儘管撤消了Ripple，但XRP訴訟可能還沒有結束。 SEC上訴是可能的，律師警告此案仍未解決。

XRP Lawsuit: SEC Appeal Looms, Lawyer Warns – Is It Really Over?

XRP訴訟：SEC上訴迫在眉睫，律師警告說 - 真的結束了嗎？

The XRP community's celebration might be premature. While Ripple has dropped its cross-appeal, the possibility of an SEC appeal keeps the legal drama alive. Could this long-fought battle have another chapter?

XRP社區的慶祝活動可能為時過早。儘管Ripple放棄了交叉上訴，但SEC上訴的可能性使法律戲劇保持了活力。這場長期戰鬥的戰鬥還能還有另一章嗎？

The Unresolved XRP Lawsuit: A Lawyer's Perspective

未解決的XRP訴訟：律師的觀點

Despite the general celebratory mood, former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel throws a wet blanket on the 'case closed' narrative. He asserts that the XRP lawsuit remains unresolved until the SEC officially drops its appeal. Fagel's perspective, shared on X, suggests the SEC's previous vote might not have included the authority to drop the appeal, raising questions about the commission's next move. This is further complicated by the unusual nature of the case itself. As Fagel himself states, "...we don’t know what exactly they voted on—it would be unusual for them to have simultaneously voted to approve both options, but nothing about this is normal."

儘管心情普遍，但前SEC律師馬克·法格爾（Marc Fagel）在“案件封閉”的敘述上扔了一條濕毯子。他斷言XRP訴訟仍未解決，直到SEC正式提出上訴為止。 Fagel在X上分享的觀點表明，SEC先前的投票可能不包括放棄上訴的權力，提出了有關委員會下一步行動的疑問。案件本身的異常性質使這更加複雜。正如Fagel本人所說：“ ...我們不知道他們到底投票了 - 他們同時投票批准這兩種選擇是不尋常的，但這並不是正常的。”

SEC's Appeal: A Lingering Threat?

SEC的上訴：揮之不去的威脅？

The SEC's decision to appeal parts of the summary judgment significantly altered Ripple’s litigation stance. Earlier, Ripple seemed willing to accept the court’s finding on institutional sales, but now it appears more aggressive. Legal analysts suggest the SEC’s move influenced Ripple’s decision to contest earlier unfavorable rulings.

SEC對簡易判決部分提出上訴的決定大大改變了Ripple的訴訟立場。早些時候，Ripple似乎願意接受法院對機構銷售的裁決，但現在看起來更具侵略性。法律分析師認為，SEC的舉動影響了Ripple決定對較早的不利裁決的決定。

Was Settling a Mistake? A Counter-Narrative

解決錯誤了嗎？反敘事

Amidst the talk of settlement, some critics argue that Ripple's actions are an admission of guilt. However, XRP lawyer Bill Morgan firmly rejects this notion, emphasizing that settlements are not admissions of fault. He also clarifies that Ripple's win isn't solely about XRP not being a security in retail use. Instead, the crucial victory lies in the court's ruling that XRP itself, regardless of sales context, isn't a security, potentially classifying it more as a commodity.

在談論解決方案中，一些批評家認為，波紋的行動是對內gui的承認。但是，XRP律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）堅定地拒絕了這一觀念，強調定居點不是承認過錯。他還澄清說，Ripple的勝利不僅僅是XRP不是零售業的安全性。取而代之的是，至關重要的勝利在於法院的裁決，即XRP本身，無論銷售背景如何，都不是安全性，而是將其歸類為商品。

Ripple's Stance: Ready for a Broader Challenge

Ripple的立場：準備更廣泛的挑戰

Ripple's willingness to appeal the institutional sales ruling may depend on the penalties imposed. If the judge imposes harsh remedies, Ripple is expected to challenge the original finding. This legal move could extend the case and potentially reach higher courts.

Ripple願意對機構銷售裁決提出上訴的意願可能取決於施加的處罰。如果法官實施嚴厲的補救措施，則預計Ripple會挑戰原始發現。這一法律措施可能會延長此案，並有可能到達更高的法院。

Looking Ahead: What's Next?

展望未來：下一步是什麼？

While Ripple is dropping its cross-appeal and the SEC is expected to follow suit, according to Brad Garlinghouse's announcement, the final chapter isn't written yet. Judge Torres had suggested dropping the appeals to end the litigation. If the SEC does drop its appeal, the $50 million settlement, agreed upon as an alternative to the original $125 million penalty, would likely proceed, finally concluding this saga.

根據布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）的宣布，雖然Ripple放棄了其交叉上訴，並且預計SEC將效仿，但最後一章尚未寫。托雷斯法官建議放棄上訴以結束訴訟。如果SEC確實放棄了上訴，那麼這項耗資5000萬美元的和解商定為原始$ 1.25億美元的罰款，最終將繼續結束這個傳奇。

The Bottom Line

底線

So, is the XRP lawsuit *really* over? Maybe not just yet. Keep your eyes peeled, folks. This legal rollercoaster might have a few more dips and turns before it pulls into the station. But hey, at least the crypto world keeps things interesting, right?

那麼，XRP訴訟 *真的 *結束了嗎？也許不只是。伙計們，睜大眼睛。這款合法的過山車可能會再有幾次傾斜，然後才能進入車站。但是，嘿，至少加密世界使事情變得有趣，對嗎？