XRP诉讼和解等待托雷斯法官的决定

Ripple于4月23日申请和解，SEC于5月8日提交了该协议。双方共同提交了第62.1条动议，寻求托雷斯法官的指示性裁决。

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple have filed a joint motion for an indicative ruling on their proposed settlement in the ongoing lawsuit.

美国证券交易委员会（SEC）和Ripple已对正在进行的诉讼提出的和解的指示性裁决提出了共同的动议。

Both parties are seeking Judge Analisa Torres's view on the proposed stipulation of settlement, aiming to bring the case to a close after nearly three years of litigation.

双方都在寻求Analisa Torres法官对拟议的和解规定的观点，旨在将案件结束，经过将近三年的诉讼。

The parties mutually filed the Rule 62.1 motion on Friday, May 8, detailing the planned next steps in the case.

双方于5月8日星期五共同提出了规则62.1动议，详细介绍了该案计划的下一步。

The application for an indicative ruling is in response to a pending appeal by the SEC and a cross-appeal by Ripple. Both parties had moved to stay the appeal and cross-appeal pending the judge's input on the proposed settlement.

指示性裁定的申请是对SEC待定的上诉和Ripple的交叉上诉。双方都采取行动保持上诉，并在法官对拟议和解的意见之前进行交叉上诉。

Judge Torres previously granted a motion to intervene in the case to 78,000 XRP holders, who are largely supportive of Ripple. They are being represented by attorney John Deaton.

托雷斯法官此前批准了对78,000个XRP持有人进行干预的动议，这些XRP持有人在很大程度上支持波纹。他们由约翰·迪顿（John Deaton）律师代表。

The parties also agreed to reduce the civil penalty to $50 million and dissolve the injunction.

双方还同意将民事罚款减少到5000万美元，并解散禁令。

The judge's approval isn't guaranteed and will require her to perform an independent public interest assessment of the relief sought, explained lawyer Bill Morgan.

律师比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）解释说，法官的批准不能保证，将要求她对寻求的救济进行独立的公共利益评估。

"The court must determine whether the relief sought meets legal standards, even with mutual agreement. It's a pivotal decision that will decide if the case continues or if it's time to bring it to a close."

“法院必须确定寻求的救济是否达到法律标准，即使达成共同协议。这是一个关键的决定，将决定该案是否继续，还是该结束该案。”

The judge's ruling will decide if the parties can proceed with these planned actions. If Judge Torres grants the parties' request for an indicative ruling, she will return the case to the Court of Appeals for remand.

法官的裁决将决定当事方是否可以采取这些计划的行动。如果托雷斯法官批准了当事方的指示性裁决的请求，她将把案件返还给上诉法院的还款。

The parties will then move to enforce the agreed settlement terms once the limited remand is granted. This will involve Ripple paying the agreed fine and both parties formally dismissing their respective appeals.

然后，一旦授予有限的还押，当事方将采取行动执行约定的和解条款。这将涉及波纹支付约定的罚款，双方正式驳回各自的上诉。

The parties will then move to close out the case.

然后，各方将移动以结束案件。

The parties jointly applied for an indicative ruling from Judge Analisa Torres on the proposed stipulation of settlement. Both parties had moved to stay the appeal and cross-appeal pending the judge's input on the proposed settlement.

当事方共同申请了Analisa Torres法官对拟议定居的规定的指示性裁决。双方都采取行动保持上诉，并在法官对拟议和解的意见之前进行交叉上诉。

The parties also agreed to reduce the civil penalty to $50 million and dissolve the injunction. Judge Torres's approval isn't guaranteed and will require her to perform an independent public interest assessment of the relief sought, explained lawyer Bill Morgan.

双方还同意将民事罚款减少到5000万美元，并解散禁令。律师比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）解释说，托雷斯法官的批准不能保证，将要求她对寻求的救济进行独立的公共利益评估。

"The judge must determine whether the relief sought meets legal standards, even with mutual agreement. It's a pivotal decision that will decide if the case continues or if it's time to bring it to a close."

“法官必须确定寻求的救济是否达到法律标准，即使达成了共同的协议。这是一个关键的决定，它将决定该案是否持续下去，还是该结束了。”

The judge's ruling will decide if the parties can proceed with these planned actions. If Judge Torres grants the parties' request for an indicative ruling, she will return the case to the Court of Appeals for remand.

法官的裁决将决定当事方是否可以采取这些计划的行动。如果托雷斯法官批准了当事方的指示性裁决的请求，她将把案件返还给上诉法院的还款。

The parties will then move to enforce the agreed settlement terms once the limited remand is granted. This will involve Ripple paying the agreed fine and both parties formally dismissing their respective appeals.

然后，一旦授予有限的还押，当事方将采取行动执行约定的和解条款。这将涉及波纹支付约定的罚款，双方正式驳回各自的上诉。

The parties will then move to close out the case.

然后，各方将移动以结束案件。