Hyperliquid holds the largest share of the leveraged perpetuals trading market, with about 70% of the total volume.

Vaneck的一月份报告透露，Hyplliquid拥有杠杆永久交易市场中最大的份额，约占总数的70％。

Perpetual futures, also known as perps, allow leveraged trading without a maturity date and require traders to secure their positions with collateral, such as USDC.

永久期货，也称为PERP，允许杠杆交易不到期日期，并要求交易者使用抵押品（例如USDC）确保其头寸。

According to L2Beat, Hyperliquid relies on two key validator groups, each comprising four validators. In contrast, Solana and Ethereum utilize approximately 1,000 and 1 million validators, respectively.

根据L2Beat的说法，超液体依赖两个关键验证器组，每个组包括四个验证器。相比之下，Solana和Ethereum分别使用了大约1,000和100万验证器。

Increasing the number of validators makes it more difficult for a small group of individuals to influence or manipulate a blockchain.

增加验证器的数量使一小部分个人更难影响或操纵区块链。