Ripple與美國證券交易委員會（SEC）之間長期進行的法律鬥爭的地位

雖然此案之後的一些法律專家認為，可能需要幾個月的時間才能達成最終判決，但誤導性的主張和謠言繼續在社交媒體上傳播。

There's been a lot of chatter online lately about the status of the long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While some legal experts following the case closely believe it might take a few more months before a final verdict is reached, misleading claims and rumors continue to spread on social media.

最近，在網上有很多關於Ripple與美國證券交易委員會（SEC）之間長期進行法律鬥爭的地位的聊天。雖然此案之後的一些法律專家認為，可能需要幾個月的時間才能達成最終判決，但誤導性的主張和謠言繼續在社交媒體上傳播。

Recently, a user named Altcoin Bale posted on X, claiming that the case was already closed, banks were quietly buying XRP, and retail investors would soon be priced out. But this statement didn't sit well with pro-XRP attorney Bill Morgan, who has been actively tracking the lawsuit.

最近，一位名為Altcoin bale的用戶發佈在X上，聲稱該案已經關閉，銀行正在悄悄購買XRP，零售投資者很快就會被定價。但是，這一說法與親XRP的律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）相處不佳，後者一直在積極跟踪訴訟。

quickly responded, saying, "FFS the case is not closed, or did you miss the news last week about an unsuccessful motion for an indicative ruling and an Appeal and Cross-appeal in abeyance but not over."

迅速回答說：“ FFS案件沒有結束，或者您上週錯過了有關指示性裁決以及暫停中的上訴和交叉訴訟的新聞，但沒有結束。”

Another user replied to Bill, saying that the case had hit a procedural snag because both Ripple and the SEC submitted a dismissal request using the wrong form. According to them, this technical error led the judge to reject it.

另一位用戶回答比爾（Bill）說，此案遇到了程序障礙，因為Ripple和SEC都使用錯誤的表格提交了解僱請求。據他們說，這一技術錯誤使法官拒絕了它。

But former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel stepped in, clarifying that the situation was far more serious than just a simple paperwork issue. "That is not an accurate description at all. It’s a far bigger issue than that," he stated.

但是前SEC律師馬克·法格爾（Marc Fagel）介入了，澄清說，這種情況遠不僅僅是一個簡單的文書工作問題。他說：“這根本不是一個準確的描述。這遠不止於此。”

Expressing his frustration, Bill Morgan added, "The XRP community don't want to listen. They want to hear 'case closed, XRP to the moon.'"

比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）表示沮喪，他補充說：“ XRP社區不想听。

For the unversed, here's what actually happened: Judge Analisa Torres denied both parties' motions for an indicative ruling. In simpler terms, the judge stated that if the court's jurisdiction were restored, she would deny the motion as it was filed under the wrong procedural rule. This means Ripple and the SEC will likely have to refile the motion correctly, and possibly plead their case once again.

對於未經事件的情況，這是實際發生的事情：Analisa Torres法官否認雙方對指示性裁決的動議。法官說，如果恢復了法院的管轄權，她將否認該動議是根據錯誤的程序規則提出的。這意味著Ripple和SEC可能不得不正確地對該動作進行正確的撥號，並可能再次懇求他們的案子。

While XRP supporters are eagerly awaiting good news, it's clear from the legal experts' comments that the lawsuit is still ongoing — and there are a few more legal hurdles to clear before any final outcome.

儘管XRP支持者急切地等待好消息，但從法律專家的評論中可以明顯看出，該訴訟仍在進行中 - 在任何最終結果之前，還有更多的法律障礙要清除。