這是一個強烈而戰略性的信息

這是$ LUNC和$ USTC社區的強烈而戰略性的信息 - 表明從被動接受到主動管理的轉變

The $LUNC and $USTC communities have spoken, and their message is clear: strong, strategic, and united. After a period of passive acceptance, the community is now actively taking charge of the project’s future. This is especially evident in the recent rejection of the EUTC Repeg proposal for $USTC.

$ lunc和$ ustc社區已經講話了，他們的信息很明確：強大，戰略性和曼聯。經過一段時間的被動接受，社區現在正在積極負責該項目的未來。這在最近拒絕$ USTC的EUTC Repeg提案中尤其明顯。

Key Takeaways:

關鍵要點：

The community’s rejection of the EUTC Repeg proposal shouldn’t be viewed as negativity. Instead, it signals a shift towards discernment. The community wants what’s best for the project in the long run, and they’re not willing to settle for quick fixes that lack quality.

社區對EUTC責任提案的拒絕不應被視為消極情緒。取而代之的是，它標誌著朝向洞察力的轉變。從長遠來看，社區想要最適合該項目的東西，他們不願意為缺乏質量的快速修復而定。

Reducing the burn to 0.15% was met with backlash because it felt like a step back. The burn is a crucial part of what gave LUNC renewed life post-crash. Reducing it so drastically felt like undermining the very fabric of the project’s recovery.

將燃燒減少到0.15％的反彈遇到了反彈，因為感覺就像後退。燒傷是使折磨後新生生命的關鍵部分。如此大幅度地減少它的感覺就像破壞了項目恢復的結構。

Community members are engaging in discussions, demanding clarity, transparency, and smarter economic design—which is exactly what mature DeFi ecosystems thrive on.

社區成員正在進行討論，要求清晰，透明度和更智能的經濟設計，這正是成熟的Defi生態系統蓬勃發展。

Why This Matters for the Future:

為什麼這對未來很重要：

At this stage, LUNC is evolving beyond a meme or redemption arc. It’s becoming a community-governed asset with real on-chain utility potential.

在此階段，Lunc正在超越模因或救贖弧線。它已成為具有真正鏈效潛力的社區管理資產。

Pegging USTC without a solid burn and supply strategy is reckless; it’s a half-measure that risks everything. A Repeg needs to be approached with a holistic perspective, considering both the tokenomics and the community's consensus.

沒有牢固的燃燒，固定USTC和供應策略是魯ck的；這是一半的措施，冒著一切風險。考慮到令牌學和社區的共識，需要以整體的觀點來征服責任。

This moment sets a precedent: decisions must align with community consensus and the integrity of the tokenomics.

這一刻設定了一個先例：決策必須與社區共識和令牌學的完整性保持一致。

What’s Next?

接下來是什麼？

Expect to see a better Repeg strategy proposed—likely with clearer math, stronger burn logic, and more transparent governance to engage the community effectively.

期望看到提出的更好的償還策略 - 以清晰的數學，更強大的燃燒邏輯和更透明的治理，以有效地參與社區。

There will be a renewed momentum for development teams who are aligned with the community’s long-term vision for sustainable utility and DeFi models.

對於與社區對可持續公用事業和DEFI模型的長期願景保持一致的開發團隊的勢頭將有新的勢頭。

Keep an eye out for proposals that integrate sustainable DeFi models (e.g., treasury-backed pegs, auto-burn mechanisms) to foster a vibrant and lasting ecosystem.

請密切注意整合可持續發展模型的建議（例如，庫房支持的釘子，自動燃燒機制），以促進一個充滿活力且持久的生態系統。

The community is signaling a shift from passive acceptance to active stewardship over the project’s future. It will be interesting to see how the narrative unfolds from here.

社區表明，從被動接受到對項目未來的積極管理的轉變。看到敘事是如何從這裡展開的。

Would you like a simplified explainer or visual roadmap of how a “smart repeg strategy” could look for $USTC? I'm happy to help with that too!

您是否想要簡化的解釋器或視覺路線圖，即“智能償還策略”如何尋找$ USTC？我也很高興能為此提供幫助！