波紋和SEC再次在XRP訴訟中提出聯合動議

在XRP訴訟的最新發展中，Ripple和SEC再次向法院提出了聯合動議，尋求一項指示性裁決，以驗證和解協議。

In a significant development in the ongoing XRP lawsuit, Ripple and the SEC have again filed a joint motion with the court, seeking an "indicative ruling" to validate the settlement agreement reached between the parties.

在正在進行的XRP訴訟的重大發展中，Ripple和SEC再次向法院提出了聯合動議，尋求“指示性裁決”以驗證雙方之間達成的和解協議。

The parties have asked that the judge dissolve the injunction and order the release of the monetary judgment in the case, according to the SEC filing on Friday.

根據美國證券交易委員會（SEC）的提交，當事各方要求法官解散禁令並下令在該案中釋放貨幣判決。

Both parties request Manhattan District Court Judge Analisa Torres to dissolve the injunction in their long-running legal battle and also release the $125 million civil penalty against Ripple from escrow, as stated in a post by journalist Eleanor Terrett on X.

雙方要求曼哈頓地方法院法官Analisa Torres在其長期進行的法律鬥爭中解散禁令，並釋放託管對Ripple的1.25億美元民事罰款，如X上的記者Eleanor Terrett所述。

As part of the settlement agreement, both parties propose that the SEC receives $50 million out of the sum, while the remaining returns to Ripple. This comes as both parties look to finally resolve this and end the ongoing appeal and cross-appeal cases.

作為和解協議的一部分，雙方都建議SEC收到5,000萬美元，而其餘的回報均回到波紋。這是因為雙方都希望最終解決這一問題，並結束持續的吸引力和交叉訴訟。

As CoinGape reported, both parties were facing a crucial deadline on June 16, which is when the SEC would have had to file a status report on the motion it had earlier filed in the District Court. However, with this move, they could seek an extension as they look to resolve the case rather than proceeding with the appeal.

正如Coingape報導的那樣，雙方在6月16日面臨關鍵的截止日期，這是SEC將不得不就早些時候在地方法院提出的動議提交身份報告的時候。但是，通過此舉，他們可以尋求擴展，因為他們希望解決此案，而不是進行上訴。

According to the filing, Ripple and the SEC argue ‘exceptional circumstances’ as to why the motion should be granted. These circumstances include the settlement, the SEC's shift in crypto policy, and the desire to avoid further litigation.

根據文件，Ripple和SEC關於為什麼應批准該動議的“特殊情況”。這些情況包括解決方案，SEC對加密政策的轉變以及避免進一步訴訟的願望。

In her May decision, where she denied the earlier motion for an indicative ruling, Judge Torres had stated that the court only grants relief from judgment under the Deferal Rule of Civil Procedure “only upon showing of exceptional circumstances.”

托雷斯法官在她的5月決定中否認了提出指示性裁決的早期動議，並指出，法院只在民事訴訟統治下“僅在表現出特殊情況下”就可以從判決中釋放判決。

This explains why both parties have gone on to highlight the exceptional circumstances that exist in the XRP lawsuit. However, it remains to be seen if Judge Torres would grant the request for an indicative ruling this time around.

這解釋了為什麼雙方都繼續強調XRP訴訟中存在的特殊情況。但是，托雷斯法官這次是否會要求提出指示性裁決，還有待觀察。