Ripple与美国证券交易委员会（SEC）之间长期进行的法律斗争的地位

虽然此案之后的一些法律专家认为，可能需要几个月的时间才能达成最终判决，但误导性的主张和谣言继续在社交媒体上传播。

There's been a lot of chatter online lately about the status of the long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While some legal experts following the case closely believe it might take a few more months before a final verdict is reached, misleading claims and rumors continue to spread on social media.

最近，在网上有很多关于Ripple与美国证券交易委员会（SEC）之间长期进行法律斗争的地位的聊天。虽然此案之后的一些法律专家认为，可能需要几个月的时间才能达成最终判决，但误导性的主张和谣言继续在社交媒体上传播。

Recently, a user named Altcoin Bale posted on X, claiming that the case was already closed, banks were quietly buying XRP, and retail investors would soon be priced out. But this statement didn't sit well with pro-XRP attorney Bill Morgan, who has been actively tracking the lawsuit.

最近，一位名为Altcoin bale的用户发布在X上，声称该案已经关闭，银行正在悄悄购买XRP，零售投资者很快就会被定价。但是，这一说法与亲XRP的律师比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）相处不佳，后者一直在积极跟踪诉讼。

quickly responded, saying, "FFS the case is not closed, or did you miss the news last week about an unsuccessful motion for an indicative ruling and an Appeal and Cross-appeal in abeyance but not over."

迅速回答说：“ FFS案件没有结束，或者您上周错过了有关指示性裁决以及暂停中的上诉和交叉诉讼的新闻，但没有结束。”

Another user replied to Bill, saying that the case had hit a procedural snag because both Ripple and the SEC submitted a dismissal request using the wrong form. According to them, this technical error led the judge to reject it.

另一位用户回答比尔（Bill）说，此案遇到了程序障碍，因为Ripple和SEC都使用错误的表格提交了解雇请求。据他们说，这一技术错误使法官拒绝了它。

But former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel stepped in, clarifying that the situation was far more serious than just a simple paperwork issue. "That is not an accurate description at all. It’s a far bigger issue than that," he stated.

但是前SEC律师马克·法格尔（Marc Fagel）介入了，澄清说，这种情况远不仅仅是一个简单的文书工作问题。他说：“这根本不是一个准确的描述。这远不止于此。”

Expressing his frustration, Bill Morgan added, "The XRP community don't want to listen. They want to hear 'case closed, XRP to the moon.'"

比尔·摩根（Bill Morgan）表示沮丧，他补充说：“ XRP社区不想听。

For the unversed, here's what actually happened: Judge Analisa Torres denied both parties' motions for an indicative ruling. In simpler terms, the judge stated that if the court's jurisdiction were restored, she would deny the motion as it was filed under the wrong procedural rule. This means Ripple and the SEC will likely have to refile the motion correctly, and possibly plead their case once again.

对于未经事件的情况，这是实际发生的事情：Analisa Torres法官否认双方对指示性裁决的动议。法官说，如果恢复了法院的管辖权，她将否认该动议是根据错误的程序规则提出的。这意味着Ripple和SEC可能不得不正确地对该动作进行正确的拨号，并可能再次恳求他们的案子。

While XRP supporters are eagerly awaiting good news, it's clear from the legal experts' comments that the lawsuit is still ongoing — and there are a few more legal hurdles to clear before any final outcome.

尽管XRP支持者急切地等待好消息，但从法律专家的评论中可以明显看出，该诉讼仍在进行中 - 在任何最终结果之前，还有更多的法律障碍要清除。