![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
在法院判決與技術一樣影響軌蹟的生態系統中,本週發布的一項裁決削弱了成千上萬的比特幣SV(BSV)投資者的希望。
An ecosystem where court decisions appear to factor into crypto trajectories as much as technologies, the UK Court of Appeal has partially dismissed a class action lawsuit against Binance and several other exchanges.
英國上訴法院的一個生態系統似乎將法院判決與技術構成一樣多的加密軌跡,部分駁回了針對Binance和其他幾次交易所的集體訴訟。
The ruling, issued on Tuesday, May 21, puts at least a temporary halt to a legal process that began five years ago with the aim of obtaining 8.9 billion pounds sterling (about 11.9 billion dollars) in compensation from Binance, Kraken, ShapeShift, and Bittylicious for the delisting of Bitcoin SV (BSV).
該裁決於5月21日星期二發布,至少暫時停止了五年前的法律程序,其目的是從Binance,Kraken,Shapeshift,Shapeshift和Bittylicalious獲得89億英鎊的Sterling(約119億美元),以使比特幣SV(BSV(BSV)善意。
The plaintiffs, a group of BSV investors, were targeting the platforms for allegedly causing major financial damage by delisting the crypto in April 2019. Their claims, however, have been rejected by the Court of Appeal, which spotted several flaws in the legal arguments presented.
原告是一群BSV投資者,目的是針對該平台,目的是涉嫌通過在2019年4月授予加密貨幣造成重大財務損失。但是,上訴法院拒絕了他們的主張,該法院在提出的法律論點中發現了幾個缺陷。
The essence of the decision lies in the fact that plaintiffs could not claim compensation based on a speculative projection of future Bitcoin SV performance. As the judges noted, legal tools are not meant to guarantee hypothetical profits in such an uncertain market.
該決定的本質在於這樣一個事實,即原告無法基於對未來比特幣SV績效的投機性預測的賠償。正如法官指出的那樣,法律工具並不是要保證在如此不確定的市場中的假設利潤。
The lower court had erred in including such a claim in its decision.
下級法院在其裁決中犯了這一主張。
Another crucial point in the case concerned the legal notion of “loss of chance”, i.e., the theoretical possibility of benefiting from future gains. Thus, plaintiffs argued that by delisting BSV, platforms caused them to lose a financial opportunity.
該案中的另一個關鍵點是關於“失去機會喪失”的法律概念,即從未來收益中受益的理論可能性。因此,原告辯稱,通過將BSV推薦,平台使他們失去了財務機會。
This approach was “fundamentally flawed in principle”, stated the Court of Appeal, adding that “cryptos are, by nature, volatile investments”.
上訴法院說,這種方法“從根本上是有缺陷的”,並補充說:“從本質上講,加密貨幣是動蕩的投資”。
The Court also noted that even if some investors were not immediately aware of the BSV delisting, their legal recourse was strictly limited. At best, they could claim compensation equal to the value of their initial investment before delisting, plus direct and quantifiable losses, but certainly not hypothetical unrealized profits.
法院還指出,即使某些投資者沒有立即意識到BSV的推薦,他們的法律追索也受到嚴格限制。充其量,他們可以要求賠償等於其在脫穎而出之前的初始投資價值,再加上可量化的損失,但肯定不是假設的未實現的利潤。
This distinction introduces potentially structuring case law. Jurisdictions could now consider that speculation on the future performance of a crypto asset does not constitute legally reparable harm.
這種區別引入了潛在的結構判例法。司法管轄區現在可以考慮,對加密資產的未來績效的猜測並不構成合法賠償的危害。
This decision could have consequences far beyond the BSV case. By invalidating the speculative basis of the complaint, British justice reinforces the principle of individual investor responsibility when faced with factors amplifying falls in the case of crypto market volatility. It could also serve as a reference in other ongoing disputes, notably those opposing exchanges to users harmed by delistings or perceived manipulations.
該決定可能會產生遠遠超出BSV案件的後果。通過使投訴的投機基礎無效,英國司法在面對加密市場波動的情況下面臨放大因素時的責任原則。它也可以作為其他持續爭議的參考,尤其是那些與因脫穎而出或感知的操縱傷害的用戶進行的交流。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 加密貨幣,山寨幣和利潤潛力:導航野外西部
- 2025-08-04 14:00:51
- 探索加密貨幣和山寨幣的動盪世界,發現利潤潛力並導航市場趨勢。
-
- 藍金和加密:投資貴金屬的破壞
- 2025-08-04 13:55:45
- 探索Blue Gold的象徵性黃金和瑞士黃金對穩定幣的接受是如何破壞貴金屬投資的。
-
-
-
-
- 加密貨幣,戰略選擇,高回報:導航模因硬幣躁狂症
- 2025-08-04 13:45:23
- 模因硬幣在2025年翻轉加密貨幣敘事。戰略選擇和高回報?潛在潛在的收益中,潛入Moonbull,Little Pepe等。
-
-
- Solana vs.基礎:令牌發行拋出
- 2025-08-04 13:32:50
- 得益於Zora之類的平台,Base在代幣發行遊戲中的索拉納高跟鞋都在刺穿。但是Solana並沒有降低計數!讓我們打破這場除決。
-