尽管撤消了Ripple，但XRP诉讼可能还没有结束。 SEC上诉是可能的，律师警告此案仍未解决。

XRP Lawsuit: SEC Appeal Looms, Lawyer Warns – Is It Really Over?

XRP诉讼：SEC上诉迫在眉睫，律师警告说 - 真的结束了吗？

The XRP community's celebration might be premature. While Ripple has dropped its cross-appeal, the possibility of an SEC appeal keeps the legal drama alive. Could this long-fought battle have another chapter?

XRP社区的庆祝活动可能为时过早。尽管Ripple放弃了交叉上诉，但SEC上诉的可能性使法律戏剧保持了活力。这场长期战斗的战斗还能还有另一章吗？

The Unresolved XRP Lawsuit: A Lawyer's Perspective

未解决的XRP诉讼：律师的观点

Despite the general celebratory mood, former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel throws a wet blanket on the 'case closed' narrative. He asserts that the XRP lawsuit remains unresolved until the SEC officially drops its appeal. Fagel's perspective, shared on X, suggests the SEC's previous vote might not have included the authority to drop the appeal, raising questions about the commission's next move. This is further complicated by the unusual nature of the case itself. As Fagel himself states, "...we don’t know what exactly they voted on—it would be unusual for them to have simultaneously voted to approve both options, but nothing about this is normal."

尽管心情普遍，但前SEC律师马克·法格尔（Marc Fagel）在“案件封闭”的叙述上扔了一条湿毯子。他断言XRP诉讼仍未解决，直到SEC正式提出上诉为止。 Fagel在X上分享的观点表明，SEC先前的投票可能不包括放弃上诉的权力，提出了有关委员会下一步行动的疑问。案件本身的异常性质使这更加复杂。正如Fagel本人所说：“ ...我们不知道他们到底投票了 - 他们同时投票批准这两种选择是不寻常的，但这并不是正常的。”

SEC's Appeal: A Lingering Threat?

SEC的上诉：挥之不去的威胁？

The SEC's decision to appeal parts of the summary judgment significantly altered Ripple’s litigation stance. Earlier, Ripple seemed willing to accept the court’s finding on institutional sales, but now it appears more aggressive. Legal analysts suggest the SEC’s move influenced Ripple’s decision to contest earlier unfavorable rulings.

SEC对简易判决部分提出上诉的决定大大改变了Ripple的诉讼立场。早些时候，Ripple似乎愿意接受法院对机构销售的裁决，但现在看起来更具侵略性。法律分析师认为，SEC的举动影响了Ripple决定对较早的不利裁决的决定。

Was Settling a Mistake? A Counter-Narrative

解决错误了吗？反叙事

Amidst the talk of settlement, some critics argue that Ripple's actions are an admission of guilt. However, XRP lawyer Bill Morgan firmly rejects this notion, emphasizing that settlements are not admissions of fault. He also clarifies that Ripple's win isn't solely about XRP not being a security in retail use. Instead, the crucial victory lies in the court's ruling that XRP itself, regardless of sales context, isn't a security, potentially classifying it more as a commodity.

在谈论解决方案中，一些批评家认为，波纹的行动是对内gui的承认。但是，XRP律师比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）坚定地拒绝了这一观念，强调定居点不是承认过错。他还澄清说，Ripple的胜利不仅仅是XRP不是零售业的安全性。取而代之的是，至关重要的胜利在于法院的裁决，即XRP本身，无论销售背景如何，都不是安全性，而是将其归类为商品。

Ripple's Stance: Ready for a Broader Challenge

Ripple的立场：准备更广泛的挑战

Ripple's willingness to appeal the institutional sales ruling may depend on the penalties imposed. If the judge imposes harsh remedies, Ripple is expected to challenge the original finding. This legal move could extend the case and potentially reach higher courts.

Ripple愿意对机构销售裁决提出上诉的意愿可能取决于施加的处罚。如果法官实施严厉的补救措施，则预计Ripple会挑战原始发现。这一法律措施可能会延长此案，并有可能到达更高的法院。

Looking Ahead: What's Next?

展望未来：下一步是什么？

While Ripple is dropping its cross-appeal and the SEC is expected to follow suit, according to Brad Garlinghouse's announcement, the final chapter isn't written yet. Judge Torres had suggested dropping the appeals to end the litigation. If the SEC does drop its appeal, the $50 million settlement, agreed upon as an alternative to the original $125 million penalty, would likely proceed, finally concluding this saga.

根据布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）的宣布，虽然Ripple放弃了其交叉上诉，并且预计SEC将效仿，但最后一章尚未写。托雷斯法官建议放弃上诉以结束诉讼。如果SEC确实放弃了上诉，那么这项耗资5000万美元的和解商定为原始$ 1.25亿美元的罚款，最终将继续结束这个传奇。

The Bottom Line

底线

So, is the XRP lawsuit *really* over? Maybe not just yet. Keep your eyes peeled, folks. This legal rollercoaster might have a few more dips and turns before it pulls into the station. But hey, at least the crypto world keeps things interesting, right?

那么，XRP诉讼 *真的 *结束了吗？也许不只是。伙计们，睁大眼睛。这款合法的过山车可能会再有几次倾斜，然后才能进入车站。但是，嘿，至少加密世界使事情变得有趣，对吗？