哈林NFT项目创始人乔纳森·米尔斯（Jonathan Mills）被指控盗用数百万美元的利润

非杀菌令牌（NFT）项目Hashling NFT的几位投资者指责其创始人从该项目中挪用了数百万美元的利润和紧密绑定的比特币采矿业务。

Several investors in a non-fungible token (NFT) project, Hashling NFT, and a closely tied Bitcoin mining operation have accused the project’s founder of misappropriating millions of dollars in profits.

一个不可杀死的代币（NFT）项目，Hashling NFT和紧密绑定的比特币矿业运营的几位投资者指责该项目的创始人挪用了数百万美元的利润。

According to a May 14 court filing in Illinois, the plaintiffs allege that their former business partner, Jonathan Mills, lied about transferring assets from Hashling NFT and at least $3 million from the Bitcoin mining project to a holding company — Satoshi Labs LLC (formerly known as Proof of Work Labs LLC), which Mills is the founder and CEO of.

根据5月14日在伊利诺伊州提交的法庭文件，原告声称，他们的前商业伙伴乔纳森·米尔斯（Jonathan Mills）撒谎，撒谎，将资产从Hashling NFT转移到Hashling NFT，并将至少300万美元从比特币矿业项目转移到一家控股公司 - Satoshi Labs LLC（以前称为Work Labs LLC的证明），这是Mills，这是Mills，这是该公司的首席执行官和首席执行官。

The plaintiffs have sued Mills for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, claiming that they have not received any of the equity returns that he supposedly promised for their investments in the project. They also claim to have raised a combined $1.46 million from two NFT drops on the Solana and Bitcoin blockchains.

原告已起诉工厂欺诈和违反信托义务，声称他们尚未收到他据说他承诺要投资该项目的任何股权回报。他们还声称从Solana和Bitcoin区块链上的两个NFT下降了146万美元。

Mills allegedly began ghosting them shortly afterward, according to the plaintiffs, who add that he created a flawed shareholder agreement to falsely support his claim that the holding company controlled the project’s assets. This was “rife with errors” to support his lie, the plaintiffs said.

据原告称，据称米尔斯不久之后就开始欺骗他们，他们补充说，他建立了一项有缺陷的股东协议，以错误地支持他关于控股公司控制该项目资产的说法。原告说，这是“泛滥成灾”来支持他的谎言。

According to the supposedly flawed shareholder agreement, Mills was to receive a 67% equity share in Proof of Work Labs (before he later renamed it to Satoshi Labs) while several other investors contributed up to $20,000 into the company in exchange for just 2% equity. He allegedly assured them that their equity stakes would remain unchanged despite the name change.

根据据称有缺陷的股东协议，米尔斯将在工作证明实验室获得67％的股权份额（随后他将其重命名为Satoshi Labs），而其他几位投资者向公司捐款了高达20,000美元，以换取仅2％的股权。据称，他向他们保证，尽管名称更改，但他们的股权仍保持不变。

Mills also held a 67% voting share on all matters related to Proof of Work Labs (at the time) while no other partner held more than 2%.

米尔斯还对与工作证明实验室相关的所有事项（当时）持有67％的投票股，而没有其他合作伙伴则持有超过2％的股份。

Cointelegraph reached out to Mills but didn’t receive an immediate response.

Cointelegraph与米尔斯联系，但没有立即得到回应。

Mills supposedly didn’t know much about NFTs

据说米尔斯对NFT不太了解

The Hashling NFT project was born from a different idea that Mills had initially discussed with one of the plaintiffs, Dustin Steerman, who initially established rapport with Mills from earlier collaborations. They followed through with the Hashling NFT project despite Mills initially telling Steerman that he had no money and no NFT-related experience to contribute to the project.

Hashling NFT项目源于米尔斯最初与原告之一达斯汀·斯特曼（Dustin Steerman）讨论的不同想法，他最初与早期合作的米尔斯建立了融洽的关系。尽管米尔斯最初告诉Steerman他没有钱，也没有与NFT相关的经验可以为该项目做出贡献，但他们跟随Hashling NFT项目。

“[Mills] had a willingness to help push the project forward, and he did have an idea at the start,” the investor’s attorney, Clinton Ind of Ind Legal Group LLC told Law360.

投资者的律师Ind Legal Group LLC的克林顿IND告诉Law360：“ [米尔斯]愿意帮助推动该项目的前进，他确实有了一个想法。”

To ensure the Hashling NFT project’s success, Mills and Steerman recruited other investors, now also plaintiffs, to assist with everything from the NFT art and social media marketing to even attending NFT conferences in New York. Mills even got his girlfriend to invest in the Hashling NFTs project, the plaintiffs claimed.

为了确保Hashling NFT项目的成功，Mills和Steerman招募了其他现在原告的投资者，以协助NFT艺术和社交媒体营销到参加纽约NFT会议的所有事物。原告声称，米尔斯甚至让他的女友投资于Hashling NFTS项目。

In addition to the fraud and breach of fiduciary actions, the plaintiffs also requested a constructive trust over the project’s assets and full legal restitution.

除了欺诈和违反信托行动外，原告还要求对项目的资产和完全赔偿的建设性信任。