EGLD供應衝擊：MultiverSX是否違反了諾言？

MultiverSX提議刪除EGLD供應上限後，社區面對社區的反對，這一舉動與多年的承諾相矛盾，並引起了人們對通貨膨脹的擔憂。

Hold on to your hats, crypto enthusiasts! The MultiversX community is buzzing after a proposal that could rewrite the rules of EGLD. Let's dive into the drama surrounding the potential removal of the EGLD supply cap.

抓住您的帽子，加密愛好者！ MultiverSX社區正在嗡嗡作響，該提案可以重寫EGLD規則。讓我們深入研究圍繞EGLD供應上限的戲劇。

The Proposal: Inflation Nation?

提案：通貨膨脹國家？

Robert Sasu, a core developer at MultiversX Foundation, dropped a bombshell at “The Foundry” event on October 3, 2025: a governance proposal suggesting the removal of EGLD's supply cap. This is a U-turn of epic proportions, considering MultiversX (formerly Elrond) has long touted a Bitcoin-esque scarcity model with a hard cap of 31.4 million EGLD. Their own website still boasts about this limited supply!

MultiverSX Foundation的核心開發商Robert Sasu於2025年10月3日在“ Foundry”活動中放棄了重磅炸彈：一項治理建議，建議取消EGLD的供應上限。考慮到MultiverSX（以前是Elrond）長期以來一直吹捧比特幣式稀缺模型，硬上限為3140萬EGLD，這是史詩般比例的掉頭。他們自己的網站仍然對此有限的供應有所掌控！

Broken Promises and Backlash

破碎的承諾和反彈

For years, MultiversX has emphasized the scarcity of EGLD, setting it apart from fiat currencies. This proposal feels like a betrayal to many who bought into that vision. Remember when Sasu himself said, “Nobody is talking about increase in supply?” Well, times change, don't they?

多年來，MultiverSX一直強調了EGLD的稀缺性，將其與法定貨幣區分開來。對於許多購買這種願景的人來說，這一建議感覺就像是背叛。還記得Sasu本人說：“沒有人在談論供應增加嗎？”好吧，時代改變了，不是嗎？

The Tokenomics Tango: Inflation vs. Burning

Tokenomics Tango：通貨膨脹與燃燒

The proposed economic framework includes a 9.47% annual tail inflation rate, coupled with a 10% burn of validator fees. Justin Bons, founder of CyberCapital, isn't buying it. He argues that the inflation rate is too high and the burn rate too low, creating an unsustainable model. While some dismissed his concerns, the underlying issues remain.

擬議的經濟框架包括每年9.47％的尾巴通貨膨脹率，再加上10％的驗證者費用。 Cyber​​​​Capital的創始人Justin Bons沒有購買。他認為，通貨膨脹率太高，燃燒率太低，產生了不可持續的模型。雖然有些人駁回了他的擔憂，但仍存在基本問題。

Why the Change of Heart?

為什麼要改變心？

MultiversX argues that these changes are necessary to attract liquidity, align long-term stakeholders, and fuel their expansion into the US market. The idea is that increased adoption will drive revenue, with a significant portion of fees going to developers to incentivize innovation. It's a gamble, but they believe it could position the network for long-term growth.

MultiverSX認為，這些變化對於吸引流動性，保持長期利益相關者並推動其擴展到美國市場是必要的。這個想法是，增加的採用率將帶來收入，而開發商的大量費用將帶給開發商激勵創新。這是一場賭博，但他們認為它可以將網絡定位為長期增長。

The Downside: Dilution and Discontent

缺點：稀釋和不滿

The big risk? Inflation could dilute the holdings of long-term EGLD holders. Validators and smart contract owners might benefit, but at the expense of those who believed in the original scarcity promise. It's a delicate balancing act, and many aren't convinced it'll work.

最大的風險？通貨膨脹可以稀釋長期EGLD持有人的持股。驗證者和智能合同所有者可能會受益，但要犧牲那些相信原始稀缺承諾的人。這是一種微妙的平衡行為，許多人不相信它會起作用。

Market Reaction: EGLD's Rollercoaster Ride

市場反應：EGLD的過山車騎行

As of October 3, 2025, EGLD is trading at $14.25, down 41.31% year-over-year. It's been consistently losing ground in the crypto rankings. Whether this proposal will revitalize the token or further erode confidence remains to be seen.

截至2025年10月3日，EGLD的交易價格為14.25美元，同比下跌41.31％。在加密貨幣排名中，它一直在失去立場。該提議是否會振興令牌或進一步侵蝕信心還有待觀察。

The Takeaway: A Fork in the Road

外賣：路上的叉子

MultiversX is at a crossroads. They're betting that these controversial changes will lead to long-term success, but they risk alienating their loyal community in the process. Only time will tell if this gamble pays off.

Multiversx處於十字路口。他們押注這些有爭議的變化將帶來長期成功，但他們有可能在此過程中疏遠忠實社區。只有時間才能證明這場賭博是否有錢。

So, what's the verdict? Is MultiversX innovating or just backpedaling? One thing's for sure: the conversation is far from over, and the future of EGLD is anything but certain. Buckle up, folks; it's gonna be a wild ride!

那麼，判決是什麼？ Multiversx是創新的還是只是背負的？可以肯定的是：對話還遠遠沒有結束，而EGLD的未來根本不確定。搭扣，伙計們；這將是一個瘋狂的旅程！