波纹和SEC再次在XRP诉讼中提出联合动议

在XRP诉讼的最新发展中，Ripple和SEC再次向法院提出了联合动议，寻求一项指示性裁决，以验证和解协议。

In a significant development in the ongoing XRP lawsuit, Ripple and the SEC have again filed a joint motion with the court, seeking an "indicative ruling" to validate the settlement agreement reached between the parties.

在正在进行的XRP诉讼的重大发展中，Ripple和SEC再次向法院提出了联合动议，寻求“指示性裁决”以验证双方之间达成的和解协议。

The parties have asked that the judge dissolve the injunction and order the release of the monetary judgment in the case, according to the SEC filing on Friday.

根据美国证券交易委员会（SEC）的提交，当事各方要求法官解散禁令并下令在该案中释放货币判决。

Both parties request Manhattan District Court Judge Analisa Torres to dissolve the injunction in their long-running legal battle and also release the $125 million civil penalty against Ripple from escrow, as stated in a post by journalist Eleanor Terrett on X.

双方要求曼哈顿地方法院法官Analisa Torres在其长期进行的法律斗争中解散禁令，并释放托管对Ripple的1.25亿美元民事罚款，如X上的记者Eleanor Terrett所述。

As part of the settlement agreement, both parties propose that the SEC receives $50 million out of the sum, while the remaining returns to Ripple. This comes as both parties look to finally resolve this and end the ongoing appeal and cross-appeal cases.

作为和解协议的一部分，双方都建议SEC收到5,000万美元，而其余的回报均回到波纹。这是因为双方都希望最终解决这一问题，并结束持续的吸引力和交叉诉讼。

As CoinGape reported, both parties were facing a crucial deadline on June 16, which is when the SEC would have had to file a status report on the motion it had earlier filed in the District Court. However, with this move, they could seek an extension as they look to resolve the case rather than proceeding with the appeal.

正如Coingape报道的那样，双方在6月16日面临关键的截止日期，这是SEC将不得不就早些时候在地方法院提出的动议提交身份报告的时候。但是，通过此举，他们可以寻求扩展，因为他们希望解决此案，而不是进行上诉。

According to the filing, Ripple and the SEC argue ‘exceptional circumstances’ as to why the motion should be granted. These circumstances include the settlement, the SEC's shift in crypto policy, and the desire to avoid further litigation.

根据文件，Ripple和SEC关于为什么应批准该动议的“特殊情况”。这些情况包括解决方案，SEC对加密政策的转变以及避免进一步诉讼的愿望。

In her May decision, where she denied the earlier motion for an indicative ruling, Judge Torres had stated that the court only grants relief from judgment under the Deferal Rule of Civil Procedure “only upon showing of exceptional circumstances.”

托雷斯法官在她的5月决定中否认了提出指示性裁决的早期动议，并指出，法院只在民事诉讼统治下“仅在表现出特殊情况下”就可以从判决中释放判决。

This explains why both parties have gone on to highlight the exceptional circumstances that exist in the XRP lawsuit. However, it remains to be seen if Judge Torres would grant the request for an indicative ruling this time around.

这解释了为什么双方都继续强调XRP诉讼中存在的特殊情况。但是，托雷斯法官这次是否会要求提出指示性裁决，还有待观察。