XRP訴訟和解等待托雷斯法官的決定

Ripple於4月23日申請和解，SEC於5月8日提交了該協議。雙方共同提交了第62.1條動議，尋求托雷斯法官的指示性裁決。

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple have filed a joint motion for an indicative ruling on their proposed settlement in the ongoing lawsuit.

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）和Ripple已對正在進行的訴訟提出的和解的指示性裁決提出了共同的動議。

Both parties are seeking Judge Analisa Torres's view on the proposed stipulation of settlement, aiming to bring the case to a close after nearly three years of litigation.

雙方都在尋求Analisa Torres法官對擬議的和解規定的觀點，旨在將案件結束，經過將近三年的訴訟。

The parties mutually filed the Rule 62.1 motion on Friday, May 8, detailing the planned next steps in the case.

雙方於5月8日星期五共同提出了規則62.1動議，詳細介紹了該案計劃的下一步。

The application for an indicative ruling is in response to a pending appeal by the SEC and a cross-appeal by Ripple. Both parties had moved to stay the appeal and cross-appeal pending the judge's input on the proposed settlement.

指示性裁定的申請是對SEC待定的上訴和Ripple的交叉上訴。雙方都採取行動保持上訴，並在法官對擬議和解的意見之前進行交叉上訴。

Judge Torres previously granted a motion to intervene in the case to 78,000 XRP holders, who are largely supportive of Ripple. They are being represented by attorney John Deaton.

托雷斯法官此前批准了對78,000個XRP持有人進行干預的動議，這些XRP持有人在很大程度上支持波紋。他們由約翰·迪頓（John Deaton）律師代表。

The parties also agreed to reduce the civil penalty to $50 million and dissolve the injunction.

雙方還同意將民事罰款減少到5000萬美元，並解散禁令。

The judge's approval isn't guaranteed and will require her to perform an independent public interest assessment of the relief sought, explained lawyer Bill Morgan.

律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）解釋說，法官的批准不能保證，將要求她對尋求的救濟進行獨立的公共利益評估。

"The court must determine whether the relief sought meets legal standards, even with mutual agreement. It's a pivotal decision that will decide if the case continues or if it's time to bring it to a close."

“法院必須確定尋求的救濟是否達到法律標準，即使達成共同協議。這是一個關鍵的決定，將決定該案是否繼續，還是該結束該案。”

The judge's ruling will decide if the parties can proceed with these planned actions. If Judge Torres grants the parties' request for an indicative ruling, she will return the case to the Court of Appeals for remand.

法官的裁決將決定當事方是否可以採取這些計劃的行動。如果托雷斯法官批准了當事方的指示性裁決的請求，她將把案件返還給上訴法院的還款。

The parties will then move to enforce the agreed settlement terms once the limited remand is granted. This will involve Ripple paying the agreed fine and both parties formally dismissing their respective appeals.

然後，一旦授予有限的還押，當事方將採取行動執行約定的和解條款。這將涉及波紋支付約定的罰款，雙方正式駁回各自的上訴。

The parties will then move to close out the case.

然後，各方將移動以結束案件。

The parties jointly applied for an indicative ruling from Judge Analisa Torres on the proposed stipulation of settlement. Both parties had moved to stay the appeal and cross-appeal pending the judge's input on the proposed settlement.

當事方共同申請了Analisa Torres法官對擬議定居的規定的指示性裁決。雙方都採取行動保持上訴，並在法官對擬議和解的意見之前進行交叉上訴。

The parties also agreed to reduce the civil penalty to $50 million and dissolve the injunction. Judge Torres's approval isn't guaranteed and will require her to perform an independent public interest assessment of the relief sought, explained lawyer Bill Morgan.

雙方還同意將民事罰款減少到5000萬美元，並解散禁令。律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）解釋說，托雷斯法官的批准不能保證，將要求她對尋求的救濟進行獨立的公共利益評估。

"The judge must determine whether the relief sought meets legal standards, even with mutual agreement. It's a pivotal decision that will decide if the case continues or if it's time to bring it to a close."

“法官必須確定尋求的救濟是否達到法律標準，即使達成了共同的協議。這是一個關鍵的決定，它將決定該案是否持續下去，還是該結束了。”

The judge's ruling will decide if the parties can proceed with these planned actions. If Judge Torres grants the parties' request for an indicative ruling, she will return the case to the Court of Appeals for remand.

法官的裁決將決定當事方是否可以採取這些計劃的行動。如果托雷斯法官批准了當事方的指示性裁決的請求，她將把案件返還給上訴法院的還款。

The parties will then move to enforce the agreed settlement terms once the limited remand is granted. This will involve Ripple paying the agreed fine and both parties formally dismissing their respective appeals.

然後，一旦授予有限的還押，當事方將採取行動執行約定的和解條款。這將涉及波紋支付約定的罰款，雙方正式駁回各自的上訴。

The parties will then move to close out the case.

然後，各方將移動以結束案件。