哈林NFT項目的創始人喬納森·米爾斯（Jonathan Mills）被投資者起訴數百萬美元

一群投資者已針對喬納森·米爾斯（Jonathan Mills）提起訴訟，指控他挪用了數百萬美元，通過NFT銷售和連接的比特幣礦業公司提起訴訟。

A group of investors has banded together to sue Jonathan Mills, the founder of the Hashling NFT project, for allegedly misappropriating millions of dollars raised through NFT sales and a Bitcoin mining venture.

一群投資者團結起來，蘇·喬納森·米爾斯（Sue Jonathan Mills）是哈林NFT項目的創始人，據稱盜用了通過NFT銷售和比特幣礦業公司籌集的數百萬美元。

The lawsuit, filed in Illinois on May 14 and seen by Blockworks, follows a report by The Block on the project’s collapse earlier this year.

該訴訟於5月14日在伊利諾伊州提起，並由Blockworks看到，遵循該公司今年早些時候該項目倒閉的報告。

According to legal documents, the case centers around claims that Mills transferred at least $3 million in assets to Satoshi Labs LLC—a company he leads—without delivering promised equity returns to other investors in the project.

根據法律文件，該案件圍繞聲稱，米爾斯將至少300萬美元的資產轉移給了他領導的一家公司的Satoshi Labs LLC，而該公司沒有向該項目的其他投資者提供承諾的股權回報。

Investors say they sold two Hashling NFT collections on Solana and Bitcoin, raising over $1.4 million for the project. The funds were meant to be used for mining equipment and other operating expenses, with investors receiving a portion of the project’s profits.

投資者表示，他們出售了有關Solana和Bitcoin的兩個Hashling NFT系列，為該項目籌集了超過140萬美元。這些資金原本用於採礦設備和其他運營費用，投資者獲得了項目的一部分利潤。

However, the plaintiffs claim they received no earnings and were eventually blocked from communicating with Mills and the project team.

但是，原告聲稱他們沒有獲得任何收入，並最終被阻止與米爾斯和項目團隊溝通。

The plaintiffs accuse Mills of fabricating a flawed shareholder agreement to justify his control of the assets. The document awarded Mills a 67% ownership stake and voting rights, while other investors were granted just 2% equity for contributions of up to $20,000.

原告指責工廠製造有缺陷的股東協議，以證明他對資產的控制是合理的。該文件向米爾斯授予了67％的所有權股份和投票權，而其他投資者僅獲得了2％的股權，最高可達20,000美元。

The name change from Proof of Work Labs to Satoshi Labs was, according to the lawsuit, used to obscure asset control while falsely assuring partners their equity would remain intact.

根據訴訟，該名稱從工作證明實驗室變為Satoshi Labs是用來模糊資產控制的，而錯誤地向合作夥伴保證其權益將保持完整狀態。

Mills had no experience with NFTs and initially pitched the project to one of the plaintiffs, who brought in collaborators for art, marketing, and event representation. Among those who invested was Mills’ girlfriend, the complaint claims.

米爾斯（Mills）在NFTS沒有經驗，最初將該項目推向了一位原告，後者帶來了藝術，市場營銷和活動代表的合作者。投訴稱，投資的人是米爾斯的女友。

The group is now seeking full restitution and a constructive trust over the project’s assets. They claim Mills’s actions amount to fraud and a breach of fiduciary duty.

該集團現在正在尋求對項目資產的完全恢復原狀和建設性的信任。他們聲稱米爾斯的行動等於欺詐和違反信託義務。

“The team worked well together at first, and they made significant contributions to the project's success,” said the plaintiffs’ attorney, Clinton Ind of Ind Law.

原告的律師，克林頓印第安納州法律的克林頓（Ind Law）說：“該團隊起初共同努力，他們為該項目的成功做出了重大貢獻。”

“However, Jonathan's actions later betrayed their trust and financial contributions. This lawsuit seeks to hold him accountable for his actions and ensure that the investors receive the compensation and recognition they deserve.”

“但是，喬納森的行動後來背叛了他們的信任和財務捐款。該訴訟旨在使他對自己的行為負責，並確保投資者獲得應有的賠償和認可。”

The case is A. B. C., et al. v. Jonathan Mills, et al., no 23-03853, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, (Illinois).

該案是ABC等。訴喬納森·米爾斯（Jonathan Mills）等人，第23-03853號，在庫克縣巡迴法院（伊利諾伊州）。