標題：著名律師和加密貨幣個性比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan

著名的律師和加密貨幣個性比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）概述了加密巨頭漣漪和美國證券交易委員會的下一個可能步驟

Prominent attorney and cryptocurrency personality Bill Morgan has outlined the next possible steps for crypto giant Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) after District Court Judge Analisa Torres rejected the proposed point of compromise between both parties.

在地方法院法官Analisa Torres拒絕了雙方之間提議的妥協點之後，著名的律師和加密貨幣人格比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）概述了加密巨頭波紋和美國證券交易委員會（SEC）的下一個可能步驟。

On May 16, Judge Torres denied the joint request from Ripple and the SEC because it was a procedure she considered improper. Torres added that the request was also not within her jurisdiction as the case is still under appeal. However, if it was, the Judge asserted that the motion would still be denied as it did not address Rule 60, which oversees the justification of relief requests from final judgments.

5月16日，托雷斯法官否認了Ripple和SEC的共同請求，因為這是她認為不當的程序。托雷斯補充說，由於案件仍在上訴，該請求也不在她的管轄範圍內。但是，如果是這樣，法官斷言該動議仍將被拒絕，因為它沒有解決第60條的規則，該規則監督了最終判決的救濟請求的正當理由。

While the court’s denial focused on the procedure and did not hint at any disapproval of the settlement, the procedural situation has now prolonged the case.

儘管法院的否認重點是該程序，但並未暗示對和解的任何不贊成，但程序狀況現在延長了案件。

However, attorney Bill Morgan maintains that the settlement agreement has not become useless; it remains in its entirety.

但是，律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）堅持認為，和解協議尚未變得毫無用處。它保持完整。

Possible case scenarios for Ripple and the U.S. SEC

Ripple和美國SEC的可能情況

The attorney added that should an indicative ruling be obtained from the Judge, both parties could file a motion to the Court of Appeals for a limited remand to seek relief agreed between Ripple and the SEC from Judge Analisa Torres.

律師補充說，如果應從法官那裡獲得指示性裁決，雙方都可以向上訴法院提出動議，以尋求有限押金尋求Ripple和SEC之間對Analisa Torres法官達成協議的救濟。

If the limited remand is granted, both parties could file a motion with the Judge seeking the relief they initially agreed upon.

如果有限的還押被授予，雙方都可以向法官提出動議，以尋求他們最初同意的救濟。

Bill Morgan further explained that with the dissolution of the injunction and the payment of the $125 million civil fine, now reduced to $50 million, both parties could file a motion with the Second Circuit Court to dismiss the Appeal and cross-appeal.

比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）進一步解釋說，隨著禁令解散和支付1.25億美元的民事罰款，現在降至5000萬美元，雙方都可以向第二巡迴法院提出動議，以駁回上訴和交叉上訴。

At this stage, another joint motion by both parties, which is considered “procedurally correct”, could be filed.

在此階段，雙方的另一個聯合運動可以被認為是“程序上正確的”。

Notably, the attorney conclusively acknowledged the recent remarks made by Stuart Alderoty, the Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, who is convinced that both Ripple and the U.S. regulator will work together in court while addressing the issues raised by the Judge.

值得注意的是，律師最終承認，Ripple的首席法律官Stuart Alderoty的最新言論，他堅信Ripple和美國監管機構將在法庭上共同解決法官提出的問題。