EGLD供应冲击：MultiverSX是否违反了诺言？

MultiverSX提议删除EGLD供应上限后，社区面对社区的反对，这一举动与多年的承诺相矛盾，并引起了人们对通货膨胀的担忧。

Hold on to your hats, crypto enthusiasts! The MultiversX community is buzzing after a proposal that could rewrite the rules of EGLD. Let's dive into the drama surrounding the potential removal of the EGLD supply cap.

抓住您的帽子，加密爱好者！ MultiverSX社区正在嗡嗡作响，该提案可以重写EGLD规则。让我们深入研究围绕EGLD供应上限的戏剧。

The Proposal: Inflation Nation?

提案：通货膨胀国家？

Robert Sasu, a core developer at MultiversX Foundation, dropped a bombshell at “The Foundry” event on October 3, 2025: a governance proposal suggesting the removal of EGLD's supply cap. This is a U-turn of epic proportions, considering MultiversX (formerly Elrond) has long touted a Bitcoin-esque scarcity model with a hard cap of 31.4 million EGLD. Their own website still boasts about this limited supply!

MultiverSX Foundation的核心开发商Robert Sasu于2025年10月3日在“ Foundry”活动中放弃了重磅炸弹：一项治理建议，建议取消EGLD的供应上限。考虑到MultiverSX（以前是Elrond）长期以来一直吹捧比特币式稀缺模型，硬上限为3140万EGLD，这是史诗般比例的掉头。他们自己的网站仍然对此有限的供应有所掌控！

Broken Promises and Backlash

破碎的承诺和反弹

For years, MultiversX has emphasized the scarcity of EGLD, setting it apart from fiat currencies. This proposal feels like a betrayal to many who bought into that vision. Remember when Sasu himself said, “Nobody is talking about increase in supply?” Well, times change, don't they?

多年来，MultiverSX一直强调了EGLD的稀缺性，将其与法定货币区分开来。对于许多购买这种愿景的人来说，这一建议感觉就像是背叛。还记得Sasu本人说：“没有人在谈论供应增加吗？”好吧，时代改变了，不是吗？

The Tokenomics Tango: Inflation vs. Burning

Tokenomics Tango：通货膨胀与燃烧

The proposed economic framework includes a 9.47% annual tail inflation rate, coupled with a 10% burn of validator fees. Justin Bons, founder of CyberCapital, isn't buying it. He argues that the inflation rate is too high and the burn rate too low, creating an unsustainable model. While some dismissed his concerns, the underlying issues remain.

拟议的经济框架包括每年9.47％的尾巴通货膨胀率，再加上10％的验证者费用。 Cyber​​Capital的创始人Justin Bons没有购买。他认为，通货膨胀率太高，燃烧率太低，产生了不可持续的模型。虽然有些人驳回了他的担忧，但仍存在基本问题。

Why the Change of Heart?

为什么要改变心？

MultiversX argues that these changes are necessary to attract liquidity, align long-term stakeholders, and fuel their expansion into the US market. The idea is that increased adoption will drive revenue, with a significant portion of fees going to developers to incentivize innovation. It's a gamble, but they believe it could position the network for long-term growth.

MultiverSX认为，这些变化对于吸引流动性，保持长期利益相关者并推动其扩展到美国市场是必要的。这个想法是，增加的采用率将带来收入，而开发商的大量费用将带给开发商激励创新。这是一场赌博，但他们认为它可以将网络定位为长期增长。

The Downside: Dilution and Discontent

缺点：稀释和不满

The big risk? Inflation could dilute the holdings of long-term EGLD holders. Validators and smart contract owners might benefit, but at the expense of those who believed in the original scarcity promise. It's a delicate balancing act, and many aren't convinced it'll work.

最大的风险？通货膨胀可以稀释长期EGLD持有人的持股。验证者和智能合同所有者可能会受益，但要牺牲那些相信原始稀缺承诺的人。这是一种微妙的平衡行为，许多人不相信它会起作用。

Market Reaction: EGLD's Rollercoaster Ride

市场反应：EGLD的过山车骑行

As of October 3, 2025, EGLD is trading at $14.25, down 41.31% year-over-year. It's been consistently losing ground in the crypto rankings. Whether this proposal will revitalize the token or further erode confidence remains to be seen.

截至2025年10月3日，EGLD的交易价格为14.25美元，同比下跌41.31％。在加密货币排名中，它一直在失去立场。该提议是否会振兴令牌或进一步侵蚀信心还有待观察。

The Takeaway: A Fork in the Road

外卖：路上的叉子

MultiversX is at a crossroads. They're betting that these controversial changes will lead to long-term success, but they risk alienating their loyal community in the process. Only time will tell if this gamble pays off.

Multiversx处于十字路口。他们押注这些有争议的变化将带来长期成功，但他们有可能在此过程中疏远忠实社区。只有时间才能证明这场赌博是否有钱。

So, what's the verdict? Is MultiversX innovating or just backpedaling? One thing's for sure: the conversation is far from over, and the future of EGLD is anything but certain. Buckle up, folks; it's gonna be a wild ride!

那么，判决是什么？ Multiversx是创新的还是只是背负的？可以肯定的是：对话还远远没有结束，而EGLD的未来根本不确定。搭扣，伙计们；这将是一个疯狂的旅程！