Mantra創始人兼首席執行官John Patrick Mullin燃燒了自己的OM令牌的1.5億個，以贏得用戶信任

Mantra創始人兼首席執行官約翰·帕特里克·穆林（John Patrick Mullin）正在努力努力嘗試贏得Mantra社區的信仰和信心，因為OM令牌突然下降了91.7％

Mantra founder and CEO John Patrick Mullin is working hard to try and win back the faith and confidence of the Mantra community after the OM tokens suddenly dropped 91.7% in a single day on April 13. On that day the token dropped from $6.31 to $0.52, erasing $5.63 billion in value.

Mantra創始人兼首席執行官John Patrick Mullin正在努力嘗試贏得Mantra社區的信仰和信心，此前OM令牌在4月13日的一天中突然下降了91.7％。當天，該代幣從6.31美元下降到0.52美元，從價值刪除56.3億美元。

Given the ferocity and scale of the drop, many OM holders feared that Mullin and the team at Mantra, a layer 1 for real world assets, had engaged in a fraudulent scheme known as a “rug pull,” where major holders sell their tokens onto innocent retail investors, tanking the price. Mullin denies this allegation.

鑑於跌落的兇猛性和規模，許多OM持有人擔心Mantra的Mullin和團隊是現實世界資產的第1層，他們從事了一種欺詐性計劃，稱為“地毯拉力”，主要持有人將其代幣賣給無辜的零售投資者，從而使價格下跌。穆林否認了這一指控。

His latest olive branch to the aggrieved community is to burn 150 million of his own tokens, meaning that they will be permanently taken out of circulation by being sent to an irretrievable address on the Mantra blockchain.

他對受害社區的最新橄欖分支是要燃燒自己的1.5億個代幣，這意味著它們將被送往咒語區塊鏈上的令人難以挽回的地址，從而永久退出流通。

At today’s price of $0.53, these tokens are worth $79.5 million and, according to his own statements today on a Proof-of-Talk X Spaces hosted by veteran journalist Michael del Castillo of Media Luna, account for 99.5% of his total OM holdings. In the interview he said that he only has about 800,000 tokens remaining.

這些代幣今天的價格為0.53美元，價值7,950萬美元，根據他自己的陳述，今天在由媒體Luna的資深記者Michael Castillo主持的談話證明X空間上，佔其OM總持有量的99.5％。他在採訪中說，他只剩下約80萬個令牌。

Could he try to get these tokens back one day in the future?

他可以嘗試將來有一天將這些代幣恢復原狀嗎？

This used to be a preposterous question. But not anymore.

這曾經是一個荒謬的問題。但不再了。

The Breaking of a Crypto Taboo

加密禁忌的破壞

Token burns have become commonplace in crypto over the years. Best compared to a share buyback program, they are a simple way to reduce the float or supply of a token to appreciate its price.

多年來，令牌燃燒在加密貨幣中已變得司空見慣。與股票回購計劃相比，它們是減少浮動或供應代幣以欣賞其價格的簡單方法。

Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange by trading volume, has an automatic burning process in which it takes a percentage of profits, buys a corresponding portion of its native token BNB on the open market, and then sends it to a burn address. In total the company has burned 259,852.74 units of BNB worth $158 million.

Binance是世界上最大的加密貨幣交易所，具有自動燃燒過程，其中佔用一定比例的利潤，在公開市場上購買了其原始令牌BNB的相應部分，然後將其發送到燒傷地址。該公司總共燒毀了259,852.74輛BNB，價值1.58億美元。

In September 2021, the Ethereum network started a burning program with EIP-1559, in which fees paid by users to the network would be burned instead of being given to validators. During times of high usage the amount burned, which totals 5,230,717 ETH worth over $8.9 billion, outstrips rewards paid to stakers and makes the network deflationary.

2021年9月，以太坊網絡啟動了EIP-1559的燃燒計劃，其中用戶向網絡支付的費用將被燒毀，而不是將其交給驗證者。在使用高度燃燒的數額中，總計5,230,717 ETH的數量價值超過89億美元，超過了支付給Stakers的獎勵，並使網絡放氣。

This is how burns are supposed to work. But the world of token burns changed on March 17.

這就是伯恩斯應該如何工作的方式。但是像徵性伯恩斯的世界在3月17日發生了變化。

On that day, the team behind the crypto exchange Crypto.com overruled the wishes of its own community of CRO holders, the native token behind its Cronos blockchain, in the governance voting process to re-mint 70 billion tokens that it burned in 2021, seen then as a way to boost the price. One large CRO token holder, who spoke to Unchained on the condition of anonymity, said at the time, “they created a precedent that other projects could follow.”

那天，加密交易所Crypto.com背後的團隊否決了其自己的Cro持有者社區的願望，即Cronos區塊鏈背後的本地令牌，在治理投票過程中，重新蒙受了700億個令牌，當時它在2021年被燃燒，當時被視為價格提高價格。當時在匿名狀態下與Unchained交談的一位大型CRO代幣持有人說：“他們創建了一個可以遵循其他項目的先例。”

Read more: Crypto.com Forces Through Controversial Vote to Re-Mint 70 Billion CRO

閱讀更多：crypto.com通過有爭議的投票重新磨損700億克羅

Mullin Disavows His Tokens for Good

穆林永遠拒絕他的令牌

This precedent creates complications for any future token burn, especially when it comes to projects with questionable levels of decentralization, like Cronos and CRO, who had the voting power to pass its proposal against the wishes of virtually every other significant CRO holder. There are reports that over 90% of the total OM supply has been under control of the founding team, which could translate to outsized voting power on a proposal such as reissuing tokens, something that the Mantra team disputes.

這種先例會給任何未來的代幣燃燒帶來並發症，尤其是在具有可疑的權力下放的項目中，例如Cronos和Cro，他們具有投票權，可以通過幾乎所有其他重要的CRO持有人的意願通過其提議。有報導稱，OM供應總額的90％以上一直受到創始團隊的控制，這可以轉化為重新發行令牌等提案的大型投票權，這是Mantra團隊質疑的。

Del Castillo asked Mullin during their conversation whether he or the Mantra team (which is burning another 150 million OM tokens) would ever try to recover, or reissue, these tokens. An understandable question given the precedent set by Crypto.com and the fact that he just forfeited 99.5% of his OM net worth.

德爾·卡斯蒂略（Del Castillo）在談話中問穆林（Mullin）是否會試圖恢復或重新發行這些令牌。鑑於Crypto.com設定的先例，這是一個可以理解的問題，以及他只沒收了99.5％的OM淨資產的事實。

Mullin first answered by walking del Castillo through the proposal and governance process necessary for such an event to take place, saying that validators across the blockchain would have to approve such a step, but he concluded by saying, “I would not be supportive of something like this.”

穆林首先回答了德爾·卡斯蒂略（Del Castillo）進行此類活動所需的提案和治理過程，並說整個區塊鏈的驗證者必須批准這樣的步驟，但他總結說：“我不會支持這樣的事情。”

At this point there is no reason not to take Mullin at his word, who seemed earnest in the conversation. And he understands his significant personal stake in revitalizing Mantra after a historical crash, even for crypto standards.

在這一點上，沒有理由不願意穆林的話，他在談話中似乎很認真。而且，他了解自己在歷史崩潰後振興咒語方面的重要個人股份，即使是出於加密標準。

“Fundamentally, right now I’m being compared to some of the worst people in the space that have come before me,” said Mullin. “I have every incentive in the world in my personal opinion to make sure that I don’t go down as the likes of some of these other guys. I won’t name their names because

穆林說：“從根本上說，現在我正在將我與我面前的一些最糟糕的人進行比較。” “我個人認為我在世界上有任何動力，以確保我不會像其他一些人一樣跌倒。我不會命名他們的名字，因為