Market Cap: $3.2944T 1.380%
Volume(24h): $85.1867B -23.080%
  • Market Cap: $3.2944T 1.380%
  • Volume(24h): $85.1867B -23.080%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.2944T 1.380%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$105561.692885 USD

0.87%

ethereum
ethereum

$2513.968322 USD

1.23%

tether
tether

$1.000833 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.174793 USD

0.07%

bnb
bnb

$650.191287 USD

0.66%

solana
solana

$149.934483 USD

0.90%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.000010 USD

0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.183926 USD

1.47%

tron
tron

$0.286479 USD

2.94%

cardano
cardano

$0.659440 USD

0.10%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$34.785089 USD

3.71%

sui
sui

$3.248166 USD

-0.30%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.819809 USD

0.66%

avalanche
avalanche

$20.443074 USD

2.76%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.231492 USD

2.37%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

This is a strong and strategic message

May 08, 2025 at 10:20 am

This is a strong and strategic message from the $LUNC and $USTC communities — signaling a shift from passive acceptance to active stewardship

This is a strong and strategic message

The $LUNC and $USTC communities have spoken, and their message is clear: strong, strategic, and united. After a period of passive acceptance, the community is now actively taking charge of the project’s future. This is especially evident in the recent rejection of the EUTC Repeg proposal for $USTC.

Key Takeaways:

The community’s rejection of the EUTC Repeg proposal shouldn’t be viewed as negativity. Instead, it signals a shift towards discernment. The community wants what’s best for the project in the long run, and they’re not willing to settle for quick fixes that lack quality.

Reducing the burn to 0.15% was met with backlash because it felt like a step back. The burn is a crucial part of what gave LUNC renewed life post-crash. Reducing it so drastically felt like undermining the very fabric of the project’s recovery.

Community members are engaging in discussions, demanding clarity, transparency, and smarter economic design—which is exactly what mature DeFi ecosystems thrive on.

Why This Matters for the Future:

At this stage, LUNC is evolving beyond a meme or redemption arc. It’s becoming a community-governed asset with real on-chain utility potential.

Pegging USTC without a solid burn and supply strategy is reckless; it’s a half-measure that risks everything. A Repeg needs to be approached with a holistic perspective, considering both the tokenomics and the community's consensus.

This moment sets a precedent: decisions must align with community consensus and the integrity of the tokenomics.

What’s Next?

Expect to see a better Repeg strategy proposed—likely with clearer math, stronger burn logic, and more transparent governance to engage the community effectively.

There will be a renewed momentum for development teams who are aligned with the community’s long-term vision for sustainable utility and DeFi models.

Keep an eye out for proposals that integrate sustainable DeFi models (e.g., treasury-backed pegs, auto-burn mechanisms) to foster a vibrant and lasting ecosystem.

The community is signaling a shift from passive acceptance to active stewardship over the project’s future. It will be interesting to see how the narrative unfolds from here.

Would you like a simplified explainer or visual roadmap of how a “smart repeg strategy” could look for $USTC? I'm happy to help with that too!

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jun 08, 2025