哈林NFT項目創始人喬納森·米爾斯（Jonathan Mills）被指控盜用數百萬美元的利潤

非殺菌令牌（NFT）項目Hashling NFT的幾位投資者指責其創始人從該項目中挪用了數百萬美元的利潤和緊密綁定的比特幣採礦業務。

Several investors in a non-fungible token (NFT) project, Hashling NFT, and a closely tied Bitcoin mining operation have accused the project’s founder of misappropriating millions of dollars in profits.

一個不可殺死的代幣（NFT）項目，Hashling NFT和緊密綁定的比特幣礦業運營的幾位投資者指責該項目的創始人挪用了數百萬美元的利潤。

According to a May 14 court filing in Illinois, the plaintiffs allege that their former business partner, Jonathan Mills, lied about transferring assets from Hashling NFT and at least $3 million from the Bitcoin mining project to a holding company — Satoshi Labs LLC (formerly known as Proof of Work Labs LLC), which Mills is the founder and CEO of.

根據5月14日在伊利諾伊州提交的法庭文件，原告聲稱，他們的前商業夥伴喬納森·米爾斯（Jonathan Mills）撒謊，撒謊，將資產從Hashling NFT轉移到Hashling NFT，並將至少300萬美元從比特幣礦業項目轉移到一家控股公司 - Satoshi Labs LLC（以前稱為Work Labs LLC的證明），這是Mills，這是Mills，這是該公司的首席執行官和首席執行官。

The plaintiffs have sued Mills for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, claiming that they have not received any of the equity returns that he supposedly promised for their investments in the project. They also claim to have raised a combined $1.46 million from two NFT drops on the Solana and Bitcoin blockchains.

原告已起訴工廠欺詐和違反信託義務，聲稱他們尚未收到他據說他承諾要投資該項目的任何股權回報。他們還聲稱從Solana和Bitcoin區塊鏈上的兩個NFT下降了146萬美元。

Mills allegedly began ghosting them shortly afterward, according to the plaintiffs, who add that he created a flawed shareholder agreement to falsely support his claim that the holding company controlled the project’s assets. This was “rife with errors” to support his lie, the plaintiffs said.

據原告稱，據稱米爾斯不久之後就開始欺騙他們，他們補充說，他建立了一項有缺陷的股東協議，以錯誤地支持他關於控股公司控制該項目資產的說法。原告說，這是“氾濫成災”來支持他的謊言。

According to the supposedly flawed shareholder agreement, Mills was to receive a 67% equity share in Proof of Work Labs (before he later renamed it to Satoshi Labs) while several other investors contributed up to $20,000 into the company in exchange for just 2% equity. He allegedly assured them that their equity stakes would remain unchanged despite the name change.

根據據稱有缺陷的股東協議，米爾斯將在工作證明實驗室獲得67％的股權份額（隨後他將其重命名為Satoshi Labs），而其他幾位投資者向公司捐款了高達20,000美元，以換取僅2％的股權。據稱，他向他們保證，儘管名稱更改，但他們的股權仍保持不變。

Mills also held a 67% voting share on all matters related to Proof of Work Labs (at the time) while no other partner held more than 2%.

米爾斯還對與工作證明實驗室相關的所有事項（當時）持有67％的投票股，而沒有其他合作夥伴則持有超過2％的股份。

Cointelegraph reached out to Mills but didn’t receive an immediate response.

Cointelegraph與米爾斯聯繫，但沒有立即得到回應。

Mills supposedly didn’t know much about NFTs

據說米爾斯對NFT不太了解

The Hashling NFT project was born from a different idea that Mills had initially discussed with one of the plaintiffs, Dustin Steerman, who initially established rapport with Mills from earlier collaborations. They followed through with the Hashling NFT project despite Mills initially telling Steerman that he had no money and no NFT-related experience to contribute to the project.

Hashling NFT項目源於米爾斯最初與原告之一達斯汀·斯特曼（Dustin Steerman）討論的不同想法，他最初與早期合作的米爾斯建立了融洽的關係。儘管米爾斯最初告訴Steerman他沒有錢，也沒有與NFT相關的經驗可以為該項目做出貢獻，但他們跟隨Hashling NFT項目。

“[Mills] had a willingness to help push the project forward, and he did have an idea at the start,” the investor’s attorney, Clinton Ind of Ind Legal Group LLC told Law360.

投資者的律師Ind Legal Group LLC的克林頓IND告訴Law360：“ [米爾斯]願意幫助推動該項目的前進，他確實有了一個想法。”

To ensure the Hashling NFT project’s success, Mills and Steerman recruited other investors, now also plaintiffs, to assist with everything from the NFT art and social media marketing to even attending NFT conferences in New York. Mills even got his girlfriend to invest in the Hashling NFTs project, the plaintiffs claimed.

為了確保Hashling NFT項目的成功，Mills和Steerman招募了其他現在原告的投資者，以協助NFT藝術和社交媒體營銷到參加紐約NFT會議的所有事物。原告聲稱，米爾斯甚至讓他的女友投資於Hashling NFTS項目。

In addition to the fraud and breach of fiduciary actions, the plaintiffs also requested a constructive trust over the project’s assets and full legal restitution.

除了欺詐和違反信託行動外，原告還要求對項目的資產和完全賠償的建設性信任。