特朗普的廣泛關稅可以保持到位，而法律挑戰仍在繼續

唐納德·特朗普總統的貿易政策剛剛得到了暫時的提升。聯邦上訴法院裁定，他的廣泛關稅可以保留在原地

A federal appeals court has temporarily granted President Donald Trump’s administration the right to keep imposing broad tariffs, even though a lower court ruled that they overstepped presidential powers.

聯邦上訴法院已暫時授予唐納德·特朗普總統的政府繼續徵收廣泛關稅的權利，儘管下級法院裁定他們超越了總統權力。

The ruling upholds tariffs that Trump introduced using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to respond to illegal immigration and fentanyl smuggling, tying them to economic sanctions.

該裁決堅持特朗普使用《國際緊急經濟大國法案》（IEPA）提出的關稅，以應對非法移民和芬太尼走私，並將其與經濟制裁聯繫起來。

However, it leaves Trump’s earlier tariffs on steel, aluminum, cars, and car parts untouched. Those were enacted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which grants the president authority to impose tariffs based on national security concerns.

然而，這使特朗普對鋼，鋁，汽車和汽車零件的較早關稅未被觸及。這些是根據《貿易擴張法》第232條頒布的，該法案授予總統授權根據國家安全問題徵收關稅。

That law is separate from IEEPA and remains unaffected in this case.

該法律與IEEPA分開，在這種情況下仍然不受影響。

Earlier this year, the Court of International Trade ruled against the Trump administration, stating that the president lacked the authority to impose a 10% universal tariff, so-called reciprocal tariffs, and targeted taxes on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China.

今年早些時候，國際貿易法院裁定反對特朗普政府，稱總統缺乏對10％的普遍關稅，所謂的相互關稅，並針對從墨西哥，加拿大和中國進口的稅款的目標。

The lower court ruled that IEEPA does not grant the president the power to modify, cancel, or suspend trade agreements with another country, a claim made by the Trump administration.

下級法院裁定，伊帕（Ieepa）不授予總統修改，取消或中止與另一個國家的貿易協定的權力，這是特朗普政府提出的。

Nevertheless, the appeals court has now stayed that ruling, recognizing “substantial arguments” presented by both sides and indicating that a full review of the issue will be expedited, with a decision expected by the end of summer.

儘管如此，上訴法院現在仍然堅持這一裁決，認識到雙方提出的“實質性論點”，並表明將對該問題進行全面審查，並在夏季結束時進行決定。

The appeals court judges said the issue is "of the greatest importance" and will be speedily decided.

上訴法院法官說，這個問題是“最重要的”，並將迅速決定。

“We are not ruling on the merits of the case, but rather on the question of whether to stay the lower court’s ruling and the administrative action ordered by that court,” said the appeals court.

上訴法院說：“我們不是在案件的案情中裁定，而是關於是否要執行下級法院的裁決和該法院下令的行政訴訟的問題。”

“Having carefully considered the matter, we have determined to stay the lower court’s ruling and to expedite the administrative appeal.”

“仔細考慮此事後，我們決定遵守下級法院的裁決，並加快行政上訴。”

The ruling follows a petition by the Biden administration to halt the lower court ruling and allow the tariffs to continue in the meantime.

該裁決是在拜登政府提出的請願書，以阻止下級法院的裁決，並允許關稅繼續在此期間。

The appeals court approved that request.

上訴法院批准了該請求。

Announcing the decision, the appeals court said: “The president’s use of IEEPA to respond to a crisis at the southern border and the smuggling of fentanyl into the United States is a question of pressing national importance.”

上訴法院在宣布這一決定時說：“總統利用伊普（Ieepa）應對南部邊境的危機以及芬太尼走私到美國的危機，這是一個迫切的國家重要性的問題。”

The ruling adds another chapter in the ongoing legal battle over Trump’s trade policies, which have frequently shifted and sparked reactions from U.S. companies and global markets.

該裁決增加了關於特朗普的貿易政策正在進行的法律鬥爭中的另一章，這些政策經常轉移並引發了美國公司和全球市場的反應。

Earlier this year, a federal appeals court ruled that presidents do not have the authority to use wartime powers to seize a U.S. subsidiary of a British company in order to maintain a critical program for transporting nuclear material.

今年早些時候，聯邦上訴法院裁定，總統無權利用戰時權力奪取英國公司的美國子公司，以維持運輸核材料的關鍵計劃。