參議員魯米斯譴責司法部對加密錢包的“限制性立場”

美國參議員辛西婭·盧米斯批評司法部對非託管加密貨幣錢包的「限制性」做法，認為這違反了財政部的指導方針，並破壞了加密貨幣的去中心化性質。這一立場源於最近司法部檢察官根據貨幣傳輸法對軟體開發人員提出刑事指控的案件，引發了加密社區的強烈反對以及對侵犯與數位資產相關的基本權利和自由的擔憂。

United States Senator Lummis Condemns Department of Justice's Stance on Cryptocurrency Wallets

美國參議員盧米斯譴責司法部對加密貨幣錢包的立場

Washington, D.C. - United States Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) has vehemently denounced the United States Department of Justice's (DOJ) restrictive stance on non-custodial cryptocurrency software, a position she contends contradicts Treasury guidance and undermines the decentralized nature of digital currencies.

華盛頓特區- 美國參議員Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) 強烈譴責美國司法部(DOJ) 對非託管加密貨幣軟體的限制立場，她認為這一立場與財政部的指導相矛盾，並破壞了數位貨幣的去中心化性質。

Senator Lummis's criticism stems from recent cases where the DOJ has pursued criminal charges against software developers responsible for non-custodial wallets, which confer full control over private keys and assets to their users, fostering decentralization and financial autonomy.

盧米斯參議員的批評源於最近司法部對負責非託管錢包的軟體開發商提起刑事指控的案件，這些錢包將私鑰和資產的完全控制權授予用戶，從而促進權力下放和財務自主。

In a staunchly worded statement, Senator Lummis expressed profound concern over the Biden administration's prosecution of "core tenants of the Bitcoin network and decentralized finance," emphasizing that such actions imperil the fundamental principles of ownership and freedom inherent to cryptocurrencies.

在一份措辭堅定的聲明中，參議員魯米斯對拜登政府起訴「比特幣網路和去中心化金融的核心租戶」表示深切關注，強調此類行為危及加密貨幣固有的所有權和自由的基本原則。

"This restrictive approach from the DOJ threatens the very essence of cryptocurrencies," Lummis asserted. "I will fight for the people's right to hold their own keys and run their own nodes."

Lummis 斷言：“司法部的這種限制性做法威脅到了加密貨幣的本質。” “我將為人們持有自己的密鑰並運行自己的節點的權利而奮鬥。”

The Senator's opposition finds resonance within the cryptocurrency community, where the DOJ's interpretation of money transmission laws has sparked backlash. The law, as applied by the DOJ, extends to wallet developers who lack direct control over user assets, a position that cryptocurrency advocacy group Coin Center contends contradicts existing guidance and decisions from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

參議員的反對在加密貨幣社區中引起了共鳴，司法部對貨幣傳輸法的解釋引發了強烈反對。美國司法部適用的這項法律適用於缺乏對用戶資產直接控制的錢包開發商，加密貨幣倡導組織 Coin Center 認為這一立場與金融犯罪執法網絡 (FinCEN) 的現有指導和決定相矛盾。

"Every functional cryptocurrency wallet and smart contract would be considered money transmitters under the DOJ's interpretation," argued Coin Center research director Peter Van Valkenburgh, "and every developer engaged in unlicensed money transmission."

硬幣中心研究總監 Peter Van Valkenburgh 表示：“根據司法部的解釋，每個功能性的加密貨幣錢包和智能合約都將被視為貨幣傳輸者，並且每個開發商都參與未經許可的貨幣傳輸。”

In a further display of opposition, Coin Center has filed an amicus brief in defense of Roman Storm, a developer charged in connection with Tornado Cash, an open-source privacy tool. The brief asserts that the publication of Tornado Cash's code is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment.

為了進一步表示反對，Coin Center 提交了一份非當事人意見陳述，為 Roman Storm 辯護，Roman Storm 是一名被指控與開源隱私工具 Tornado Cash 有關的開發人員。該簡報聲稱，Tornado Cash 代碼的發布受到憲法第一修正案的保護。

The controversy surrounding the DOJ's actions reflects a broader debate over appropriate regulatory oversight in the realm of digital assets and blockchain technologies. Senator Lummis has consistently advocated for flexible regulations that foster innovation and decentralization, while others contend that a restrictive approach is necessary to safeguard financial integrity and prevent illicit activities.

圍繞司法部行為的爭議反映了對數位資產和區塊鏈技術領域適當監管監督的更廣泛辯論。盧米斯參議員一貫主張採取靈活的監管措施，以促進創新和權力下放，而其他人則認為，有必要採取限制性措施來維護金融誠信和防止非法活動。

The DOJ's pursuit of criminal charges against software developers for non-custodial wallets has reignited these debates, prompting questions about the government's role in regulating rapidly evolving financial technologies. Critics argue that the DOJ's actions could stifle innovation and hinder the adoption of cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance, potentially depriving individuals of the benefits and freedoms these technologies offer.

美國司法部對非託管錢包軟體開發商提起刑事指控，重新引發了這些爭論，引發了人們對政府在監管快速發展的金融技術方面的作用的質疑。批評者認為，司法部的行動可能會扼殺創新並阻礙​​加密貨幣和去中心化金融的採用，可能會剝奪個人這些技術提供的好處和自由。

As the regulatory landscape for digital assets continues to evolve, Senator Lummis's criticism of the DOJ's stance underscores the need for thoughtful and balanced approaches that prioritize innovation, financial integrity, and individual liberty. The ongoing debate promises to shape the future of cryptocurrencies and the role of government in overseeing this transformative technology.

隨著數位資產監管環境的不斷發展，參議員魯米斯對司法部立場的批評強調需要採取深思熟慮和平衡的方法，優先考慮創新、金融誠信和個人自由。正在進行的辯論有望塑造加密貨幣的未來以及政府在監督這項變革性技術方面的作用。