Vitalik Buterin，WorldCoin和生物識別IDS：NYC的觀點

Vitalik Buterin對WorldCoin的生物識別ID系統及其對隱私，化名和數字身份的未來的影響。

Vitalik Buterin, Worldcoin, and Biometric IDs: A NYC Perspective

Vitalik Buterin，WorldCoin和生物識別IDS：NYC的觀點

The buzz around Vitalik Buterin, Worldcoin, and biometric IDs is heating up. Buterin's recent blog posts have thrown some serious shade on the privacy implications of Worldcoin's approach. Let's dive in, shall we?

Vitalik Buterin，WorldCoin和生物識別ID周圍的嗡嗡聲正在加熱。 Buterin最近的博客文章對WorldCoin方法的隱私影響更加嚴重。讓我們潛入吧？

Buterin's Concerns: Privacy Under Threat?

Buterin的擔憂：受到威脅的隱私？

Buterin isn't just casually tweeting his concerns; he's laying out a detailed argument. His main beef? The 'one-person-one-ID' system, even with fancy zero-knowledge proofs (ZK proofs), could kill online pseudonymity. Imagine a world where everything you do online is tied to a single, traceable identity. Not ideal for whistleblowers or anyone needing a little privacy, right?

Buterin不僅隨隨便便發推文。他正在提出一個詳細的論點。他的主要牛肉？即使使用零零知識證明（ZK證明），“一人一”系統也可能會殺死在線化的匿名性。想像一個世界，您在網上所做的一切都與單個可追溯的身份息息相關。對於舉報者或需要一點隱私的任何人來說，不理想，對嗎？

ZK Proofs: Not a Silver Bullet

ZK證明：不是銀彈

Worldcoin uses ZK proofs to verify users without revealing their actual ID details. Buterin admits ZK-wrapping solves a lot of problems, especially compared to old-school methods that demand your entire legal ID for simple tasks like proving your age. But here's the kicker: these ZK-wrapped IDs often limit users to one ID per application. This means the level of pseudonymity is significantly lower than services like Google, where users can create multiple accounts.

WorldCoin使用ZK證明來驗證用戶，而無需透露其實際ID詳細信息。 Buterin承認ZK包裹解決了很多問題，尤其是與老式方法相比，這些方法需要您的整個法律ID來完成簡單的任務，例如證明您的年齡。但這是踢腳：這些ZK包裝的ID通常將用戶限制為每個應用程序的一個ID。這意味著假名的水平明顯低於Google等服務，用戶可以創建多個帳戶。

Coercion and Edge Cases: The Downside

脅迫和邊緣案件：不利一面

Buterin also points out that governments or corporations could pressure individuals to reveal their identities, defeating the purpose of privacy preservation. Plus, biometric IDs aren't foolproof. What about injuries or spoofed replicas? And what about those without government-issued IDs? These edge cases become major headaches when you're trying to maintain a 'one-per-person' system.

巴特林還指出，政府或公司可能會敦促個人揭示其身份，擊敗隱私保護的目的。另外，生物識別ID並非萬無一失。傷害或欺騙的複製品呢？那些沒有政府發行的ID的人呢？當您試圖維護“單人”系統時，這些邊緣案例將成為主要的頭痛。

The Solution: Pluralistic Identities

解決方案：多元化身份

Buterin's solution? Pluralistic identities. He envisions a system where no single authority dominates ID issuance. This could be explicit (social-graph-based identity) or implicit (accepting various ID types). The goal is to reduce coercion and be more tolerant of edge cases. However, he warns that if any single ID type gets too popular, the system could revert to a de facto 'one-per-person' setup.

Buterin的解決方案？多元化身份。他設想了一個系統，沒有任何一個機構主導ID發行。這可能是明確的（基於社會圖的身份）或隱式（接受各種ID類型）。目的是減少脅迫，對邊緣案例更耐受。但是，他警告說，如果任何單個ID類型都太受歡迎，該系統可能會恢復為事實上的“單人”設置。

Worldcoin's Wobbles: Price and Market Dynamics

WorldCoin的擺動：價格和市場動態

Meanwhile, Worldcoin (WLD) has seen its share of ups and downs. After a sharp decline, it's been stabilizing around the USDT 0.85–0.90 range. Open Interest is rising, suggesting potential repositioning in the market. Worldcoin aims to be a global identity and financial network, focusing on digital identity and AI integration. Despite recent price corrections, its utility-driven roadmap keeps it in the game.

同時，WorldCoin（WLD）看到了起伏的份額。急劇下降後，它的穩定在0.85–0.90範圍內。開放興趣正在上升，表明潛在的重新定位在市場上。 WorldCoin的目標是成為全球身份和金融網絡，重點是數字身份和AI集成。儘管最近的價格更正了，但其公用事業驅動的路線圖仍將其保留在遊戲中。

My Two Cents: Proceed with Caution

我的兩分錢：謹慎

Look, Buterin raises some valid points. The idea of a single, centralized identity system controlling our online lives is a bit dystopian, no? While Worldcoin's intentions might be noble – universal basic income, distinguishing humans from AI – the potential for misuse is real. We need to tread carefully and prioritize privacy and individual freedom as these technologies evolve.

看，Buterin提出了一些有效的觀點。控制我們在線生活的單一集中身份系統的想法有點反烏托邦，不是嗎？儘管世界幣的意圖可能是崇高的 - 普遍的基本收入，將人類與人工智學區分開來 - 濫用的潛力是真實的。隨著這些技術的發展，我們需要仔細踩踏並優先考慮隱私和個人自由。

Final Thoughts

最後的想法

So, where does this leave us? Well, the conversation around digital identity is far from over. Buterin's insights are crucial, and it's up to us to demand privacy-respecting solutions. Keep your eyes peeled, folks, because this is one space that's sure to keep evolving. Stay sassy, stay informed, and remember: your privacy is worth fighting for!

那麼，這將離開我們的地方？好吧，圍繞數字身份的對話還遠遠沒有結束。 Buterin的見解至關重要，這取決於我們需要尊重隱私的解決方案。伙計們，請保持眼睛剝皮，因為這是一個肯定會不斷發展的空間。保持狂熱，保持知情並記住：您的隱私是值得為之奮鬥的！