Vitalik Buterin，WorldCoin和生物识别IDS：NYC的观点

Vitalik Buterin对WorldCoin的生物识别ID系统及其对隐私，化名和数字身份的未来的影响。

Vitalik Buterin, Worldcoin, and Biometric IDs: A NYC Perspective

Vitalik Buterin，WorldCoin和生物识别IDS：NYC的观点

The buzz around Vitalik Buterin, Worldcoin, and biometric IDs is heating up. Buterin's recent blog posts have thrown some serious shade on the privacy implications of Worldcoin's approach. Let's dive in, shall we?

Vitalik Buterin，WorldCoin和生物识别ID周围的嗡嗡声正在加热。 Buterin最近的博客文章对WorldCoin方法的隐私影响更加严重。让我们潜入吧？

Buterin's Concerns: Privacy Under Threat?

Buterin的担忧：受到威胁的隐私？

Buterin isn't just casually tweeting his concerns; he's laying out a detailed argument. His main beef? The 'one-person-one-ID' system, even with fancy zero-knowledge proofs (ZK proofs), could kill online pseudonymity. Imagine a world where everything you do online is tied to a single, traceable identity. Not ideal for whistleblowers or anyone needing a little privacy, right?

Buterin不仅随随便便发推文。他正在提出一个详细的论点。他的主要牛肉？即使使用零零知识证明（ZK证明），“一人一”系统也可能会杀死在线化的匿名性。想象一个世界，您在网上所做的一切都与单个可追溯的身份息息相关。对于举报者或需要一点隐私的任何人来说，不理想，对吗？

ZK Proofs: Not a Silver Bullet

ZK证明：不是银弹

Worldcoin uses ZK proofs to verify users without revealing their actual ID details. Buterin admits ZK-wrapping solves a lot of problems, especially compared to old-school methods that demand your entire legal ID for simple tasks like proving your age. But here's the kicker: these ZK-wrapped IDs often limit users to one ID per application. This means the level of pseudonymity is significantly lower than services like Google, where users can create multiple accounts.

WorldCoin使用ZK证明来验证用户，而无需透露其实际ID详细信息。 Buterin承认ZK包裹解决了很多问题，尤其是与老式方法相比，这些方法需要您的整个法律ID来完成简单的任务，例如证明您的年龄。但这是踢脚：这些ZK包装的ID通常将用户限制为每个应用程序的一个ID。这意味着假名的水平明显低于Google等服务，用户可以创建多个帐户。

Coercion and Edge Cases: The Downside

胁迫和边缘案件：不利一面

Buterin also points out that governments or corporations could pressure individuals to reveal their identities, defeating the purpose of privacy preservation. Plus, biometric IDs aren't foolproof. What about injuries or spoofed replicas? And what about those without government-issued IDs? These edge cases become major headaches when you're trying to maintain a 'one-per-person' system.

巴特林还指出，政府或公司可能会敦促个人揭示其身份，击败隐私保护的目的。另外，生物识别ID并非万无一失。伤害或欺骗的复制品呢？那些没有政府发行的ID的人呢？当您试图维护“单人”系统时，这些边缘案例将成为主要的头痛。

The Solution: Pluralistic Identities

解决方案：多元化身份

Buterin's solution? Pluralistic identities. He envisions a system where no single authority dominates ID issuance. This could be explicit (social-graph-based identity) or implicit (accepting various ID types). The goal is to reduce coercion and be more tolerant of edge cases. However, he warns that if any single ID type gets too popular, the system could revert to a de facto 'one-per-person' setup.

Buterin的解决方案？多元化身份。他设想了一个系统，没有任何一个机构主导ID发行。这可能是明确的（基于社会图的身份）或隐式（接受各种ID类型）。目的是减少胁迫，对边缘案例更耐受。但是，他警告说，如果任何单个ID类型都太受欢迎，该系统可能会恢复为事实上的“单人”设置。

Worldcoin's Wobbles: Price and Market Dynamics

WorldCoin的摆动：价格和市场动态

Meanwhile, Worldcoin (WLD) has seen its share of ups and downs. After a sharp decline, it's been stabilizing around the USDT 0.85–0.90 range. Open Interest is rising, suggesting potential repositioning in the market. Worldcoin aims to be a global identity and financial network, focusing on digital identity and AI integration. Despite recent price corrections, its utility-driven roadmap keeps it in the game.

同时，WorldCoin（WLD）看到了起伏的份额。急剧下降后，它的稳定在0.85–0.90范围内。开放兴趣正在上升，表明潜在的重新定位在市场上。 WorldCoin的目标是成为全球身份和金融网络，重点是数字身份和AI集成。尽管最近的价格更正了，但其公用事业驱动的路线图仍将其保留在游戏中。

My Two Cents: Proceed with Caution

我的两分钱：谨慎

Look, Buterin raises some valid points. The idea of a single, centralized identity system controlling our online lives is a bit dystopian, no? While Worldcoin's intentions might be noble – universal basic income, distinguishing humans from AI – the potential for misuse is real. We need to tread carefully and prioritize privacy and individual freedom as these technologies evolve.

看，Buterin提出了一些有效的观点。控制我们在线生活的单一集中身份系统的想法有点反乌托邦，不是吗？尽管世界币的意图可能是崇高的 - 普遍的基本收入，将人类与人工智学区分开来 - 滥用的潜力是真实的。随着这些技术的发展，我们需要仔细踩踏并优先考虑隐私和个人自由。

Final Thoughts

最后的想法

So, where does this leave us? Well, the conversation around digital identity is far from over. Buterin's insights are crucial, and it's up to us to demand privacy-respecting solutions. Keep your eyes peeled, folks, because this is one space that's sure to keep evolving. Stay sassy, stay informed, and remember: your privacy is worth fighting for!

那么，这将离开我们的地方？好吧，围绕数字身份的对话还远远没有结束。 Buterin的见解至关重要，这取决于我们需要尊重隐私的解决方案。伙计们，请保持眼睛剥皮，因为这是一个肯定会不断发展的空间。保持狂热，保持知情并记住：您的隐私是值得为之奋斗的！